Originally posted by: Bodhianveshika
I know transformations in television shows are instant but yeah, I would like to believe he is a good guy caught in circumstances.
Do you think it somewhere does not add up?
Not to forget, Adhik was a child when he was forsaken by his elder brother. He agreed Barkha's eye for business. He too harboured a sense of hurt and empathy towards his sister.
His extravagant lifestyle could be attributed to escape from the situations at home? He probably did not know any other way? May be🤷🏻♀️?
Barkha has, on many occasions said that she was not supported in the family and it was love lost in the marriage. She was not allowed to contribute in the business which both knew Ankush was not good at. Her actions, dialogues reflected neglect, thankless marriage and a sense of being treated as as outsider.
As one of the fellow readers mentioned, the character arc of Ankush and Barkha is shallow and highly questionable.
From Saat Phere to Anupama, feel bad for the actor ending up with the good but overshadowed Bhabhi.
Regarding barkha not getting support from hubby or his family before 2 decades back in 80s and 90s thats how husband and his family were90% of time with their wife unlike now
You ask anyone whose married in 80s or 90s they will say same as barkha and anupama mostly
The culture was such that unlike now wife had no say in money matters even f they were degree holders
Even if family lived in big city of india they lived mostly joint family with grandparents and few hubby brothers etc in womans house in 70s 80s 90s etc so you had in laws and hubby deciding most things economically for the wife unlike now
It was more of husband or father in law handlng finances and dictating things to women of house be it daughters wife or bahu or grand daughters
Even if woman went to work the hubby only decided what to do with her majority money n 80s and 90s
Its only after 2000s when ppl started migrating to big city in droves and left parents grandparents behind in villages that woman have got some freedom to decide or regarding money etc
If the hubby family s in big city only like vanraj parents sister etc live with him its tough to get freedom even today
That is why woman nowdayas marry and leave to other city or abroad to avoid hubby family
Not to say only wives are victims in parichail society like india
But mother in laws sister in laws daughters all face this issue of freedom at home if family stays in city with them
Its not barkha or anupama exclusive story
If dolly was not married hasmukh and baa and vanraj would expect her 80% salary to be given in their hands and they would decide what to do with it
If pakhi had gone to work before marriage she would be expected to give majority money in baa or vvanraj hands only they would decide how to use
Only in this serial they show only anupama is tortured no finnace freedom but most woman face same issue before or after marraige you see at hands of father or hubby etc
See anupama is married but she still pays shah house emis as shes daughter
Right now kavya and kinjal are only working members of shahs
How much respect they get hardly any by their hubby, in laws or kids too(step kids in kavya case)
If adhik and pakhi had gone to shah house shahs would have treated adhik just like anuj or more worst as he has no so much wealth too
who was and is providing to shahs actually? Rakhi anuj kavya kinjal anupama all outsiders not real son or daughter of house
Edited by myviewprem - 2 years ago