Blame Game = Viewers Sympathy

If CVs are trying to get viewer's sympathy for Vedika's character by introducing Akshat the bad guy of her life...they will create circumstances where Vedika will be blamed, slapped or thrown out by Goenkas/ Singhanias...Her long breakdown scenes will be shown the way Kartik and Naira cried and had breakdown every single episode post leap....Kartik had emotional breakdown in dark room and Naira had emotional breakdown in Goa...Vedika having that intense, prolonged, detailed and repetitive breakdown scenes...given majority of the SS....Is that even possible?... Goenkas sympathy NEVER equals to viewer's sympathy...Goenkas sympathized with Suwarna when Shubham died...Naira was blamed and thrown out...nobody among Goenkas took firm stand for her (though Manish was on Naira's side)...viewers sympathized with Naira and disliked Suwarna though Goenkas sympathized with Suwarna...Kartik was blamed and ill treated by Naksh during baby swap track...viewers sympathized with Kartik even after criticizing Kartik during baby swap scenario....Naira's tears after choosing her life herself were annoying for several SM viewers (including me)...but when Bhabhi maa slapped her in hospital even after knowing that her child was battling for life....general and SM viewers both sympathized with her....criticized Bhabhi maa and Singhanias (barring fewest)...in order to make viewers sympathize with Vedika...first of all they need to improve their camera shifts...hardly her expressions are captured for the entire time her scenes are shown...and those captured seem artificial...Akshat (don't know actor's name) is so effin' good....I like watching his scenes minus Vedu...Vedika infront of him appears an amateur in terms of convincing viewers(barring fewest) that she is victim ....maybe we are habitual of seeing better performers...who nail all their scenes regardless of how flawed/annoying their characters have been be they Shivin, Sachin Sir, Lata Ma'm, Swati Ma'm or even Shilpa, Ali Sir, Romit (Aditya), Kabir (don't know actor's name)....Khair...loved all Kaira scenes...their banters appear refreshing every single time...their looks for Halloween party were amazing....Kairav will get kidnapped by Akshat...if he is shown someone who tried to kill Vedika's father for his property or mentally tortured Vedika...that's how Vedika agreed to stay in stranger's home to save her life...or agreed for loveless marriage to stay protected...she was refused police protection...her friend also abandoned her...Dr. Pallavi Vedika best friend who moved heaven and earth...called media people...involved police to save Vedika when she was kidnapped...straightaway refuse to help her come out of abusive relationship...maybe than viewers sympathize with Vedika...but for viewers sympathy in case of no other alternative available for Vedika (demanding police protection wasn't possible, Dr. Pallavi's refusal to help her)... even than for making half of yrkkh viewers sympathize with her...her portrayal need to be convincing...merely shedding tears by help of glycerin doesn't help generate viewers sympathy...Akshat adds the needed dramatic effect and progression to the story but his character might have same ending as Kabir....Yrkkh script and screenplay writers can only think of extremes and regressive portrayal of women...a woman too helpless and manipulative to stay dependent on strangers for protection broke a family, got husband and wife divorce even when their kid needed them together to stay dependent and protected by family...or a woman too nosy and rigid to think of circumstances of her action of abandoning her loved ones someone who can't handle her own life but try to fix other people's life....a woman too anti woman to want only boy child the heir of family but why can't girl child be heiress?...desperate for parpota got her grandson married forcefully...a woman too broadminded to forgive her husband who cheated on her....I have given up on wishing to see good content on "a show bigger than anything"...more precisely post baby's death revelation scenes...power packed performances with almost no dialogues...breakdown scenes of ML and FL at different times knowing their first born died....

Viewers can’t stand vedika so she’ll get no sympathy whatever they show because she is the reason why karthik and naira are not reuniting..but these makers have decided to keep her in the show and they are creating situations where the characters in the show namely goenkas and even possibly kaira may sympathize with her..e.g, if akshat has abused and blackmailed her over the years..

They should have asked our opinion through poll. We would have told them that no matter what we won’t sympathise that irritating Vedika whose ultimate mantra is Naira tum Ko Yeh ghar chodna hoga.Ofcourse very few are there with her..I exempt them from poll. Unn ecessarily Vedika scenes are created which are unbearable..I mean both the charecter and actress.

Originally posted by: ltelidevara

They should have asked our opinion through poll. We would have told them that no matter what we won’t sympathise that irritating Vedika whose ultimate mantra is Naira tum Ko Yeh ghar chodna hoga.Ofcourse very few are there with her..I exempt them from poll. Unn ecessarily Vedika scenes are created which are unbearable..I mean both the charecter and actress.

True ya, in what world people can sympathize with a home breaker, child hater, manipulator, desperate lady because she had an abusive past. Abusive or bad past doesn’t make you evil. If one is good , they will always be good , like Kaira or even the Shinghus and the Maheswaris. They all have faced worst scenarios in their lives , unfair situations, death or closed ones , blamed for no faults n what not.

Vedika's is not at all a good human being , she forgot that Naira is Kartik’s love of life , she is the woman Kartik was mourning for those 5 years and most importantly she is mother of his ailing son who he treats as his priority now. Any good human will try to understand the situation instead of jumping on the bed to take over her husband , creating arguments out of nowhere, talking rudely to the ex wife, thinking about the ex-wife getting killed somehow ... the list about Vedika’s evilness goes on. If at all she wasn’t wrong in the abusive past then why is she getting blackmailed, why is she giving money to the same person who abused her and now she has let him enter the house which gave her protection and shelter. Dint question her when she was blatantly lying about her whereabouts for weeks, she is getting that amount of trust from non trusting non thankful people like Goenkas and this is how she is paying them back 🤣

Originally posted by: Sur89

True ya, in what world people can sympathize with a home breaker, child hater, manipulator, desperate lady because she had an abusive past. Abusive or bad past doesn’t make you evil. If one is good , they will always be good , like Kaira or even the Shinghus and the Maheswaris. They all have faced worst scenarios in their lives , unfair situations, death or closed ones , blamed for no faults n what not.

Vedika's is not at all a good human being , she forgot that Naira is Kartik’s love of life , she is the woman Kartik was mourning for those 5 years and most importantly she is mother of his ailing son who he treats as his priority now. Any good human will try to understand the situation instead of jumping on the bed to take over her husband , creating arguments out of nowhere, talking rudely to the ex wife, thinking about the ex-wife getting killed somehow ... the list about Vedika’s evilness goes on. If at all she wasn’t wrong in the abusive past then why is she getting blackmailed, why is she giving money to the same person who abused her and now she has let him enter the house which gave her protection and shelter. Dint question her when she was blatantly lying about her whereabouts for weeks, she is getting that amount of trust from non trusting non thankful people like Goenkas and this is how she is paying them back 🤣

Originally posted by: Indira1211

this is so true..in Silsila badalte rishta ...drashti Dhamis character nandini was of an abused wife ...she was physically beaten where she even lost her baby...she had broken bones and cuts and bruises..she was also emotionally traumatized ...her husband even tried to use her as a call girl...but her friend saves her from this abusive marriage and then she goes and falls in love with her friends husband and has an extra marital affair with him...and you know what..she was so hated..the viewers couldn’t stand her..they trolled and abused her ..because she broke her friends marriage ..so even though she was a battered wife she got no sympathy because she became a Home wrecker..her character was so hated that she was killed off In the show and the actress left the show..yes she was the lead actress and she left the show and the second female lead who was her friend and the male leads wife became the female lead..and then the show became her story..So yes home wreckers get no sympathy ..no matter what they’ve been through ..💁🏻‍♀️

Becoz they want to show something that mostly not shown in itv in every show where third angle mostly in bad light or negative one to show again milan between leads or couples so mostly show third person as villain but here in yrrkh they try something different their they show it is not necessary that always third person between lovers or couple is negative may be he/she is positive or victim but I think they fail to show seeing vedika science it not look like that she look negative not a positive or victim one but CVS in decision that they show something different something unique or villainess but not turn up like that so better they show what they good in or may be like other show their third person bulid up as negative it look more realistic now becoz every angle vedika is look like same as negative villain of itv she is no different only not do any heavy plot only small plan she make but big one in this process she not look like positive or victim but dump one

That why in show silsila badlate rishte also not work This type of track never accepted no one accepted a person who came between two peoples couples so why makers show it's more good if they vedika as negative aur agar ko negative mein third angle nahi show so it's better skip that type of tracks better to show good and realistic tracks which are CVS in good.

Originally posted by: NeeruNira

Becoz they want to show something that mostly not shown in itv in every show where third angle mostly in bad light or negative one to show again milan between leads or couples so mostly show third person as villain but here in yrrkh they try something different their they show it is not necessary that always third person between lovers or couple is negative may be he/she is positive or victim but I think they fail to show seeing vedika science it not look like that she look negative not a positive or victim one but CVS in decision that they show something different something unique or villainess but not turn up like that so better they show what they good in or may be like other show their third person bulid up as negative it look more realistic now becoz every angle vedika is look like same as negative villain of itv she is no different only not do any heavy plot only small plan she make but big one in this process she not look like positive or victim but dump one

That why in show silsila badlate rishte also not work This type of track never accepted no one accepted a person who came between two peoples couples so why makers show it's more good if they vedika as negative aur agar ko negative mein third angle nahi show so it's better skip that type of tracks better to show good and realistic tracks which are CVS in good.

Originally posted by: Indira1211

I think both nandini from silsila and vedika here are selfish ...they just want their own happiness. In silsila nandini didn’t care about hurting her friend ..she still took her friends husband ...and here vedika doesn’t care whether karthik still loves naira or not ...she just wants her position as his wife... so they both are not downright villains or vamps ..they are just selfish ..which makes them grey shaded, where sometimes their conscience tells them not to be selfish . But then their own selfishness takes control and they just go after their own happiness..

Ya their motive is zabardasti couples ki life mein aana aur destroy their relationship for their selfish motive but here makers make them positive or victim too but it not look like that people never like that type of character ya it's good shown a third person 's as positive not always they are negative but eventually they turn up as selfish or home breaker no one synthesis them aaise character ko build up karna bahut difficult hota hai bahut strong story or acting chahiye but here yrtkh CVS failed miserably they not justice with this even the actor pankhuri also not fails to show it or create it she look dump sometimes selfish but not positive or victim type

Even the years ages movie of sharukh rani kabhi alvida na khena also criticise so much even I think the may be wrong becoz bahut time ho gaya hai the character of rani and sharukh also not accept by odience so it's difficult to show this type of charaters aur pankhuri is not good in this she not justice with her roke here no prob with pankhuri she is a good actors but in positive only ir may be with negative one but not this type of character where she is as selfish but shown victim and positive one she fails to show this type of grey shade.

But u all think is good this track is end now and CVS show now some new tracks

Originally posted by: NeeruNira

Becoz they want to show something that mostly not shown in itv in every show where third angle mostly in bad light or negative one to show again milan between leads or couples so mostly show third person as villain but here in yrrkh they try something different their they show it is not necessary that always third person between lovers or couple is negative may be he/she is positive or victim but I think they fail to show seeing vedika science it not look like that she look negative not a positive or victim one but CVS in decision that they show something different something unique or villainess but not turn up like that so better they show what they good in or may be like other show their third person bulid up as negative it look more realistic now becoz every angle vedika is look like same as negative villain of itv she is no different only not do any heavy plot only small plan she make but big one in this process she not look like positive or victim but dump one

That why in show silsila badlate rishte also not work This type of track never accepted no one accepted a person who came between two peoples couples so why makers show it's more good if they vedika as negative aur agar ko negative mein third angle nahi show so it's better skip that type of tracks better to show good and realistic tracks which are CVS in good.

I would have agreed with you...but the major part of being positive and a victim is that no matter what you will always remember what happened with you. You already know the pain of being a victim...so if vedika from starting was a character who was a victim of abuse and turned out positive.... she was ought to be the one who will understand pain the most. Pain of loosing loved ones...pain of being manipulated...pain of being used like a trash to fulfill ones motive. Then how come she did the same with naira ?? She was shown positive and victim then how in her right mind a person could do this ? She claims to love kartik...but fails to understand a single thing about him. She cares least about surekha...or kartik...or kairav.

When you are victim of a abuse. .there are mostly two outcomes. One where the person becomes positive and would never in their right minds would inflict pain on others. And other is a negative one who will manipulate the same way the person was manipulated.

So in silsila...the other women ...was saved by her friend....and she backstabbed her. That is not positive.... Just because you are a victim that doesnt automatically give us right to make others victim. And this is not new....this is called revenge...where a person says...mere sath ye hua mein dusro ke sath bhi yehi krugi.

Also vedika...is a baf character. She pretends to be positive but does its opposite. She repents her mistake...but wants herself in a life where her husband is weeping. She from started said ki agar naira ayi toh mein khud sath karugi. She broke a home...knowing that they love each other. She manipulated situation into her favour by creating a scene at mehndi instead of sitting with kartik and talking like a frnd she claims to be.

So no what you are saying...i dont think she is that character.

Vedika can never show any sign of being a positive charecter. If so she would have admitted her past ,the moment Akshat entered GV. Before she was kidnapped she chanted..I have to tell Kartik ( ,hundred times )in the hotel room and called him there purposely. Why didn’t she do that when Kartik questioned her after he was freed from jail? She made a story and avoided telling truth. She did not even think that Kartik who had to be in jail because of her deserves to know her truth. I wonder what positivity is left in her that is visible only to the creatives and very few who defend her without logic.