Do you think Hrithik and Kangana had an affair?

It was all Kangu the Nangu’s nanga naach.🤢

Originally posted by: Softness

ya, illicit

I don't think so. Kangana could not prove it, and knowing the kind of person she is, if she actually had proof, she would have flaunted it all over the internet.

No. It was her imagination. 

no Kangana is delusional

Originally posted by: Billi_Bangalan

Why don't you come up with something nice and innovative or is that beyond your abilities😉

No.

Nor do I think Hrithik and KKK had an affair 😆.

Not sure. Maybe a fling but not a long-term affair like she claimed (e.g. saying that he proposed to her, etc).

One more time (I hope)

Her own stalking e-mails say it never happened.  She wrote she could barely speak to him in person, she wondered why he didn't know he was in love with her,  never kissed, never dated, he never saw her naked (so here's some unasked for nude pics) etc etc.

Textbook Erotomania aka “de Clérambault’s Syndrome”

https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-020-02921-5

The main characteristic of de Clérambault’s Syndrome is that the patient (subject), usually a woman, believes she is loved by a man (object). The object must have been the first to fall in love and to make the first advances, the object is more in love than the subject, or the subject may not even return the feelings – it is all about being loved, not loving [1, 2]. De Clérambault also described other components of the syndrome, which he considered to be derived from the main belief [2].

The subject has had very little previous contact with the object of love, which is superior and unattainable in some way, either because he his highly intelligent, incredibly beautiful, famous, belongs to a higher social status, or is married, for example [1, 2]. In some instances, the subject may reject the object of love, however, in most of the cases, he returns the feelings [1]. The subject is convinced that the object cannot be truly happy or complete without her, and if the object is married, the subject believes it is not a valid marriage [1, 2]. The subject believes she watches over the object, that she has indirect conversations with him, and may become bothersome in the object’s life [1, 2].

Despite repeated rejection from the object, the subject keeps believing that the object protects her and that he has difficulties approaching her and cannot return her love for several unexplained reasons. She rationalizes the object’s behavior and interprets his dismissals in a way that confirms that he is in fact madly in love with her. This paradoxical behavior of the object is an essential component of the syndrome that must always be present [1, 2].

De Clérambault described the following stages of evolution of Erotomania: hope, resentment and grudge [1, 2]. The last phase is considered to be the most important. After hoping that the object openly declares his love and by insistently pursuing him, the subject starts feeling humiliated. She may start to hate the object, to become abusive and to claim that the object wronged her, and her delusion of love may even turn into a persecutory delusion [1, 2].

One night stand or a fling may be. But not a full fledged affair.