Should Iccha have left the baby in the rain?

I have a question for you all...for all those who hate iccha and Veer for taking care of their dear Tappus kid...who in her benign "nadani" (never hear a more self-deluding euphemism ) left the kid with a strange shady guy in a storm...

What would you have wanted Iccha to do ...?

leave the kid to die in the rain...?

or risk giving it to a police station who would have shunted it to some anath ashram where she would have languished?

Or then followed the trail of the kid and gotten it back to Tappu..(and risk being called even more "mahaan" )

I guess damned if you do and damned if you dont...

I think Tapasya is a complex and interesting character...and fun to watch...but does piling onto Iccha make us any better than Nani?

Those who want to blame ichha just need a reason. They dont think before posting.

Originally posted by: thnkdiffrnt

I have a question for you all...for all those who hate iccha and Veer for taking care of their dear Tappus kid...who in her benign "nadani" (never hear a more self-deluding euphemism ) left the kid with a strange shady guy in a storm...

What would you have wanted Iccha to do ...? Arre , if she would have left kid alone then also ppl would have jumped on her

leave the kid to die in the rain...? want to kill icha kya ??? she will be called shameless friend as she didnot take care of taps kid

or risk giving it to a police station who would have shunted it to some anath ashram where she would have languished? Lol

Or then followed the trail of the kid and gotten it back to Tappu..(and risk being called even more "mahaan" ) ha re, wahi , taps should not say Uff in pain

I guess damned if you do and damned if you dont...

I think Tapasya is a complex and interesting character...and fun to watch...but does piling onto Iccha make us any better than Nani? Complex she used to be , and please she is not interesting she is plain irritating

No ichcha should not have left the baby in the rain.

Originally posted by: tinoo

No ichcha should not have left the baby in the rain.

However, she could have done two things --

1. Left a phone number (she still had her mobile with her) with the chai galla person or someone permanent at the bus-stop -- just in case.

2. Informed the police and told them that the baby will be in her care and to contact her if there was some issue (if she was scared of the baby going to an anathashram). I dont think the police would forcibly keep the baby in the station and forcibly drop off to an anaath ashram if ichcha professed a desire to be care taker of the child until parents are found.

I have no issues with ichcha picking up the baby. What I disliked was her trying to pass off the baby as the dying man's grand daughter so that the baby can inherit a name and money. This was wrong in every sense of the term and deceitful.

Finally, I also feel that before veer and ichcha adopt muktha -- a newspaper ad must be placed in all newspapers that describes the circumstances of finding the baby on the rainy night near the chai galla. So that there is an attempt made to find the real parents.

Ichcha has just made an assumption that someone dumped the child because it was a girl ... but really it can be exactly the situation shown in uttaran -- that someone kidnapped a child because of its jewellery (small gold bangles, chains etc.) and then abandoned it -- or kidnapped it because of some ransom desire but then chickened out and abandonend it after getting scared.

Particularly after Mukta is growing up -- it is obvious that the child belongs to a well-to-do family -- just look at the bone structure of Muktha and the facial structure-- this is a very hatta khatta baby with a very regal face structure. This is obvious even at 8 or 9 months old.

excellent post tinoo..

@nimmi_rra

Bhai...Ichcha did the right thing...how can anyone leave a baby in the rain or leave a phone-no expecting someone to call them...

Originally posted by: tinoo

@nimmi_rra

Rathore and tapasya did place newspaper ads in the beginning. Several ads. That is how everyone (the whole city and bundelas) came to know that the baby was lost.

Unfortunately, ichcha and ammo did not buy newspapers/read them because they had no money so they never saw the ad.

If you remember even veer's ad to get back ichcha, damini saw by accident because a shopkeeper wrapped milk packets in them, and the person dropped the newspaper the milk was wrapped in.

sorry tinoo..

No-- she is actually a sweet individual who is well meaning -- just a bit stupid and lacks worldly-wise ness.

Originally posted by: Voldermoth

Bhai...Ichcha did the right thing...how can anyone leave a baby in the rain or leave a phone-no expecting someone to call them...

And pls dont trust the police on this...even rathore couldn't get anything out of them

And most imp this is a show and story progresses as per "desired" story track...