Originally posted by: stormborn
Thanks 
Apart from the humour, I called him black hole because in a broad sense, black holes are where immense mass is congested in a very less volume. This very high density gives the black hole extremely intense gravitational energy.
Similarly Krishna is a human incarnation of the almighty. An ultimate supreme being, the sustainer of the whole universe, residing inside a small human structure. His attraction is so immense that no1 can escape him. At the end, we all are his Gopikas and he is the one and only masculine form. This is why Meerabai said, there are no purush Vaishnav. The only Purush is Krishna himself. This is why even Mahadeva took the gopeswara form.
The black color is formed when all colors of light are absorbed into it. Such is our Krishna. Once you become his devotee, you become his beloved forever. There's no escape. And after you die, it's his baikunth where your soul finds its last solace.
Similarly, in a much much broader sense, the Higgs field is assumed to be responsible for the creation of the universe. The Higgs boson particle is mass converted from energy. ( From your earlier comment it seemed like you compared Krishna with energy and Radha with mass) . Though i compared Radha with the informal term god-particle on a whim because it had the word 'god' and Krishna with black hole because of the word 'black', few of these theories crossed my mind very quickly.
Now that I know you compared them to dark matter and dark energy, I am intrigued. Dying to know your explanation for such comparison. Really enjoying this conversation with you.
comment:
p_commentcount