is kangana ranaut fake superstar - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

58

Views

4462

Users

25

Likes

91

Frequent Posters

harun98 thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: Softness

She was a superstar at the time of Tanu Weds Manu Returns and Queen from 2013 to 2015. 


I  think superstar is far fetched, yes a star but not a superstar in same sense as Katrina, kareena lol. and 150 crore wasn't a big deal in 2015. She doesn't have a movie in the top 3 grossers of the year. I heard some of her fan's started comparing her to sridevi madhuri lol. Sridevi had Nagina which was the second highest grossing film of the year in female centred role, second to her movie karma which was multistarrthen she had Tohfa which was female orientated role with Jaya Prada. She can't even compare herself to Bipasha basu as a star which bipasha delivered Raaz second highest grosser of 2002 😂


As someone said she's self-proclaimed super, media star, controversies keeps are in the limelight. 

harun98 thumbnail
Anniversary 11 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: SaayaOfKaaya

So who's the genuine female superstar then? As unfortunate as it is, India hasn't produced a legit female superstar since Madhuri.

Kangana has a 150+ crore blockbuster and starred in what is arguably the best Hindi movie of last decade in Queen.

She mayn't have the pull of the Khans. But she's someone who's genuinely been successful over the past decade.

No female actor in Bollywood has box-office appeal. I find that unfortunate. But Kangana has delivered successful movies or great movies despite not being one of Bollywood's "chosen ones."

That should be commended.


Vidya Balan has been doing that but top 3 movies???? not even single movie in top 3.

PardesiBabu thumbnail
Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail Anniversary 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#13

Originally posted by: SaayaOfKaaya

So who's the genuine female superstar then? As unfortunate as it is, India hasn't produced a legit female superstar since Madhuri.

Kangana has a 150+ crore blockbuster and starred in what is arguably the best Hindi movie of last decade in Queen.

She mayn't have the pull of the Khans. But she's someone who's genuinely been successful over the past decade.

No female actor in Bollywood has box-office appeal. I find that unfortunate. But Kangana has delivered successful movies or great movies despite not being one of Bollywood's "chosen ones."

That should be commended.

Queen opened at 1 cr and earned 60 crs lifetime and it is nowhere the best film of last decade 

Uri earned 250+ crs, nobody calls yami or vickey a superstar 😆  

She is definitely a chosen one of the govt but not for her work onscreen. Her films are disasters since 2015 but her budget is shooting up. Where is the money coming from? 

Edited by PardesiBabu - 2 years ago
CriticusExpert thumbnail
Anniversary 6 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 0 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: PardesiBabu

Queen opened at 1 cr and earned 60 crs lifetime and it is nowhere the best film of last decade 

Uri earned 250+ crs, nobody calls yami or vickey a superstar 😆  

She is definitely a chosen one of the govt but not for her work onscreen. Her films are disasters since 2015 but her budget is shooting up. Where is the money coming from? 

Golden.


I predict we will get no quick answers to that very logical question.

PangaNaLe thumbnail
Own Your Stories Participant 0 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 2 years ago
#15

She's not a Superstar but then no actress is. It's actually unfortunate.

PardesiBabu thumbnail
Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail Anniversary 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: AwaamKiJaan

She's not a Superstar but then no actress is. It's actually unfortunate.


Madhuri and Sridevi were last Superstars. 


After that, Aishwarya, Kajol, Katrina, Deepika are to some extent loved by masses

Edited by PardesiBabu - 2 years ago
PangaNaLe thumbnail
Own Your Stories Participant 0 Thumbnail Group Promotion 5 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 2 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: PardesiBabu


Madhuri and Sridevi were last Superstars. 


After that, Aishwarya, Kajol, Katrina, Deepika are to some extent loved by masses

I wrote "Is". Present tense. 

Kajol was a Superstar. Aishwarya, Deepika, Katrina nope! 

Sea-stars thumbnail
Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 0 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 2 years ago
#18

She was never a super star. She  has a few hits to her credit. The  audience liked  her work and some of her movies very much. She is not a good dancer but good at acting. She is not that beautiful but overall looks fine.

Shaitan-Haiwan thumbnail
Anniversary 12 Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 0 Thumbnail + 6

Critique Crusaders

Posted: 2 years ago
#19

I honestly think she could’ve been legendary and iconic if she had just kept her mouth closed after TWMR


In her case her bad attitude is the reason why she’s not a real superstar. Otherwise she does have it all “on screen” 

Edited by Shaitan-Haiwan - 2 years ago
Autumn_Rose thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 2 years ago
#20

Originally posted by: PardesiBabu


Madhuri and Sridevi were last Superstars. 


After that, Aishwarya, Kajol, Katrina, Deepika are to some extent loved by masses


No, actually.. vyjanyhimala was the first and only female superstar in Hindi Cinema.



Sridevi and Madhuri were big stars but not like Vyjanyhimala.