not too logical

Page

Next Last

peace..

@peace..

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

d fact that ashok made raman resign deliberately wasnt really brought out by ishita by showing the clip. nobody clarified y raman resigned, just assumed he was forced to resign and reinstated him. 😆 d whole reasoning wasnt very clear.

Edited by peace.. - 11 years ago

Quote

Frequent Posters

abhilasha_dream

@abhilasha_dream

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 11 years ago

Agree. .. its not as if the whole entrepreneurs association has only 2 businewsmen, if Raman resigned at his own will (remember the association is unaware about the whole blackmail fiasco), Ashok is not good for Presidentship then give it to the third person who is capable as well as willing to take up the post sincerely.

The association could have taken time, discussed and announced the name later on.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

peace..

@peace..

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: abhilasha_dream
Agree. .. its not as if the whole entrepreneurs association has only 2 businewsmen, if Raman resigned at his own will (remember the association is unaware about the whole blackmail fiasco), Ashok is not good for Presidentship then give it to the third person who is capable as well as willing to take up the post sincerely.

The association could have taken time, discussed and announced the name later on.

seriously! exactly my point 😊

Quote

--Megha--

@--Megha--

Sparkler

Posted: 11 years ago

😆 True but cvs defied the logic by showing Raman in a bathrobe 😆

Quote

peace..

@peace..

Rocker

+ 4

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: mnr123
😆 True but cvs defied the logic by showing Raman in a bathrobe 😆

🤣 chalo kahin to smartness dikhayee cvs ne..

Quote

Sree

@Katyayani_devi

Trailblazer

+ 6

Posted: 11 years ago

seems in yhm land business associations work like tat only n they were only two business presidents/kings only i.e raman-ashok n it's yhm land logic lol.

Quote

Sandysprings

@Sandysprings

Dazzler

Posted: 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Savz_Startling
seems in yhm land business associations work like tat only n they were only two business presidents/kings only i.e raman-ashok n it's yhm land logic lol.

Exactly...😆

Quote

Vedika211

@Vedika211

Inactive

Posted: 11 years ago

I know. I was thinking that just yesterday I made a post about how realistic this show was, and 'ouch'!

Also, just because Suraj said that Ashok would help is not direct proof against Ashok in any way. Ashok is not responsible for what his brother says or does in any way. And I'm not even a lawyer!

The most damning thing they did was sign an affidavit saying that they will withdraw their complain in return for the presidentship. Now that's clear cause for Ashok's removal, but no one seems to think so.

Quote

Aeryn

@Aeryn

Voyager

Posted: 11 years ago

Glad I am not the only one thinking that way.

I wasn't impressed with the solution given tonight, didn't like it

The video didn't prove a thing except Suraj being into illegal betting. It didn't prove Ashok's involvement hence his unfitness for the position was still widely debatable...

Proving that Ashok blackmailed his way to the presidentship would have been more fitting

What was shown tonight didn't make a lot of sense...worse the whole video thing put Ishra in a questionable light IMO...