[Quote=Sound] She's not feeling for her husband. I think what she's trying to ask is was killing the husband only option available?? Could she not have resorted to some other help (plenty is available in Western Countries for dealing with abuse)
i think that was the only option therefore she did it otherwise y would she risk imprisonment in some other country? y would a timid woman like her go to such an extent as to kill her husband?
as far as west is concerned i dont knw abt their laws and how many laws apply if u r married under hindu marriage act.and if there r so many laws then y do we hear so many murder cases of NRi wifes?
Why did the woman not take an action sooner and if she was bold enough to buy petrol to set her husband on fire in the dead of the night, why didn't she simply seek help from authorities? As you said, she might not have been independednt enough, then her parents were at fault somewhere not to have taught her to fight for herself and to be independent enough to deal with the abuse hurled at her for 10 long years.
[/QUOTE]
either she had no other option but to kill him to gain her independence or she did what she did without planning just in the spur of a moment. in both cases i think she is innocent.i think she either did not have courage to revolt or she did not find anywhere to turn to or didnt knw where to go.
her story reminds me of agnisakshi her husband seems similiar to nana patekar.in that he did not allow her to communicate with anyone not even her father so that she can tell her problem to him.
but one thing is clear that she did not have anyother option but to kill her husband otherwise she would not have done it as she seemed to be such a timid woman.
Edited by sandya_rao7 - 17 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount