'You chose public life': Bombay HC tells Shilpa Shetty - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

25

Views

3673

Users

18

Likes

67

Frequent Posters

YourCat thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: MujheMaarjaneDo

Silpa wanted to stop anyone from reporting the case, big difference between her case and Salman's case😆


nope what Shilpa wanted to stop was this 


In her plea, Shilpa Shetty had objected to certain media channels carrying news reports about her breaking down when Mumbai Police officials took Raj Kundra to their residence for searches last week.


Appearing for Shilpa Shetty, advocate Biren Saraf objected to such reports, arguing that it was "something that happened between a husband and wife, and should not have been reported".

Ur-Miserable thumbnail
Anniversary 8 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 2 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: Lalakhun1


nope what Shilpa wanted to stop was this 


In her plea, Shilpa Shetty had objected to certain media channels carrying news reports about her breaking down when Mumbai Police officials took Raj Kundra to their residence for searches last week.


Appearing for Shilpa Shetty, advocate Biren Saraf objected to such reports, arguing that it was "something that happened between a husband and wife, and should not have been reported".


No she wanted a blanket gag on her name appearing in any of the reports.

This was just an incident which she put forward to justify her request.

YourCat thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#13

Police force who leaked the conversation between her and her husband are stupid because they have proved that shilpa had no idea what her husband was doing 


During the police search on Friday, Shilpa Shetty reportedly wept and asked Kundra, “We have everything, what was the need to do all this?” According to reports, police sources said that Shilpa broke down and said that their ‘reputation was ruined, their endorsements in the industry were being cancelled’. 


Shilpa on the other hand send a defamation case saying she have not said any such thing which means she knew what her husband was doing. 😆


So either the police are lying or shilpa was acting in front of the police 

maha15 thumbnail
Anniversary 7 Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 0 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 2 years ago
#14

These BW people think --they r very special people 😆 drama company people chalo hawa mei se Jameen pe utro---aur khursi ke pethi baand lo😆

return_to_hades thumbnail
Anniversary 18 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 2 years ago
#15

The High Court is being absurd here. Firstly, no one chooses a public life. Some professions and situations propel you into the public eye. Secondly, even if someone chooses public life, the law is supposed to be equal to all citizens. Everyone is protected equally by defamation, slander, and libel laws and has the right to sue anyone who spreads false information. They have to prove the information is false. Everyone has the right to privacy. Certain elements of private life cannot be made public just because someone is famous. 

CoffeeCake thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 2 years ago
#16

I don't believe that she wasn't aware about her husband's main business, she isn't some idiot who wouldn't know that from where such expensive gifts and lavish life style is coming. If she was really unaware about that, she should file a divorce case, not explain the difference between p*rn and erotica.


 Having said that, she is right to demand 'stop media trials'. Just last year we had this media drama in Sushant's  case where Arnab was a judge, Kangnu was an eye witness with damaged eyes, Navika as lawyer  AND at last nobody was proven anything, but media trials have done enough damage for few people. She should be given benefit of doubt till proven guilty by police. Public figure doesn't mean public's property. Court should have given some guidelines to report the case.

Ktptalks thumbnail
Anniversary 3 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail Commentator 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: Mahisa_22


Which YouTuber was that?


It was a video called raj kundra and links to SSR...that video was stating that raj kundra was involved in drugs as well...i dislike the video and reported it... hopefully the person had taken down or something....these type of videos are rubbish

Manavi_kesari thumbnail
IPL 2023 Participants 3 Thumbnail Anniversary 12 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 2 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: Lalakhun1

And salman choose private life, that's why notice will be sent to krk


Well said . 



Nice like Shilpa Shetty , Salman n other criminals of bolly also must lose offers n get punished .


Bazigar thumbnail
Anniversary 10 Thumbnail Group Promotion 4 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#19

its naïve to think she was not aware of content of many app which itself on litigation long ago with FIR , now pretending as if dont knew.  my only issue these craps mint crores of money but paid actress actors few thousands like 5000. Not even enough for them stay in a jhopad pati for few days in mumbai. Good these celebrities get exposed. Confrontation of SS vs RK must not leaked by police but their own PR to shred any liability  . crap people

Edited by Bazigar - 2 years ago
Stella_001 thumbnail
Anniversary 3 Thumbnail Group Promotion 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#20

Can’t sympathise with someone who knowingly stayed silent about her husband exploiting others for p*rn and erotica content and now is playing the victim card