Originally posted by: _naksh_raz
Ok,great to know that Pearlali,seriously I don't like arguing or lowing others for someone elses comfort,its a cheap thing and no I am not talking about you,its a general thing!!So far your topics have been very negative towards Akshara,as you thing she is a cry baby and all,ok fine you like Akshara,but there are many stronger characters who don't cry,try those other shows,maybe then you can have your share of laughter...and soRry if I should rude or too frank
Not at all i dont mind at all but when i am liking 2 characters of the same show my opinions if can change the lead role the show will be more stronger than boring pain in the neck. And going to other show do you know you just closed the whole show u loose one audience or ten ask a performer all a performers struggle not even to loose one audience that is the talent of the performer that is the addiction of the performer i think i am talking to teenagers i think i shoud excuse myself very much understandable unamaturity towards understanding the depth of the tale, depth of emotions depth of want. But really pity i feel that todays teenagers dont want to learn more to enhance their knowledge they want to put a full stop to it that is the reason that we keep dreaming why we arent like the people of 1947 how did they do it and why cant we do it today because today our intention of learning more is gone probably. Ok fine i am sick of it stop it, no if you read Shakespeare's life, if you read Taan Sains life if you read Mirza Ghalib's life if poetry if you read Rambrandt's life if his paintings than we all still will be like 1947 people and craving of why we are not like that will end.
You see if a prosecutor is good blaming the victim than to win the case the defence has to be equally good to avict the victim which i am sorry i didnt find except glamour no character is not glamour if you are a writer you would know character is what Pinochio was to his maker for you its a beautiful painting on the wall ask its painter what it is he will be writing one whole book to define what it is he created and yet he wont be satisfied but ofcourse he knows my paintings can be worth nothing in an exhibition like what Rambrandt faced in his days but today he is Rambrandt the great but each loss of exhibition the painter paints another doesnt stop painting it is what he is he should become a poet when he is a painter or should he draw another painting to win the exhibition.
I have no complains when all of you do becasue for me it is confirmed you are teenagers ofcourse you would lack those qualities of an adult but just disappointed that you all are not even eager to learn that is the reason we are not Ghandijee if they were a saddoo in the end but first they learnt how to be British than they left bing British and became a saddoo their identity if you have seen the movie Gandi see first you have to learn British exactly what British did they never taught you English but they learnt Urdu/Hindi in order to stabilize their rule to rule they needed to communicate how you learn English or they learn Hindi in the same manner the leaders of 47 all learnt first English than they were able to break the rule of British if they didnt know English how would they have told their point of view British just knew Hindi enough to communicate idhar a-o tum kiya karta hay but they learnt English enough to fight for their rights which is the English law not the Hindustani law flourished in America during 47 fight for your rights and British couldnt deny that after the conference so do you Aksh fans know how to defend (creativity) her unnessary crying stand up or no let the British rule its good as good it is meaning i know a bunch of Akshs no show a bunch of Varshas smarter to advice all the time instead of asking advice all the time.
See that adalaat program how good she is she knows on the spot the criminal among both the parties yet she hears both the sides still when she knows who is the criminal yet she is suppose to hear the other side her experience tuaght her to know who is the criminal polishing of her studies is experience but yet she is suppose to hear the other party thats the law yet the other party says just shutup British law just shutup spare the rod spoil the child no times have changed no more rods thats brutality todays law no defend stand up have words enough to defend your point prosecution has stated she is a criminal and defence is saying shutup even the judge dear cant say that even the judge will have to say defence say something or i will have to say guilty.😵