akshara did not distribute the property equally

Page

Next Last

xyze

@xyze

Navigator

Posted: 12 years ago

just saw the sbs segment.

it showed akshara preparing a pie diagram to distribute the wealth.initially all had equal share but then she cut down on naitik's n rashmi's share n added it to nandini's.so nandini had the maximum share n naitik n rashmi had the rest divided equally.

1.now what are your views on this?

2.was akshara right in doing so?

3.will this create chaos in the family?

please share your views and predictions😃

personally i had expected her to distribute it equally..seeing that she was so determined to keep everybody happy n did not want to discriminate.i have feeling it will irk ga3 more than the children.

the segment also showed akshara saying about yash being adopted n the kid heard it n got upset.so it seems like a lot of relationship troubles coming up for akshara

Edited by xyze - 12 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

kala_09

@kala_09

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

dear she did becoz nandini didnt get any thing becoz of mohit during her marriage and rasmi has every thing even i think nk too will agree with this, def some drama there but i think nk will fully support ak .

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

preksha

@pree4ru

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

Well i guess what akshi did was right why coz Naitik is capable enough and handles entire Singhania office i mean he is the MD , second is rashmi is married of into a rich family or shud i say a family with good income but Nandini financial status isnt that good and mohit works as an emplyee and as per BMa talks his jobs arent stable so in such cases giving more to nandini is justifed , coming chaos i guess seeing rashmi-gaya3 talk on fri epi they might be trouble creator .

Quote

kala_09

@kala_09

Rocker

Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: pree4ru
Well i guess what akshi did was right why coz Naitik is capable enough and handles entire Singhania office i mean he is the MD , second is rashmi is married of into a rich family or shud i say a family with good income but Nandini financial status isnt that good and mohit works as an emplyee and as per BMa talks his jobs arent stable so in such cases giving more to nandini is justifed , coming chaos i guess seeing rashmi-gaya3 talk on fri epi they might be trouble creator .

correct pree i too feel what ak did is right. even i feel nk too will agree with ak, haan def big drama and twist on the way gay3 and rasmi will not leave any thing def i feel they will not accept ak decision but we have to wait and watch what is stored for us its just my POV.

Quote

xyze

@xyze

Navigator

Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: kala_09
dear she did becoz nandini didnt get any thing becoz of mohit during her marriage and rasmi has every thing even i think nk too will agree with this, def some drama there but i think nk will fully support ak .

but is it justified enough? i mean nandini knew mohit's status and his principles before marriage.she wasn't forced into the marriage.about naitik it is fine since he understands akshara and will stand by her no matter what😛.but don't you feel nandini and rashmi should have had equal shares.in our family they always distribute equally among daughters irrespective of their individual financial status.it is not only about the daughters but also abt samdhis respect.one shouldn't feel neglected over the other.

and about rashmi.right now she has everything so she doesn't require anything from singhanias.but who knows the future...if her sasural faces some financial crisis and she is in a condition worse than nandini.what will they do then? rashmi might come n complain then due to her needs.wouldn't ga3 n rb blame akshara for not securing rashmi's future the same like nandini(i have a feeling this might happen.cv's will get enough drama from this track)

Edited by xyze - 12 years ago

Quote

Shruthi

@shruthi.sweety

Dazzler

Posted: 12 years ago

chalo...g3 ko mauka mil gayi..phir se chandalikha banne ki...🤢
actually i agree with ak...nk aur rashmi ko koi problem nahi...rashmi to karodpathi ki bahu hain...basically nandu ko requirement hain...
waise bhi us dein g3 BM se badi badi baat kar rahi thi na ki "hum kamzor bachhon ko zyada imp dena chayiye"...🤢
watever i m sure nk will support ak...😃

Quote

paripriya

@paripriya

Explorer

Posted: 12 years ago

Agree..akshara will be in bg trouble now...

Quote

Naksh_Duggu

@Naksh_Duggu

Inactive

Posted: 12 years ago

I think Akshara did the right thing and it has got nothing to do with Nandini's physically challenge or Mohit's financial status.

According to me she has divided property perfectly between two brothers i.e Daddaji and Rajshekhar singhania. Daddaji has only daughter so she gets his whole share i.e half property and remaining half gets divided between naitik and rashmi equally.

In my point of view, Akshara is fair and justified daddaji's trust in her.

You go girl...:)

Quote

paripriya

@paripriya

Explorer

Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: Naksh_Duggu
I think Akshara did the right thing and it has got nothing to do with Nandini's physically challenge or Mohit's financial status.

According to me she has divided property perfectly between two brothers i.e Daddaji and Rajshekhar singhania. Daddaji has only daughter so she gets his whole share i.e half property and remaining half gets divided between naitik and rashmi equally.

In my point of view, Akshara is fair and justified daddaji's trust in her.

You go girl...:)

what a logic...each child shld be treated equally...nt by their parents or their financial conditions...but this sure there wil be hugedrama on this matter n surely akshara reason wil be different nt like u have given...

Edited by paripriya - 12 years ago

Quote

Naksh_Duggu

@Naksh_Duggu

Inactive

Posted: 12 years ago

#10

Originally posted by: paripriya
what a lame logic...each child shld be treated equally...nt by their parents or their financial conditions...but this sure there wil be hugedrama on this matter n surely akshara reason wil be different nt like u have given...

Sorry but if you don't agree with me it's ok but that does not give you any right to call my view as lame.

And I find nothing lame in it. It's a property created by daddaji and Rajshekhar singhania. So it should be divided between them and that's logical according to me cause they are still alive. Further this property get divided between their children, as daddaji has only daughter she gets his share and Rajshekhar has two children so it gets divided between them. According to me that's fair. There is no unjustice to anyone. Each child is treated equally according to their father's share in the property.

If you don't agree you can ignore my post but don't insult my views.

Quote

1 2 3

akshara did not distribute the property equally

Related Topics

Explore Topics