Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 10th Sep '25
Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 11th Sept 2025
MAIRA AGAYI 10.9
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Sep 11, 2025 EDT
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025- Ind vs UAE 2nd Match, Group A, Dubai 🏏
KIARA EXPOSED 11.9
Mannat Har Khushi Paane Ki: Episode Discussion Thread - 27
"I don't like women who are too thin" : Bipasha Basu
Navri and her eternal victimisation
Anupamaa 10 -11 Sept 2025 Written Update & Daily Discussions Thread
🏠Caption Writing Contest -Bring Pictures to Life!🏠
🏏T20 Asia Cup 2025- BD vs HK 3rd Match, Group B, Abu Dhabi 🏏
🏏Cricket Forum Banner Contest Announcement🏏📢
When Love Finally Grew Up ~ A Rumya Three-Shot [Completed]
MAJOR REVAMP TIME FOR STAR PLUS
Patrama Prem ~ A Gosham SS
Originally posted by: devashree_h
I am not talking about the show or screen-space.I am talking about deeds here.
Originally posted by: sweetmaha
ohhhhhhhhhhhhh yes u r right,but in daily soap dramas they doooo every thing but in real life it not happen.soooooooooo for these things v call it drama π
Originally posted by: devashree_h
No sweetheart, even in dailies they stick to good things.Drama is supposed to be shown where truth shal win.If they show it the other way round, the society wont accept it.Common people will not accept it.Good always wins in the end, be it real life or drama.π
this marriage wud b termed illegal if d previous one had been registered legally.
since dere is no proof of radhe- amoli marriage, how cud dv-amoli marriage b illegal??
infact i think dat dis show is set up on rural background, so i doubt if d dv- urmila marriage is also registered or not?
Originally posted by: devashree_h
Well, the marriage is considered legal if its done in front of society.And the Pandit, the mantras everything was authentic during both marriages.I am sure Thakur did not marry Urmi in some jungle and just exchanged garlands.Just because it was not registered(which we are assuming) doesnt mean it has not happened or that its not legal.So religious sanctity consider no value in todays date?
it 's happened but if u r talking bout d legality of d marriage in a registered sense den it 's not π...& bout d wedding being witnessed by d society π€...den my dear as DV said it "d ppl who were witnessing d retard-amoli wedding were all FAKE π² !! " ....so d wedding 's not registered nor it 's witnessed by d real society wid real ppl π so my frnd d marriage's really not valid in a legal sense ...wen d legality of d marriage in itself is a BIG β den i don't think dat "divorce" can even come in2 d picture π..@least REAL ppl/society's witnessing DV-amoli's wedding π³...& bout DV-urmi's wedding being registered or not den it really doesn't matter in dis case π...coz urmi 's given her full consent 4 dis marriage πππ
it 's but dear wen u talk bout a marriage being legal in d eyes of law den it 's 2 b registered/witnessed by d real society ππ