They ruined it again… - Page 3

Originally posted by: Peacelover15

I feel so too.... But we knew Abhimanyu would win so makers just fast forwarded it like anything

🤣 I am just glad!

Originally posted by: Deltablues

That literally is not how it works. A forgery on an educational certificate overstates your qualification and is false information. Your birth certificate in India doesn't necessiate a father's name let alone a biological father's name. No court in the world will give the custodial rights the father on that basis or any basis unless the mother is entirely encapacitated and/or proven to be abusive.

Originally posted by: R.G.C

No bro, she was not married to Abhin na when she gave Abhin’s name as father? Plus doesn’t matter whether she is divorced or not, if dna test happens it will be clear who the biological father is. And it would still be felony. And in most custody cases fathers get full custody because of felony or finances itself. And finance to I am saying because wo khud bolte rehte hai middle class, gareeb time and again, so I believe that is a point writers have been focussing on. But haan Ak’s side can debate and prove that she was abused by Birlas and in that case the judge might consider her side too. And they could even bring the criminal history of the family, like Manjari hiding Neil’s paternity, Anand Birla drunken operation, Mahima and Parth evidence hiding and all that and made her case strong, by saying that she did not feel this kind of environment was fit for her child to grow. Then the debate would be strong. But the point is writers have completely forgot the whole story and are just rushing through old plot lines. Its like they are envisioning the future without looking at the past, same as me becoming a doctor with an engineering degree

Originally posted by: India_TV

it is totally questionable how the full custody goes to abhi....even after the white day events are disclosed....

I believe that this is done, so that abhir knows the truth and hates abhi....warna sharmas to kuch batate nahi ki kyun abhi is not the father...what he had had done...and what akshu had to face....and off course abhi and his mamma to nahi batayenge....

I believe that ,makers wanted abhir in birla house to know the full truth as y his rwp is not in the picture....

baki to makers hi jaane...how will they justify abhi getting abhir's custody.....

Yep the writers had decided that they want abhir to somehow move to live with abhimanyu to push forward the story, so they got lazy and decided why even bother justifying to the audience on what basis the custody was decided.

Originally posted by: Chaitu.V

@bold what ?? R u serious ? And how exactly are u doing that?
Ak is not denying or Abhinav is claiming Abhir as his bio son ,they both openly saying AbM is his bio dad so how n why the DNA test came in btwn all this? NO! most of the custody cases esp with minor kids will be given to mother’s unless they r mentally/physically unfit! And Here the kid is super happy with his mom and dad and ur financial conditions point is baseless as at least 50% population of Indian house hold live in that situation! They r giving best education to the kid and parvarish too ! So it was kept on mute just because they have no logic to justify how Birla’s won the case!

People seriously need to stop pushing this false narrative that somehow finances are a legitimate reason for a parent losing a child custody. That is never the final deciding factor or even the main reason as on that basis most parents would have their children taken from them and deemed unfit to raise a child. It is always whether the parent is physically and mentally capable of raising a child or if the parent can be deemed as an actual threat to the child.

If this was real life and not a lazily-written tv soap opera, the bio father would not be given custody over the mother and would get visitation rights, not full custody, because there is no legitimate reason for a court to take a child from the mother in this scenario that has been created in this show, even if as an audience people are feeling sorry for abhimanyu for being robbed of his parental rights, but that's a fact.

Mother's are seen as the primary caregivers even in an ever progressive society where traditional gender roles are shifting to men and women both carrying out the same roles and responsibilities in a household more, but one thing that hasn't changed is that the mother is naturally far more involved in the upbringing and care of the child and children tend to seek their mother's care more.

Originally posted by: Miss-Behave

People seriously need to stop pushing this false narrative that somehow finances are a legitimate reason for a parent losing a child custody. That is never the final deciding factor or even the main reason as on that basis most parents would have their children taken from them and deemed unfit to raise a child. It is always whether the parent is physically and mentally capable of raising a child or if the parent can be deemed as an actual threat to the child.

If this was real life and not a lazily-written tv soap opera, the bio father would not be given custody over the mother and would get visitation rights, not full custody, because there is no legitimate reason for a court to take a child from the mother in this scenario that has been created in this show, even if as an audience people are feeling sorry for abhimanyu for being robbed of his parental rights, but that's a fact.

Mother's are seen as the primary caregivers even in an ever progressive society where traditional gender roles are shifting to men and women both carrying out the same roles and responsibilities in a household more, but one thing that hasn't changed is that the mother is naturally far more involved in the upbringing and care of the child and children tend to seek their mother's care more.

He can apply for joint custody, appeals are usually entertained.

Finances won't come into the pic at all, entire UD knows about Akshara's wealth.