Originally posted by: Dr_lamboojee
no doubt, they ruined it the way they have ruined every character including mukta herself
take for example...
mukta started as a brilliant academician
later got jealous and became sort of wicked with an evil mind
later redeemed herself after the rape incident by royal damad
again became jealous, possessive and arrogant to get her man...
similarly, vishnu's character was great to start with but
took a nose-dive with so much disgustful reactions
I know all these are done by CVs...
but when we blame mukta for all his love nautanki
we have to be unbiased for vishnu's character too...
even though CVs make these characters to react the way they do on screen
we (especially me at least) react what is shown on tv
I blame the characters/bash them for their acts on screen, not CVs...
I have a special love for CVs whom I take potshot for their mind-blowing ideas
and story writing skills...
i agree wid u that they showed mkta gud @ studies but that jealousy thing & getting influenced by nanni & luxurious life was there in her.so there i never felt that she was ruined much.but i say even if she was not shown like this still cktwise she was not suitable wid vishnu ever whether shes redeemed or not, gud or bad.
@bold red yes i agree wid u thatswhy i call him spineless & idiot & dumbo & no self-respecting prsn. but we don't bash him much as hes not shown doing such cheap & desperate acts which mkta & aksh were shown. and moreover i never find mkta & aksh behaving way difft than their initial ckt portrayal or as per their basic nature which was shown wen these ckts entered.
but the destruction is visible in the ckts of raghu(gross one),vishnu(2 much) , damini & even jogi(wen these 2 accepted rgahu's blackmailing).
i agree wid ur nxt lines in black that we blame ckts 4 their acts on screen.
@CVs me 2 luv it. btw u rembr initally in this forum esply b4 2nd leap forum members used 2 make CVs AT 4 their these type of acts.