Yeh Hai Mohabbatein OR Yeh Kaisi Yeh Mohabbatein? - Page 3

Originally posted by: --Megha--

Rofl grav thats quite an imagination - ShaMani 😛 but lets see what cvs do.

Originally posted by: gravity23

I dunno...I feel if Mani is used as a means of driving Shagun from BHALLA HOUSE...it might work...All Shagun needs is a rich guy with power and loads of cash and NO BRAINS...to put up with her...Anyway, Mani needs a full-time woman taking care of his children...they can strike a deal...My POV...totally

Mani can be negative just for Sagun...as for her...yeah...she might eventually be paired with ASHOK..But I still feel...pairing with Mani and executing it right can make us laugh more than this nonsense

This current track is weird, everyone is so out of character and that's why it appears Shagun is a dumbo but she was kinda cunningly manipulative and quite good at that too. If she behaved like a classy vamp this track could have been a masterstroke. CVs, instead, preferred to follow their known path---over glorify the female lead in every aspect possible. In the process, they butchered all other characters. They somehow needed it after the Mani track and the ridiculous Shagun-Ashok wedding fiasco as the female lead's character hit the lowest point. But they failed this time as well coz they tried to walk down the same path like previous two tracks---unrealistically over glorify the female lead.

Yes, they can always pair up Mani and Shagun and shoo her away from Bhalla house. But that would be a temporary remedy coz her pairing up with Mani means she won't be able to nag IshRa persistently as Mani will come between her and them. Ashok being reformed and Shagun being tamed down, the show will be left with no antagonist! So eventually Shagun-Mani have to break up...

Originally posted by: ankitasen

This current track is weird, everyone is so out of character and that's why it appears Shagun is a dumbo but she was kinda cunningly manipulative and quite good at that too. If she behaved like a classy vamp this track could have been a masterstroke. CVs, instead, preferred to follow their known path---over glorify the female lead in every aspect possible. In the process, they butchered all other characters. They somehow needed it after the Mani track and the ridiculous Shagun-Ashok wedding fiasco as the female lead's character hit the lowest point. But they failed this time as well coz they tried to walk down the same path like previous two tracks---unrealistically over glorify the female lead.

Yes, they can always pair up Mani and Shagun and shoo her away from Bhalla house. But that would be a temporary remedy coz her pairing up with Mani means she won't be able to nag IshRa persistently as Mani will come between her and them. Ashok being reformed and Shagun being tamed down, the show will be left with no antagonist! So eventually Shagun-Mani have to break up...

Originally posted by: gravity23

Maybe romance ke bahane we'll knw if Ishita ever crossed the holding hands-pecking on the cheek-line with Subbu... I would jump off my terrace if I get to know Ishita isnt as inexperienced as she might pretend to be ;)

Oh! That part is sorted, Ishita is hell inexperienced. 😆 Don't think she ever crossed the line, that part is buried with Mihika's "virginity" clarification from CVs and Ishita's taking it as a parameter of being an ideal woman.
And, pecking on the check line with Subbu?! That's a strict no-no too 😆...Ishita quite clearly mentioned she's inexperienced in this field too as she implicitly explained it to Raman the other day that it's her first marriage so she didn't experience such intimacy before (pecking cheek).
Now I understand the reason behind the renowned dialogue "CHEE"...😆

Originally posted by: ankitasen

Oh! That part is sorted, Ishita is hell inexperienced. 😆 Don't think she ever crossed the line, that part is buried with Mihika's "virginity" clarification from CVs and Ishita's taking it as a parameter of being an ideal woman.
And, pecking on the check line with Subbu?! That's a strict no-no too 😆...Ishita quite clearly mentioned she's inexperienced in this field too as she implicitly explained it to Raman the other day that it's her first marriage so she didn't experience such intimacy before (pecking cheek).
Now I understand the reason behind the renowned dialogue "CHEE"...😆

Originally posted by: gravity23

Hahaha..You make me laugh...See...I think Ishita took it as a parameter of an ideal woman when it came to the forefront that NO MAN, OTHER THAN MIHIKA'S FIANCE had slept with her or something...😛 Im sure she wouldn't have minded if Mihir would've taken Mihika to the moon and back...under sultry satiny sheets🤣 As long as Mihika "surrenders' herself to the man INTENDED for ;p

As for Ishita having NO experience..from my days in the University,Ive known of the quietest girls in our circle having experience in, and LIKING rough s**...I was shocked...coz obviously...you dont expect cute-looking frilly fragile girls saying such things, even to their friends...when al you've seen them doing is listening to soulful music and poring over thickset books...but then...Kya pata, Ishita ka bhi koi raaz ho?

Maybe she's scared of telling Raman about it...or something...MOST INDIAN WOMEN ARE TERRIFIED...So I wouldnt be surprised..Plus, she's an IYER...That would be a double Grand Slam on her reputation :p...Maybe she was just as terrified with Subbu...and he had to chant Tamil hymns and mantras to calm her down before the act...Who knows?? Mayb Subbu was so familiar to her..him in his plain shirt and oiled hair, neatly combed...gingerly approaching her...rather than Raman, throwing condoms in the drawer...with a confident swagger of, "Come, try me"...🤣

Well, Mrs Jaffer was asked in an interview why Ishita is unmarried as the custody novel Ishita was a divorcee. The writer said she wanted this Ishita to be unmarried and virgin. Yes, she used the word virgin. So, that's the end of all speculation...😆

To be honest, Ishita is always portrayed like an inexperienced one starting from her discomfort of wearing sleeveless churidaar to Param's discovering the fact that she never experienced the pleasure of being in a man's arms for carnal activity ...😉

Originally posted by: ankitasen

Well, Mrs Jaffer was asked in an interview why Ishita is unmarried as the custody novel Ishita was a divorcee. The writer said she wanted this Ishita to be unmarried and virgin. Yes, she used the word virgin. So, that's the end of all speculation...😆

To be honest, Ishita is always portrayed like an inexperienced one starting from her discomfort of wearing sleeveless churidaar to Param's discovering the fact that she never experienced the pleasure of being in a man's arms for carnal activity ...😉

Originally posted by: gravity23

What do you mean she said unmarried and VIRGIN?? How can a scriptwriter writing an URBAN romance for a leading Telly channel say that??😡

Yeah...I remeber she gave away her sexy husband-gifted gown to his ex-wife...mera sawaal yeh hai, ki Subbu 12 SAALON MEIN KAR KYA RAHA THA?? Ek toh kuch kiya nahin...and achanak se hi...use infertility report se prob ho gayi hai?

Because she's catering for a daily soap audience after all. 😆 But I don't think the virgin thing is too much to digest, there are conservative ones who don't prefer to get intimate before marriage. Ishita being an IYER perfectly fits with the tone. So, I wasn't shocked seeing her character sketch like that and even Mihika, the firecracker, told her the then fiance to stay in limits when he tried to get intimate with her before marriage.

12 years is not that long if you consider that she started dating him at 14. Agaar Mihir being the mature adult inn 4 saalo main kuch nahi kiya toh Subbu kya karega? 😆

Originally posted by: ankitasen

Because she's catering for a daily soap audience after all. 😆 But I don't think the virgin thing is too much to digest, there are conservative ones who don't prefer to get intimate before marriage. Ishita being an IYER perfectly fits with the tone. So, I wasn't shocked seeing her character sketch like that and even Mihika, the firecracker, told her the then fiance to stay in limits when he tried to get intimate with her before marriage.

12 years is not that long if you consider that she started dating him at 14. Agaar Mihir being the mature adult inn 4 saalo main kuch nahi kiya toh Subbu kya karega? 😆

Originally posted by: gravity23

I dunno...somehow...saying that in ur interviews isnt very pretty...she couldve just said she wanted to sketch the female lead in a conservative way...am sure there are lots of Iyer girls who have done the 'unmentionable' 🤣

See..am sure Mihir-Mihika atleast KISSED...so if in 4 yrs they kissed, am sure Ish-Subbu wudve done SOMETHING in triple that time no?? :p

Even if she didn't say that thing, it wouldn't have made much of a difference, story-wise. Anyone can easily guess why the CVs omitted Ishita from being a divorcee here. Yes, the thought is regressive. and that's why we argued showing Mihika as "virgin". Not that, we doubted her virginity but that was NOT needed as they simply could have mentioned she didn't sleep with Ashok. But the CVs wanted to kill two birds with one stone...

Yes, they would have done SOMETHING if it were Mihika instead of Ishu 🤣