Palak is dating this guy or Saif’s Son ?
Palak is dating this guy or Saif’s Son ?
This palak girl is everywhere
She looks so bad I don’t know how people find her pretty
She comes across as a wannabe
Originally posted by: Clochette
Oh nooooooo!!!! (but what a strange article-title ...oups!)
"Not Ibrahim Ali Khan but Palak Tiwari is dating ‘The Archies’ actor Vedang Raina"
Aaaahhhhh...he looks so sexxxyyyyy *sigh*
Super rich dude went to the same school as nepo-queens Alia and Shraddha did. Dated actress' daughter and somehow (allegedly) is related to Kailash Kher.
This is why nepotism debate goes nowhere. It's a mudda that has spilled over into popular culture while the og anti-nepo lords and intellectuals have their sons at the helm of biggest corporates with zero talent.
Nepo kids are talentless (Shabana, Ratna, Smita, Konkona, Sharmila, Rani, Tabu say hi) but here's a marginally better actor from the same social circle, see how nepotism is deatroyed!
Now Bollywood is totally accessible to Raju Kamble who does better acting in his college's nukkad nataks than all of these people put together! Talent and merit won!
If people could accept that it requires caste, class, and ~ other~ privileges for even talented people to make it in Bollywood, I would respect the *discourse* more. Sure nepo-babies have easy, undue access, it is absolutely unfair, but outsiders who make it and are celebrated are privileged in their own social standing too. Lol Rajesh Khanna was an outsider who 'struggled' in sports cars and yet got movies through a talent hunt. The lack of nuance or self-reflection in anti-nepotism debate is such a self-parody, it is hilarious.
Suhana is a bad actress. She has gotten body-shamed for her colour and features by people a decade older than her as much as if not more so her acting. People on here call her every name based on her looks. What is to say that she would havd been welcomed by the anti-nepo janta let alone casting directors any more if she were an underprivileged, super-talented actor? How many romantic roles does Konkona get despite being Aparna-freaking-Sen's daughter? Bhagyashree's son? How romantic many roles has Rajkumar got as opposed to Ayushmann? Niharika and Yashica are gaslit lol.
You don't want to equalise the playing field for everyone, it's just an effing mudda that your middle class sensibilities likes and can tolerate.
On the other hand, we have weirdoes like Amitabh, Saif, Karan, and Zoya who would rather die on defending-nepotism-hill rather than accepting that their kids have better access than others irrespective of acting talent (which some of them do have lol).
On what planet did this happen? Your fantasies don't count.
Originally posted by: Blueeeee
Super rich dude went to the same school as nepo-queens Alia and Shraddha did. Dated actress' daughter and somehow (allegedly) is related to Kailash Kher.
This is why nepotism debate goes nowhere. It's a mudda that has spilled over into popular culture while the og anti-nepo lords and intellectuals have their sons at the helm of biggest corporates with zero talent.
Nepo kids are talentless (Shabana, Ratna, Smita, Konkona, Sharmila, Rani, Tabu say hi) but here's a marginally better actor from the same social circle, see how nepotism is deatroyed!
Now Bollywood is totally accessible to Raju Kamble who does better acting in his college's nukkad nataks than all of these people put together! Talent and merit won!
If people could accept that it requires caste, class, and ~ other~ privileges for even talented people to make it in Bollywood, I would respect the *discourse* more. Sure nepo-babies have easy, undue access, it is absolutely unfair, but outsiders who make it and are celebrated are privileged in their own social standing too. Lol Rajesh Khanna was an outsider who 'struggled' in sports cars and yet got movies through a talent hunt. The lack of nuance or self-reflection in anti-nepotism debate is such a self-parody, it is hilarious.
Suhana is a bad actress. She has gotten body-shamed for her colour and features by people a decade older than her as much as if not more so her acting. People on here call her every name based on her looks. What is to say that she would havd been welcomed by the anti-nepo janta let alone casting directors any more if she were an underprivileged, super-talented actor? How many romantic roles does Konkona get despite being Aparna-freaking-Sen's daughter? Bhagyashree's son? How romantic many roles has Rajkumar got as opposed to Ayushmann? Niharika and Yashica are gaslit lol.
You don't want to equalise the playing field for everyone, it's just an effing mudda that your middle class sensibilities likes and can tolerate.
On the other hand, we have weirdoes like Amitabh, Saif, Karan, and Zoya who would rather die on defending-nepotism-hill rather than accepting that their kids have better access than others irrespective of acting talent (which some of them do have lol).
Shabana, ratna, Smita all went to National school of drama did not come just like that
Rani too was bad in first 3 movies than she took acting coaching (she only said in interview that her mom told producers do not waste money on my daughter after seeing initial movies)
Sharmila started with satya jit rai who taught her acting
Tabuu had an actress sister and was bad in initial movies from 1986
rajesh khanna was a good actor and got good roles amra prem, aradhna, hathi m,mere saathim, namak haram where he did better than The Amitabh Bachchan etc he was no suhana khan
how kids were brought up in 60s(rajesh khanna, sharmila) 70s(shabana, smita patil, ratna) and 90s kids (konkana, tabu, rani) was very different ok. Their parents would not molly coodle them or pamper them and expected them to be serious about work
Anyone who can read… and has read the reviews and seen the public response knows what the truth isOriginally posted by: hotchoco
On what planet did this happen? Your fantasies don't count.
Originally posted by: Shaitan-Haiwan
Anyone who can read… and has read the reviews and seen the public response knows what the truth is
The reviews were almost all positive for Suhana including the international ones. Online bots crying tears of rage and jealousy don't count.
Meanwhile, enjoy this and cry some more.
Originally posted by: hotchoco
On what planet did this happen? Your fantasies don't count.
They count on this forum......don't you see the back patting and chest thumping going on everywhere....
Originally posted by: hotchoco
The reviews were almost all positive for Suhana including the international ones. Online bots crying tears of rage and jealousy don't count.
Meanwhile, enjoy this and cry some more.
But but but......all the positive reviews are SRK's PR and all the negative ones are a 100% genuine......so we are disregarding the positive reviews....humari marzi....
Originally posted by: myviewprem
Rani too was bad in first 3 movies than she took acting coaching (she only said in interview that her mom told producers do not waste money on my daughter after seeing initial movies)
Rani's debut in Raja Ki Aayegi Baaraat was good enough that Karan saw it and cast her in KKHH based on that.
comment:
p_commentcount