|Total Votes :||69|
Tapsee is a mediocre actress, nothing great. Kangala is better, any day. But, I’ll watch either of them only if the movie is good. If the movie is bad, cannot watch it even if it has great acting.
But, I choose to watch Kangana’s offscreen interviews . They are so entertaining than any of her movies.
Kangana as an actress is good. As a director is bad. As she start taking over the films once she starts acting in, it is difficult to watch her movie.
But I liked her in Queen. Panga trailer looked great. I have not watched the movie.
But I can't follow her dialogue delivery.
Even Tapsee sucks in dialogue delivery. It is very bland. (In Rhea's interview, I was remembering Tapsee's voice with no variation).
But expressionwise, I like Kangana (specially when she has to portray vulnerability). Main problem to accept her is her offscreen personality. IF she is away from media, IF she does not interfere with directors, I would prefer Kangana's movie. But how can that happen?Edited by flipfl0p - 7 months ago
Both. They are talented. I would rather not watch ananya, janhvi, sara, deepika, sonam etc who try too hard and can’t act properly. Why would i choose between kangana and taapsee who are hardworking and good actors.
Topic started by mintyblue
Last replied by josh135