Official theories thread - Page 5

Originally posted by: BeingBlunt

True. I think SPMB touched on this too that Bhism Pratigya was stupid and wrong. 😆

I remember in 9th std my teacher said that it was Bheeshm's vow that was major reason for MB.. had he not taken that vow nd ruled Hastinapur things wouldnt hv gone that way.

Originally posted by: RainOfDew

I remember in 9th std my teacher said that it was Bheeshm's vow that was major reason for MB.. had he not taken that vow nd ruled Hastinapur things wouldnt hv gone that way.

Many people say so, but I dont understand the rationale behind it. I mean lets think of a parallel universe where Bheeshm didnt take any vow, he became the king of Hastinapur, married two wives Amb and Abl. Later they had children say P2 and D2

Now D2 is elder, but has some physical deformities so P2 is made the king of Hastinapur, later P2 does some crime and is exiled when D2 is given the responsibility of state.

Later they have children. How is this scenario different from present Mahabharat? Bheeshm's vow might be useless but they definitely didn't lead to Mahabharat as many want to believe. That is like what the promo of SuryaPutra Karna showed that ek Swayamvar jisne badal diya Bharat ka itihas like Draupadi rejected Karna was the reason for Mahabharat.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Many people say so, but I dont understand the rationale behind it. I mean lets think of a parallel universe where Bheeshm didnt take any vow, he became the king of Hastinapur, married two wives Amb and Abl. Later they had children say P2 and D2

Now D2 is elder, but has some physical deformities so P2 is made the king of Hastinapur, later P2 does some crime and is exiled when D2 is given the responsibility of state.

Later they have children. How is this scenario different from present Mahabharat? Bheeshm's vow might be useless but they definitely didn't lead to Mahabharat as many want to believe. That is like what the promo of SuryaPutra Karna showed that ek Swayamvar jisne badal diya Bharat ka itihas like Draupadi rejected Karna was the reason for Mahabharat.

Originally posted by: BeingBlunt

Many people twist Mahabharat according to what they like. 😆 I have always heard that Dyut sabha was the reason of Mahabharat.

I think Dyut Sabha can be called the base of it. Like yes Duryodhon's jealously and insecurities was there and multiple other things, but without DyutSabha, Yudhisthir wouldn't have lost his kingdom for 13 years, then maybe (only maybe) both cousins would have ruled their respective kingdoms and there would have been no Mahabharat

Originally posted by: BeingBlunt

Many people twist Mahabharat according to what they like. 😆 I have always heard that Dyut sabha was the reason of Mahabharat.

I've heard people say Draupadi laughing at Duryodhan was the reason....I'm tired of explaining to them that Draupadi was not even in that scene and Pandavas laughed at him...Blame BRCMB and SPMB....SP one went above and beyond showing that Draupadi was present during that scene but didn't laugh and only smiled and Duryodhan misunderstood that it was her ( it was her handmaidens who laughed and said that infamous "Is the son of a blind man blind as well?" Dialouge) 🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦

Originally posted by: Pete15rogmourey

I've heard people say Draupadi laughing at Duryodhan was the reason....I'm tired of explaining to them that Draupadi was not even in that scene and Pandavas laughed at him...Blame BRCMB and SPMB....SP one went above and beyond showing that Draupadi was present during that scene but didn't laugh and only smiled and Duryodhan misunderstood that it was her ( it was her handmaidens who laughed and said that infamous "Is the son of a blind man blind as well?" Dialouge) 🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦

Now that u mentioned it.. RK went 2 more steps ahead😆 They shown Draupadi saying this again during vastraharan scene🙄

Also during Yudishthir's rajya abhishek they shown Draupadi apologising for saying these words.. like what? She never said that nd they made her apologise to him😡

Originally posted by: RainOfDew

Now that u mentioned it.. RK went 2 more steps ahead😆 They shown Draupadi saying this again during vastraharan scene🙄

Also during Yudishthir's rajya abhishek they shown Draupadi apologising for saying these words.. like what? She never said that nd they made her apologise to him😡

Pagal hai yeh log...

Maybe Kartik is that child 🤣

Originally posted by: Akash3Rai

Maybe Kartik is that child 🤣

OMG

That would be way too interesting

How about Neil being Krishna only? 😆

And Kartik being Draupadi? 🤣🤪

Because it's really looking far fetched that Neil/Yuvika will be couple from Yuvika's side.