What is the dikkath in telling truth to abhir? - Page 3

Originally posted by: NomadicWonders

Exactly, all three were about to reveal and then bham it’s custody again.

I don’t understand why Ak and Abhinav have to follow BP. Abhi can’t say anything here coz BP won’t listen to him rather accuse him more saying uska fayda hai. But what about Ak and Abhinav, why did they change their stance again suddenly? Just because it works in their favour again to hide. They are not thinking that Abhir already knows the half truth, that it would keep bothering him.

I don’t agree that BP and Manjiri stopped the truth from coming out. Ak and Abhinav are parents, they could have opposed BP and went ahead with telling Abhir. Subsequently work out arrangements for co-parenting. But there is no intent from Ak and Abhinav to co-parent, hence custody.

There was no intent from abhims side also na. His mummy riled up the pot . It's in his best interest also that he wins custody that's why he also didn't stop mummy no ?

Akshnav also r behaving illogical and ridiculous . They must tell the truth to abhir , he will anyways know. . May be abhir says he won't leave akshnav..may be he says he wants abhim ..either ways it's his right to know

Originally posted by: lagjagale

I think they are referring to before the six years, when Ak got rejected by Abhi, and no one came to look for her. Her comment has been - If you looked for me, you would have found your son/grandson as well. So she felt rejected and didn't want to tell them about Abhir cause then they would have come but only for the baby and not her. I doubt Abhi would have separated a mother and son. More likely, Ak would be forgiven by everybody, and people would have moved on. But Ak wanted them to come for her, which is valid, and I understand that. The part that isn't okay, is that she can move on with someone else, but she can't keep a child away from his real father and then just give away the rights to someone else. That part was her just taking revenge and covering up.

This 🫴

Originally posted by: Krinya

There was no intent from abhims side also na. His mummy riled up the pot . It's in his best interest also that he wins custody that's why he also didn't stop mummy no ?

Akshnav also r behaving illogical and ridiculous . They must tell the truth to abhir , he will anyways know. . May be abhir says he won't leave akshnav..may be he says he wants abhim ..either ways it's his right to know

Wahi toh its confusing me

Originally posted by: Krinya

There was no intent from abhims side also na. His mummy riled up the pot . It's in his best interest also that he wins custody that's why he also didn't stop mummy no ?

Akshnav also r behaving illogical and ridiculous . They must tell the truth to abhir , he will anyways know. . May be abhir says he won't leave akshnav..may be he says he wants abhim ..either ways it's his right to know

Manjiri didn’t put the condition, neither initiated custody, she just agreed to it because BP said only Abhinav is Abhir’s father and no one will tell Abhir about his biological father.

I agree Manjiri is delusional in thinking Abhir should live permanently in BH, but I don’t remember that being intent of AbhiM. He has always said he wants to be part of Abhir’s life, he wants Abhir to know AbhiM is his father. But Ak has always refused to do that. So there is no other option left for AbhiM to get into his son’s life.

Even after custody declaration, AbhiM is still thinking about how co-parenting could work 👇🏼

https://twitter.com/IndulvsHC/status/1673967922350526464?s=20

Because they want to enjoy our bheja fry 😆

manish put the condition

But when lawyer told today to take Abhir to the court, he did not object 🤣

Kya Abhimaniyu burkha pehenke ata court mein 😆

Originally posted by: DiamondLife

Because they want to enjoy our bheja fry 😆

manish put the condition

But when lawyer told today to take Abhir to the court, he did not object 🤣

Kya Abhimaniyu burkha pehenke ata court mein 😆

Idea acha hai🤣

Originally posted by: NomadicWonders

Your last para is absolutely true, Ak and Nav should tell Abhir, specifically now because he already knows half truth. But I disagree about AbhiM’s intent and stopping Manjiri in custody battle.

Manjiri didn’t put the condition, neither initiated custody, she just agreed to it because BP said only Abhinav is Abhir’s father and no one will tell Abhir about his biological father.

Manjari isn't as innocent . She's the one who created a huge drama when nobody was talking of custody anymore. She and manish both . Abhim abhinav and akshara at least created a better atmosphere to sit and talk ..yes they didn't tell abhir when they should have but muskan wedding came ..and all the excuses after rhat which r unjustifiable. ..still abhin was about to tell abhir when he was interrupted.

Both abhim and akshara want abhir that's why this custody case is going on. It's their intent , their majboori and their choice bec they r not able to help it...both can also discuss other solutions but they don't....For me , kyun nai bataya , kis ne nahi bataya , kab batana theek tha , is irrelevant. Only when abhir knows the complete truth will the story move forward..

Originally posted by: Krinya

Idea acha hai🤣

Manish ne dur ki nahi sochi 🤪

Uper se akshara law ki exam dene gayi thi 2 times 🤣

Originally posted by: Krinya

Manjari isn't as innocent . She's the one who created a huge drama when nobody was talking of custody anymore. She and manish both . Abhim abhinav and akshara at least created a better atmosphere to sit and talk ..yes they didn't tell abhir when they should have but muskan wedding came ..and all the excuses after rhat which r unjustifiable. ..still abhin was about to tell abhir when he was interrupted.

Both abhim and akshara want abhir that's why this custody case is going on. It's their intent , their majboori and their choice bec they r not able to help it...both can also discuss other solutions but they don't....For me , kyun nai bataya , kis ne nahi bataya , kab batana theek tha , is irrelevant. Only when abhir knows the complete truth will the story move forward..

I honestly don't see how Manjari is at fault for this. I think she is delusional yes and she shouldn't have said those things to Nav. But how is that at all related to not telling Abhir the truth? Goenkas along with Ak don't want to acknowledge the truth themselves that Abhi is Abhir's father. The whole thing was to make Nav feel better, which he didn't cause it doesn't even make sense like that. It just doesn't make sense. I agree that Manjari stirred the pot, but this outcome is completely BP's fault for making the situation complicated.

His reasoning, from what I understand, is that if Abhi doesn't win the custody then Sharma fam can keep the status quo of not telling Abhir so things will remain the same. He is so sure that Ak will win, so he is not even thinking that if she doesn't, Abhir loses everything he has known.