Viji thread for 9/22/2017

Originally posted by: ramishi

Ishita and all others can forgive and forget whatever shagun has done but not ready to give param similar treatment.

Shagun tried to kill ishita...endangered kids life...caused psychological trauma to kids...but will be given chance after chance just because she gave birth and can give birth whenever needed...but a person who has no criminal record after that initial days of YHM, who never used his daughter to torture bhallas and simmi...is still seen with suspicion...what a hypocrite people the bhallas and iyers are including ishita...rules are different for shagun and param when the truth is param sins are nothing compared to the CVs laadly

After raman's revenge ends...it seems simmi will start her against ishita.

Bala has become a joru ka gulam already...lets see if bala and kiran plan for their own kid or not...or will kiran join mihika and ishita on the list of ladies who never got the joy of giving birth to a child.

Originally posted by: zohakhan7

@bold hilarious

u r calling a father's emotions,his protectiveness towards his daughter a revenge

Wow ,I m amazed 👏

No offence to u

Originally posted by: ramishi

Not talking and ignoring your wife, not taking puja aarthi just because your wife choose your daughter over you is called father's emotions?

Ignoring your daughter ...snatching her project and giving it to your son who works in the same office is called father's emotion?

throwing your adolescent daughter because she rebeled is called father's emotion?

not tending to your wife's wound after you hurt her is called father's emotion?

This is how a father shows his emotion in real world?😲

Raman is right in opposing ruhi's alliance with nikhil but his actions are no way justified...in my opinion

During Gulabo track when ishita moved to mani's place with kids, so many people termed it as ishita's revenge in some thread...but i didn't see anyone calling it her emotion or finding the post hilarious...may be most of them in that thread were of same opinion or perhaps they can only see a father's emotion but not mother's or wife's emotion

you can call it a father's emotion but sorry i can't because whatever little experience i have i don't think a father and husband will behave like this when their children or wife go against his wish.

Clapping and saying no offence to you does not go hand in hand

After watching yesterdays episode and reading the comments, here are my 2 cents :

First of all coming down to the comments

Am amazed to see so many people still calling Ishita as bhaanj and blaming that for Bhallas she is just an aaya. I am sorry at these peoples thoughts as I don't recall any track or moment after the generation leap that these terms had been used by any of the Bhalla member. In fact it was never used by Bhalla members except by Raman who had last used it when he felt that Ruhi was dead. I feel it is these audience who has not forgotten this fact and to justify Ishita they only have this point so they keep playing this card. I would like to say to these type of audience that GROW UP !! Stop dragging old things into every track . Lets treat every track as an individual, cause this is how CV's treat it. If we don't treat every track individually then we can't get the real crux of the track and we will only keep bashing people.

Coming down to yesterdays episode ---

Ruhi's arrogance and adamancy came to the fore. It was real bad on CV's part to show that when the child said she wouldn't apologize to her father the mother kept mumb. I know it is a very critical stage but Ishita would have looked in good light if only she could have said " We would talk about this later on. First let's go and apologize to Romi. Then came the second phase where the ladies had gone for shopping and came out looking all happy. The missing scene was Ruhi not trying to apologize to Mihika who was also angry with her or Ishita trying to apologize on behalf of Ruhi to Mihika would have been nice. These little detailing itself binds the story and makes it relatable. The scene of Raman apologizing to Mihika was nice.

Raman He is worried sick for his daughter because of the relationship she is in but the steps which he is shown to be taking would only make one more rebellious. Setting limits doesn't mean that he snatches away the projects from her, in fact give her more projects so that she becomes more busy and forgets about any other thing. Secondly, Mihika's statement of setting limits was right but what needs to be taken into consideration is that the age for setting limits for Adi and Ruhi is gone. Adi is married whereas Ruhi has already turned 18 or 19, an adult. They are used to doing things in their own way so setting limits now would mean making them rebellious. The only way to deal with them is by listening patiently to them and becoming their friends, then only can a parent stear them away from the looming dangers.

Raman's behaviour is very unbelievable right now as He was the one who was shown to be very cool and giving these advices of becoming a friend of Adi etc when Adi was in his teens and Ishita was being stupid. So this behaviour of Raman is unjustified by CV's to show Ishita as mahaan. CV's need to understand that they can tell the story of an adamant teen in love with older man in a straight way also rather by trying to put the parents on 2 different paths.

The next part of molestation :

Kiran's reaction to Param and Kshitija's scene was OTT. She could have been stern and told Param that she would not like him touching her daughter while talking to her and later said the same thing to Kshitija firmly, rather than making such a scene. I do agree that Its difficult to put ones trust on a molester, but then the track record of Param has become clean after the leap so not standing for him by IshRa was something i couldn't understand, maybe they kept quiet as this topic came out suddenly and it must have struck them that just maybe Kiran might have seen Param doing something wrong with Kshitija and supporting Param then would put them in wrong spot, so they wanted to sit and then talk about it after getting all the details.

Originally posted by: ramishi

Not talking and ignoring your wife, not taking puja aarthi just because your wife choose your daughter over you is called father's emotions?

Ignoring your daughter ...snatching her project and giving it to your son who works in the same office is called father's emotion?

throwing out your adolescent daughter because she rebelled is called father's emotion?

not tending to your wife's wound after you hurt her is called father's emotion?

This is how a father shows his emotion in real world?😲

Raman is right in opposing ruhi's alliance with nikhil but his actions are no way justified...in my opinion

During Gulabo track when ishita moved to mani's place with kids, so many people termed it as ishita's revenge in some thread...but i didn't see anyone calling it her emotion or finding the post hilarious...may be most of them in that thread were of same opinion or perhaps they can only see a father's emotion but not mother's or wife's emotion

you can call it a father's emotion but sorry i can't because whatever little experience i have i don't think a father and husband will behave like this when their children or wife go against his wish.

Clapping and saying no offence to you does not go hand in hand

Originally posted by: ramishi

Not talking and ignoring your wife, not taking puja aarthi just because your wife choose your daughter over you is called father's emotions?

Ignoring your daughter ...snatching her project and giving it to your son who works in the same office is called father's emotion?

throwing out your adolescent daughter because she rebelled is called father's emotion?

not tending to your wife's wound after you hurt her is called father's emotion?

This is how a father shows his emotion in real world?😲

Raman is right in opposing ruhi's alliance with nikhil but his actions are no way justified...in my opinion

During Gulabo track when ishita moved to mani's place with kids, so many people termed it as ishita's revenge in some thread...but i didn't see anyone calling it her emotion or finding the post hilarious...may be most of them in that thread were of same opinion or perhaps they can only see a father's emotion but not mother's or wife's emotion

you can call it a father's emotion but sorry i can't because whatever little experience i have i don't think a father and husband will behave like this when their children or wife go against his wish.

Clapping and saying no offence to you does not go hand in hand