now why was she saying that naitik is innocent? what's the point of defending him when she has to return in the bedroom with golgappa face? she's the one who needs to understand this fact...therez no need to convince gayitri abt it ! she knows naitik cannot do any such thing....it's very sad tht naitik didn't tell gayitri...stupid man he cannot see & think beyond Akshara ! he lost Gayitri's trust....
coming back to akshara, if she's so much convinced that it was a MU b/w naitik and sneha then why is she angry with him ? what is it that she's unable to forget? she thinks that it's naitik's mistak e that he wanted her attention coz she devoted a lot of time to him and for that extra overtime , she's helpless coz she has too many responsibilities?
exactly my question.... whn she can defend him in front of duniya... thn y cant she trust him???? & if she really beleive tat he was innocent thn y angry hone ka naatak???? is she in her senses???😡
25