Kanak: Victim or Culprit?

I think there should be third option

As Kanak said everyone can't be good for everyone

Originally posted by: Indira.

Uma deserves punishment, but what about Kanak?

Kanak is of both...
first she is victim and after culprit :-)

She's victim before she know Uma keep KMB's paper

to be frank..i dont care if kanak did wrong in lying..because i dont feel that much sympathy for.uma after marrying her forcefully..so what she lied abt getting back to house..she thought he is the villain who stole.babhoos shop..and becz of that bhabhoos life was in danger..so if see through kanaks pov..i would say she gave a tit for tat..still nothing compared yo what sge experienced by forced marriage..just running away frm umas house that day wouldnt have mended her.life forever..so what he did to her in his ignornace was way beyond anything she did back..i dnt thunk kanak is innocent..she is the kind of girl who does what it takes to attain justice..going back to umas house was her way of justice for uma taking shop by fraud...this is my pov..

Kanak is trying to get back her family legally owned property that US and/or his family obtained by fraud. There is no comparative btwn what Kanak has done n US' crime. Kanak has legit claim to the shop. US has no authority to kidnap n marry any girl against her Will. Lying vs criminal acts.

A thief is one who steals not one who asks for papers and gets it handed to her.

Her crime is manipulation and that too not on a vulnerable elderly person that can be manipulated, but a young man who's capable of doing things for himself and is very aware.

Unfortunately the law does not arrest for manipulation especially if the person gave away their possession by choice. He wasnt threatened nor forced...Kanak asked, he said okay.

Legally theres no crime at all...it's a losing case and that arrest wouldn't stick whatsoever.

What you think of Kanak for this manipulation and deception, thats a different matter and upto you. If you think its a crime then its fair to do so. It's not a clear matter.

I think it was unnecessary to plot and plan and she should have talked to US but also I can understand...living with a man for 2 days doesnt mwan you know him or trust him or have a good opinion. Kanak wasn't acting rationally cos the forced marriage really put him in bad light and why should she trust a man who forced her, to be fair about property papers.

Kanak is human, neither all nor all bad. Even Uma is not all bad but his regressive ideals and beliefs does overshadow the goodness in his heart.

Also forced marriage can not be equated to manipulation and deception...one is more horrifying (forcefully picked up biting and scratching and crying) while the other was just giving away one propery and that too with consent.

Consent makes all the difference...No is no, no matter what.

Uma had a choice, Kanak did not.

Originally posted by: AnjanaYYZ

Kanak is trying to get back her family legally owned property that US and/or his family obtained by fraud. There is no comparative btwn what Kanak has done n US' crime. Kanak has legit claim to the shop. US has no authority to kidnap n marry any girl against her Will. Lying vs criminal acts.

Most importantly Kanak never committed any fraud to get it back neither did she commit a crime from a legal stand.

She genuinely cant be arrested.

Originally posted by: Ahlaam5

A thief is one who steals not one who asks for papers and gets it handed to her.

Her crime is manipulation and that too not on a vulnerable elderly person that can be manipulated, but a young man who's capable of doing things for himself and is very aware.

Unfortunately the law does not arrest for manipulation especially if the person gave away their possession by choice. He wasnt threatened nor forced...Kanak asked, he said okay.

Legally theres no crime at all...it's a losing case and that arrest wouldn't stick whatsoever.

What you think of Kanak for this manipulation and deception, thats a different matter and upto you. If you think its a crime then its fair to do so. It's not a clear matter.

I think it was unnecessary to plot and plan and she should have talked to US but also I can understand...living with a man for 2 days doesnt mwan you know him or trust him or have a good opinion. Kanak wasn't acting rationally cos the forced marriage really put him in bad light and why should she trust a man who forced her, to be fair about property papers.

Kanak is human, neither all nor all bad. Even Uma is not all bad but his regressive ideals and beliefs does overshadow the goodness in his heart.

Also forced marriage can not be equated to manipulation and deception...one is more horrifying (forcefully picked up biting and scratching and crying) while the other was just giving away one propery and that too with consent.

Consent makes all the difference...No is no, no matter what.

Uma had a choice, Kanak did not.