is Akshara right or wrong??? - Page 2

Originally posted by: kdiya1234

Is there is no duty of naitik as rashmi 's brother to interrogate about Sameer..What about his family members..They are present only to give lectures..Akshara's fault is seen , What about Rashmi who even too not told that to her family..I find Naitik & his family members more responsible for this situation...Is Naitik good for nothing in show..If yes, I can say Akshara at fault ..If not then Naitik's responsibility is more than Akshara but Bhai Saab kuch karna nahiin per dikhate hain ki sab kuch wahin karte hain..Akshara ko galat kehne se pehle Naitik ke bombay trip Sameer ko jaanne ke liye jane ko yaad karna..Stupidity of naitik & Singhania's here..Uff naatak company whole Singhania's are.

Originally posted by: anishathegr8

Can you explain me The way devyani talked to Akshara & blamed her ..Was it right?..But her way of talking is not the same with rashmi just becoz Akshara is daughter in law & rashmi is daughter..Why can't devyani reveal her suspicion to rajbanna & to other members..She can take help of rajashri but can't discuss it with Singhania's..What an absurd behavior of devyani..You can't press every fault in Akshara..Also look at other characters too..Naitik aur unki family ki koi galti nahin hai kya?

Originally posted by: -Maryam

She should but does naitik even mind??
He didnt say a word to her abt it ? He doesnt mind then why do we 😛

Originally posted by: Mini2013

Basically, don't hide important things from the family.😃