I feel disgusted with Armaan - Page 5

Originally posted by: xanalyst

as in their eyes ruhi is a vamp, I want her to beat the shit out of both the a***les. I am having pretty high hopes from you ruru I hope you won't disappoint me

1. divorce your bhabhi lover husband rohit
2. give him and his pathetic brother some slaps, punches and kicks

bass itni si wish hai meri

Must make police complaint and send thre Rohit , Arman and that Dr in to jail ,

Originally posted by: Rosh4rose

Last time it was different mother was left alone so she chose another man to be her baccha's father.

This time they went too far ... literally stole "baby" from the Vamp Ruhi ...Told Ruhi her baccha died whare as Abira's baccha died.

They degraded ML , made him a criminal who will commit any crime to feed his wife's infatuation, to keep her smiling 😃

Now they want biological mom to hate her own child ...pukeworthy...It is a crime a way lore serious that Gen 3.

Originally posted by: Indira1211

what Armaan and rohit did is terrible . I hated it when karthik stole kirtis baby as well. But I think here they are going to turn it around here….If it was Ruhis baby ..he would have gone back to Ruhi by now ..and they are showing no,connection between the baby and Ruhi..so,looks like the baby may go to Ruhi but will,then be revealed that he is in fact abhiras baby… so just like the bal gopal that went from abhira to Ruhi and then back to abhira ..it’s going to be the same with the baby.. and they’ll remove the Baccha chor tag from the hero.. in gen 2 the baby went back to the real,parents within a few days..here they’re keeping the baby with abhira for ages. Also Ruhis bloodline only have 1 daughter while the legacy heroines have a son first then a daughter … and dkp follows this in all the generations.. so we’ll see what the true story is behind this baby drama… 🤷🏻‍♀️

How will bacha tag will be removed even if they magically make the baby leads.

Irrespective of whose kid it is, armaan enjoying his time with stolen kid without any hesitation. It proved he don't mind having stolen kid just to please his wife even if it means seperating a kid from the mother.

According to him it is ruhi's kid, yet he is enjoying with the kid as his own by letting a mother grieve for her kid. Ruhi's kid magically turning abhira's kid won't change how he acted as bacha chor when he thought the kid was ruhi's.

Originally posted by: Sparkle232

How will bacha tag will be removed even if they magically make the baby leads.

Irrespective of whose kid it is, armaan enjoying his time with stolen kid without any hesitation. It proved he don't mind having stolen kid just to please his wife even if it means seperating a kid from the mother.

According to him it is ruhi's kid, yet he is enjoying with the kid as his own by letting a mother grieve for her kid. Ruhi's kid magically turning abhira's kid won't change how he acted as bacha chor when he thought the kid was ruhi's.

Even as per legacy first born always dies for fl. Does that mean if ruhi loose her first born we should assume she is the FL

Originally posted by: Sparkle232

How will bacha tag will be removed even if they magically make the baby leads.

Irrespective of whose kid it is, armaan enjoying his time with stolen kid without any hesitation. It proved he don't mind having stolen kid just to please his wife even if it means seperating a kid from the mother.

According to him it is ruhi's kid, yet he is enjoying with the kid as his own by letting a mother grieve for her kid. Ruhi's kid magically turning abhira's kid won't change how he acted as bacha chor when he thought the kid was ruhi's.

Originally posted by: Sparkle232

How will bacha tag will be removed even if they magically make the baby leads.

Irrespective of whose kid it is, armaan enjoying his time with stolen kid without any hesitation. It proved he don't mind having stolen kid just to please his wife even if it means seperating a kid from the mother.

According to him it is ruhi's kid, yet he is enjoying with the kid as his own by letting a mother grieve for her kid. Ruhi's kid magically turning abhira's kid won't change how he acted as bacha chor when he thought the kid was ruhi's.

And no way they can pass off a 9 month old baby as a premature baby ...if abhiras baby us alive , it's not this baby

Ofc it doesn't change the fact how shameless and cruel arman & rohit acted 🤢 gosh I didn't hate anyone like this since the white day.

Gratitude need not be paid off ..gratitude is not an exchange deal no ..

Originally posted by: firewings_diya

yes and how ppl should assume in future dkp wil show this child as Abhimaan's and support their chori 🤔

Even as per legacy first born always dies for fl. Does that mean if ruhi loose her first born we should assume she is the FL

One of the most ridiculous explanation i read in this thread is that bachha belonging to Abheera.

How is it even possible, didnt thr doctor clearly say that Abheera's baby was stillborn??

Apne mind ko itna delusional kaise nanate hai log.

And how can anyone support bachha chori. Its disgusting.

Originally posted by: Indira1211

well technically he’s not baccha chor as the father of the baby rohit gave him the baby…he didn’t steal it. It’s not like Gen 2 where karthik took Keeshs baby without their knowledge. Rohit cared nothing for his wife and still doesn’t as he happily gave their baby away… so that’s the story in this situation…Ruhi has a husband who doesn’t care two hoots for her while Armaan will do anything for his wife..even accept another woman’s child and pretend it’s his. It doesn’t make rohit or armaans deed any better just like how Ruhi hating on an innocent baby because she lost hers doesn’t make her any better.. rohit , Armaan , Ruhi are all behaving horribly in this situation..only innocent party is abhira.

People who steal a kid from the mother and be an accomoliance in stealing are CHORES. If ruhi files a complaint, law will punish BOTH of them along with the doctor for forging the living baby's death. Mother has first and foremost right on the kid. Anything done without her consent is illegal.