How different is audience from Poddars?

Poddars continuously belittled Armaan because he was sautela because he was supposedly born out of wedlock

I see audience's response to the hope of Shivani being Madhav's first wife is that now, Vidya isn't his wife which makes Rohit illegitimate also makes his son Daksh illegitimate

The audience has the same thought process as Poddar people

Similar instance of Abhira - Ruhi pregnancy, where audience wanted Ruhi to go through miscarriage so Poddars will hate her for not being able to have kids

The audience doesn't think that you shouldn't hate kids who are "sautela" or women shouldn't be hated for not being able to bear children, they want the process to continue, misogyny and regressive thought process should exist but it should be for those whom we hate, this is educated audience of twitter and other platforms

Shahi audience is like that.

For anupama too people wanted the adopted kid fo be grateful to anu despite so much emotional drama

These two shows audience be like their leads should be happy with whatever they want rest people can rot. Fanfic does that not a serial which is money making machine

Ruhi to Bhai Hitler hogyi lmao completely whitewashing Arman who was also agreed to marry ruhi and left her in mandap cause he was bhakt of fl for a while..now too same guy does charcter assassination of fl chalega cause angst and he's so pretty and etc etc 😂 in short don't take people seriously lol

Definitely not defending or was aware of new thinking of people calling Rohit/Daksh illegitimate or supporting useless things but it's nothing new.

Abhinav was always mocked in this forum for being "Orphan" or "Driver". Now the same people who mocked him for this very reason will come and support your post.

The thing is many of them support their favorite actors/characters so much that they stop differentiating between what is actually right and wrong maybe it's because of the age group or so . It could be different life experiences too. That maturity comes with time or might not too if you have only experienced the bright side.

Originally posted by: Phir_Mohabbat

Shahi audience is like that.

For anupama too people wanted the adopted kid fo be grateful to anu despite so much emotional drama

These two shows audience be like their leads should be happy with whatever they want rest people can rot. Fanfic does that not a serial which is money making machine

Ruhi to Bhai Hitler hogyi lmao completely whitewashing Arman who was also agreed to marry ruhi and left her in mandap cause he was bhakt of fl for a while..now too same guy does charcter assassination of fl chalega cause angst and he's so pretty and etc etc 😂 in short don't take people seriously lol

Armaan can do anything, he literally has done the worst thing of framing Abhira in fake corruption charges and got her license cancelled, taking away her source of income then making her feel bad for demanding alimony because he would prefer to see her begging for food again

But it isn't about character or makers, it is about the audience, audience is not against the thought process of Poddar, they support it but they just want those whom they hate to be at the receiving end of it

Originally posted by: PeacefulLove

Definitely not defending or was aware of new thinking of people calling Rohit/Daksh illegitimate or supporting useless things but it's nothing new.

Abhinav was always mocked in this forum for being "Orphan" or "Driver". Now the same people who mocked him for this very reason will come and support your post.

The thing is many of them support their favorite actors/characters so much that they stop differentiating between what is actually right and wrong maybe it's because of the age group or so . It could be different life experiences too. That maturity comes with time or might not too if you have only experienced the bright side.

Whataboutery is a form of defence, Abhinav's character didn't have a dedicated track for him so I can't relate him to the current discussion because Goenkas, Birlas and Sharmas, everyone accepted him for who he was, was there a track where Goenkas rejected him for being an orphan or a driver?

Audience makes up many narratives like many say Abhimanyu killed him but that wasn't in the episode, people make up things in their head

This is about a message being served, FL is saying on the show that Armaan isn't a sautela and how his family belittles him, the audience doesn't follow the message, they support the thought process, they just want Armaan to be legitimate child, they won't say that Armaan is who he is, even if he is illegitimate

Same for Abhira's miscarriage thing, when the track was about Vidya favouring Ruhi because she could be a mother, people didn't want a message where Vidya feels that she was wrong and she should support Abhira no matter what, they wanted Ruhi to have miscarriage and Abhira to give waris

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

Armaan can do anything, he literally has done the worst thing of framing Abhira in fake corruption charges and got her license cancelled, taking away her source of income then making her feel bad for demanding alimony because he would prefer to see her begging for food again

But it isn't about character or makers, it is about the audience, audience is not against the thought process of Poddar, they support it but they just want those whom they hate to be at the receiving end of it

Our desi audience can settle abroad work in fcking nasa lmao but dekhna hai yehi ghatiya shows 😂😂😂😂

Are so what Arman did corruption charge. He's crying writing he's wrong 😂 he's hallucinating his ex wife accepting another man. Isn't that redemption and proof of his epic love 😂😂😂 of course rk is wrong. How dare he fall in love with another girl 😂

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

Whataboutery is a form of defence, Abhinav's character didn't have a dedicated track for him so I can't relate him to the current discussion because Goenkas, Birlas and Sharmas, everyone accepted him for who he was, was there a track where Goenkas rejected him for being an orphan or a driver?

Audience makes up many narratives like many say Abhimanyu killed him but that wasn't in the episode, people make up things in their head

This is about a message being served, FL is saying on the show that Armaan isn't a sautela and how his family belittles him, the audience doesn't follow the message, they support the thought process, they just want Armaan to be legitimate child, they won't say that Armaan is who he is, even if he is illegitimate

Same for Abhira's miscarriage thing, when the track was about Vidya favouring Ruhi because she could be a mother, people didn't want a message where Vidya feels that she was wrong and she should support Abhira no matter what, they wanted Ruhi to have miscarriage and Abhira to give waris

The audience has always been misogynist and regressive. In India particularly people become less misogynist only if the woman is the perfect submissive doormat like Anupama and Abhira. Then they may feel bad for them and want some good for them but that’s only until they stay in their place which is under the husband’s feet or in-laws feet. But if a woman is out spoken, realistic or have any slight shade of grey like Ruhi and others then they deserve the worst even though the same audience will love, justify and forgive anything for men who are much worse like Armaan, RK, Arnav, etc.

Originally posted by: MsWhiskerson

Whataboutery is a form of defence, Abhinav's character didn't have a dedicated track for him so I can't relate him to the current discussion because Goenkas, Birlas and Sharmas, everyone accepted him for who he was, was there a track where Goenkas rejected him for being an orphan or a driver?

Audience makes up many narratives like many say Abhimanyu killed him but that wasn't in the episode, people make up things in their head

This is about a message being served, FL is saying on the show that Armaan isn't a sautela and how his family belittles him, the audience doesn't follow the message, they support the thought process, they just want Armaan to be legitimate child, they won't say that Armaan is who he is, even if he is illegitimate

Same for Abhira's miscarriage thing, when the track was about Vidya favouring Ruhi because she could be a mother, people didn't want a message where Vidya feels that she was wrong and she should support Abhira no matter what, they wanted Ruhi to have miscarriage and Abhira to give waris

You can hate me but I also think Abhimanyu was responsible for Abhinavs death. Makers could have written his death 1000 other ways but they wanted some audience to hate him so ofcourse Abhinavs death Abhimanyu was involved. He took him out on his birthday, kept giving him drinks, threw his on side making him believe he is drinking too and he lost his balance. Ofcourse he didn't push him but they can't show that as the whole purpose of making Abhinav die was to unite leads again not make him villain. And soon after his death he proposed his ex wife again. So all this looked like a cunning plot and no matter how much we discuss but Abhimanyu and Abhinav fans will not change their opinions.

Your post was on audience thinking and it am also not telling goenkas calling him orphan or driver. The same audience who are now feeling bad for audience calling Rohit/Daksh illegitimate.

No matter how much you deny but the fact is only 20% of the audience are no ones fans and they dont care. Other 80% will keep defending their favorites.