Today SBB-Rani Sa is the culprit - Page 3

Originally posted by: flamingoAK

Okay I watched the segment. If it is indeed Ranisa, then ITV makers are really phuski bomb and we have been giving them way too much credit so far. 🤣 This was the most obvious thing they could have done and they did...

Reasons why I think it is Ranisa:

1. Rani says the same dialogue about Rajawat foundation. I was unclear why Ranisa said that multiple times. But it's because she considers herself the foundation. She is a queen, so if she goes to jail, the baseline hierarchy will break. Hence this continued emphasis on Rajawat's "neeve" by Ranisa and today mentioned by Rani.
2. Based on holi color symbolism, Rani will unknowingly save Ranisa while trying to save Veer.
   

Reasons why I don't think it is Ranisa:

1. Why would they reveal the mystery in a segment?? WHY. So if they revealed this as a audience magnet, then likely that Ranisa is lying to Veer. Veer doesn't know the truth himself.
2. Why was Nandini's DL thing shown?

I agree. I too had the same questions. Why would they showed about Nandini.

I think the writers are confused . they haven't handled the mystery well. If they had shown the culprit as Nandini it is more trustable.

Originally posted by: caller123

I hope they logically prove the fact. If it's a hit and run how can her earring found in that place?

If there was a break failure surely she couldn't have stopped the car. Then how can her earing drop there?

I can remember she was there with a small bandith.

Why the vendor did not go to police or sell it?

It's a long time.

They are showing comedy again Kate and Rish 🤣 We gave them way too much credit 🤣

They took "hit and run" quite literally. "Hit" with car and then "run" on your feet 🤣🤣

Originally posted by: flamingoAK

Logic is 0. This whole earring segment is horrible. 🤣 What are they going to produce as evidence in court? Some random earring that was found by some vendor who didn't turn it in in time? They are showing anything at this point. 🤣

I agree. How can they prove Veer is innocent with an earring? Rani should have more proof. Will court take it as a proof? Anybody can drop it there after the accident and the opposition can raise more questions.

Originally posted by: flamingoAK

They are showing comedy again Kate and Rish 🤣 We gave them way too much credit 🤣

They took "hit and run" quite literally. "Hit" with car and then "run" on your feet 🤣🤣

I agree.🤣🤣 this will end up like a puski bomb🤣🤣

Originally posted by: caller123

I agree. How can they prove Veer is innocent with an earring? Rani should have more proof. Will court take it as a proof? Anybody can drop it there after the accident and the opposition can raise more questions.

I mean in the real world it wouldn't work. But in ITV world, it might 🤣 I am just laughing now. We came up with such great theories. And if Ranisa is the culprit, turns out to be the biggest phuski bomb 🤣

They better read a lot of mystery stories as homework .🤣🤣 We have read many and we tried to crack it using them and ended up seeing a puski bomb.🤣

Originally posted by: flamingoAK

I mean in the real world it wouldn't work. But in ITV world, it might 🤣 I am just laughing now. We came up with such great theories. And if Ranisa is the culprit, turns out to be the biggest phuski bomb 🤣

yup in ITV world anything can happen. Rani went through two major accidents had two major blood loss and severe injuries. Her bandages were removed just after one day without a mark even. she is a super woman.

Now this🤣

Originally posted by: Rish27

Just checked episode 2. No one was wearing those earrings that day. Not even kiara or her mommy. I would say Someone has set a false trail if this wasn't produced by zero logic productions. 🤣🤣🤣

You have been giving them ideas. Zero production might use them, but give you zero credit 😅

Originally posted by: flamingoAK

Okay I watched the segment. If it is indeed Ranisa, then ITV makers are really phuski bomb and we have been giving them way too much credit so far. 🤣 This was the most obvious thing they could have done and they did...

Reasons why I think it is Ranisa:

1. Rani says the same dialogue about Rajawat foundation. I was unclear why Ranisa said that multiple times. But it's because she considers herself the foundation. She is a queen, so if she goes to jail, the baseline hierarchy will break. Hence this continued emphasis on Rajawat's "neeve" by Ranisa and today mentioned by Rani.
2. Based on holi color symbolism, Rani will unknowingly save Ranisa while trying to save Veer.
   

Reasons why I don't think it is Ranisa:

1. Why would they reveal the mystery in a segment?? WHY. So if they revealed this as a audience magnet, then likely that Ranisa is lying to Veer. Veer doesn't know the truth himself.
2. Why was Nandini's DL thing shown?

Yeah, I also think it might be Ranisa and there is no bigger mystery. Ranisa thinks very highly of herself.

In the episode when Veer yelled at Rani in front of the entire family, Rani said "what if your Ranisa were there instead of my Bauji?"

The camera was focused on Ranisa, she was shocked/scared and clenched her hand. That scene + DV talking about her mistake made me doubt her. However, they might be forshadwoing another mystery, because I don't think DV know anything about the accident.

Nandini's DL might be a distraction for the audience. Just like Ranisa-Vikram scene.

Originally posted by: Yaso1.0

Yeah, I also think it might be Ranisa and there is no bigger mystery. Ranisa thinks very highly of herself.

In the episode when Veer yelled at Rani in front of the entire family, Rani said "what if your Ranisa were there instead of my Bauji?"

The camera was focused on Ranisa, she was shocked/scared and clenched her hand. That scene + DV talking about her mistake made me doubt her. However, they might be forshadwoing another mystery, because I don't think DV know anything about the accident.

Nandini's DL might be a distraction for the audience. Just like Ranisa-Vikram scene.

This makes sense. I guess you are right. Nandini might have brought just to distract us. I always cut Rani Sa's scenes so I didn't see what you said plus didn't watch that episode.