Watched the episode, whitewashing of "Bechara Vanraj" and so-called "villainess women Kavya" whose character is being butchered by CVs.
Do CVs really think the audience would be entertained only if women were to be villains? First Rakhi and now it's Kavya.
Kavya was shown as a logical and smart woman, who supported Anu's little steps towards being a strong woman. Her insecurities at one point were justified too. But now, I can't relate her actions and logic at all. Kavya just wants Vanraj only- what good it would do to her if she were to just throw out baa and Bapuji? All kids would be still in the picture. I am surprised, CVs didn't learn enough from the accident track?
Now coming to the actual villain - Vanraj Shah. Bapuji portrayed Baap and Pati as an entity in society who doesn't get recognization for their contribution. Yes in the real world that might be true. BUT he said that referring to Vanraj. From what I recall - most of the episodes till EMA revealed were catered to boost the superiority of Vanraj. He was never 'Bechara' who was left on the sidelines.
According to Anu and Bapuji, he suffered a lot. Yes! whatever little he suffered, he suffered for his own selfish choices. On top of that, he made sure the whole family suffers too! On what basis actually they are trying to gather sympathy?
I liked, how Anu was pushing everyone collectively to move on. That was a good move. I also appreciate that she wants to end the relationship on peaceful terms but friendship? I am not sure how Mahan the act is, to be friends with someone who abused you mentally and physically in the recent past. I would rather have them behave on just Humane ground. But again, if they didn't behave all friendly- how would Kavya get even more illogical and negative🤪
comment:
p_commentcount