not veer's child

i was wondering if it is possible that the child is not Veer' s but of the person (forgot his name) with him tapu partnered for gambling....

Hi, it seems everyone is predicting that it's veer's child as channel is also showing it. But actually it would be of Rathore. Tappu baby is 3 mnths preggy. She showed first sign while in Basti in August. Now it's Mid Jan'11 . So, almost 3 months. That time she had already left Rathore. So, in coming weeks it will be revealed soon that the baby doesn't belong to veer.

Originally posted by: smeenakshi76

Hi, it seems everyone is predicting that it's veer's child as channel is also showing it. But actually it would be of Rathore. Tappu baby is 3 mnths preggy. She showed first sign while in Basti in August. Now it's Mid Jan'11 . So, almost 3 months. That time she had already left Rathore. So, in coming weeks it will be revealed soon that the baby doesn't belong to veer.

totally agree with this point

Originally posted by: smeenakshi76

Hi, it seems everyone is predicting that it's veer's child as channel is also showing it. But actually it would be of Rathore. Tappu baby is 3 mnths preggy. She showed first sign while in Basti in August. Now it's Mid Jan'11 . So, almost 3 months. That time she had already left Rathore. So, in coming weeks it will be revealed soon that the baby doesn't belong to veer.

Hi! I'm new to this forum, although I've been following up all the comments. Well, I don't know why the Veecha fans (I'm one too) are worried. Obviously the child is not veers's. The episode when Veer was raped was shown sometime in July, so Taps couldn't have been 3 months preggy only!