Originally posted by: Paru...
Maya ka khoon is just not a usage. Some traits of a person is inherited through genes.That is why i used the term Maya's blood.CA shows the same psychotic behaviour like Maya when she gets panic attacks.
T shows traits of V .A person can get traits of any of the parent as they have genes of both parents and the more dominant gene's trait will be exhibited. Like everyone says Samar was very much like Anu.
Just because u don't like it doesn't make it a regressive language. These are facts. and science.
What you are referring to is Mendelian Inheritance which was study conducted by Gregor Mendel on pea plants and focused on inheritance of traits from parent to child.
But in this context i.e. behaviour, we need to consider Behavioural Genetics which focuses on the relationship of genetic variation and psychological traits. Because well you know...Toshu, Pakhi, Samar and Aadhya's genetic makeup is slightly more complex than a pea plant.
Also the background of behavioural genetics comes from selective breeding that was done to get better horses, cattle etc in ancient times. And this change was not observed in a small sample size. The breeders bred for several generations before they saw a change in the traits of the animals changing from 'wild' to more 'domesticated' versions.
So then Toshu, Pakhi and Samar are too small a sample size. So we must look to the next generation as well. That would be Ansh and Pari, as Ishani is adopted. So we set her aside.
Now Pari seems to be a relatively settled child even though she is inheriting gene from Toshu who as you say inherited the dominant gene of Vanraj. So then by your logic, Pari should have been a wild spoiled child. Hmmm...but she isn't..
Okay, we'll call that observation 1.
Now let's focus on Ansh who is the biological child of Samar, who as you say got dominant traits from Anupama. Okay...so following that Ansh should have inherited an interest in dance and been a relatively calm, settled child. Ah...but the science seems to be going off course again...he's quite uh...let's say naughty...no?
Okay well that's observation 2.
Of course we must also consider the fact that Behavioural Genetics has been mostly studied on twins. Monozygotic twins and Dizygotic twins. I am sure you are very aware of what they are since this is science and fact.
The monozygotic twins exhibited similar behaviour despite being raised apart because as you must be aware monozygotic twins share 100% genome and dizygotic twins share 50% of their genome. Which means genetically monozygotic twins are identical but even they were found to not be completely in sync when it came to psychiatric disorder or behavioural traits because even Behavioural Genetics admits that environment plays a role in human behaviour.
Science! Science believes environment plays a role in human behaviour and accepts that environmental influence can infact make members of the same family vary in behaviour.
Well now Observation 1 and Observation 2 are starting to make sense. How Ansh is more erratic in behaviour despite inheriting the traits from Samar who had the dominant traits of Anupama and why Pari is more calm and well natured despite inheriting traits from Toshu who had the dominant traits of Vanraj.
Hmmm...so I guess even science can't save your nonsensical argument that Aadhya's behaviour is something solely inherited from Maya. It is not. It is the combined effort of genetics and environment in which Anupama sad to say did play a part. So we cannot negate Anupama's influence from the way Aadhya has turned out and the same is true for the other children as well, excluding the grandchildren where Anupama has remained a fleeting presence. And that my dear is the cold hard bitter truth
6