What Irony. - Page 4

Originally posted by: hermoinee

The fact that she did not feel she should take revenge for that act shows that she did not consider it as rape... She did not seem to have any compunctions also after that like she had been unfaithful to Veer, etc.. Also she continued her gambling sessions with him after that because of the lure of money... She was so proud of getting so much money and was talking as though she had earned that in business and what Jogi's expectations were in this regard... This shows that she has no guilt feelings or remorse about any of her misdeeds till date, which is not actually surprising....

Originally posted by: groucho

I must tell you that we might be celebrating too early..........the child has to be proved as Raghu's because Tapasya guided by Nani might fight it. A simple DNA will suffice............However, knowing the CV's I really doubt if they will give attention to such small details😆😆.

Originally posted by: hermoinee

The fact that she did not feel she should take revenge for that act shows that she did not consider it as rape... She did not seem to have any compunctions also after that like she had been unfaithful to Veer, etc.. Also she continued her gambling sessions with him after that because of the lure of money... She was so proud of getting so much money and was talking as though she had earned that in business and what Jogi's expectations were in this regard... This shows that she has no guilt feelings or remorse about any of her misdeeds till date, which is not actually surprising....

Originally posted by: dreamz12

Wat u have said is all true but I just hate the way the CVs had shown that Tapasya is the innocent party on that night just wants me to slap them. It really wud have been better had they shown that Taps in all her senses slept with Rathod. Why find an excuse for the affair or 1 nite stands ???

Where was Tapasya going with that bundle of money? Is she thinking of hiring some goons to take care of Raghu now?😆.

Originally posted by: spatty123

Where was Tapasya going with that bundle of money? Is she thinking of hiring some goons to take care of Raghu now?😆.

Another thing.. I know you are all going to call me a pessimist😉 but isnt it possible that nothing happened between them and it is just Raghu's plan to get back at her for being so arrogant and conceited. I thought of this because Tapasya till end denied all allegations..and whatever happened was shown as Raghu's flasback and not Tapasya's.

Originally posted by: cjs369

even though they needed to show that the baby was rathod's ... the CVs cudnt let their favourite taps be sullied totally so made it look like she was taken advantage of...
but what the Cvs dont realise that if their fav taps was really innocent in all this she wudnt have continued her association with rathod even after that night ... she wud have accused him and reported him to the police... or atleast wud never have continued playing with him the next day...

Originally posted by: dreamz12

@bold and nothing happened with Veer also becoz of his state that night...........................then how did this miracle (Taps preggy) happened???😆😆😆

Originally posted by: spatty123

Maybe you are right but it seems really odd that CVs would decide to show Tapasya as abla nari (as you mentioned earlier) and at the same time prove that the child is not Veer's unless they want to keep their options open and later on show that nothing happened and kid is still Veer's.

I hope I am making some sense.