What are arranged marriages then? There's usually only a commitment before it turns into love in some cases.
Originally posted by: FruitToasty
Rules terrify me, I believe they take away the basic freedom from us, and who decides rules or norms for relationship of an individual? I guess that person has the right to do it.I am just saying that it is possible to stop loving someone you once loved with all your heart.Personally, I believe if we can't be content with someone, we should not commit anything
Originally posted by: FruitToasty
But people can be cordial with each other, don't fight but feel that they don't love each other and part ways mutually, right?
Originally posted by: FruitToasty
I am talking about romantic relationships, which is the case with this show.None had an arranged marriage, everyone is in love marriage and romantically involved with their partner
Originally posted by: krystal_watz
But the discontentment comes AFTER committing, then? We can't just walk off.It's not really about any 'rules'. You have to make adjustments if you want to be truly happy. That's a fact.
Talking about season 2, who is having a love marriage? MishVeer relationship seems a practical decision than love. And yes people can be in a romantic relationship without being in love.
Originally posted by: FruitToasty
Mishti got into this marriage because she told everyone around her that she lives Veer, there have been many scenes where Mishti has proclaimed love for Veer.Practical decision where Veer believes that Mishti is in love with him? So we come down to Mishti, didn't know that what she feels for Veer is love, right?I don't understand this concept and that's the point of my post. In Kunal and Mauli's relationship, they said that Kunal mistook friendship for Mauli as love, he didn't know anything about love before Nandini.Same goes for Ishaan and Mauli, they said that Mauli didn't know true love before Ishaan, now Mishti didn't know love before Ruhaan.They can show that Mishti and Veer fell out of love but they are showing that Mishti didn't know anything about loveBecause there is a chance that someone hotter or better than Ruhaan might come along and Mishti will have entirely different feelings for him and she can say that "I have never felt this before, I did not know love feels like this"So again Mishti didn't know that what she felt for Ruhaan was love...
I think in season 1 Mauli loved Kunal very deeply and intensely...but eventually after all the pain, hurt and betrayal he gave her...that love died ..and it was only years later that she fell in love with Ishaan. But Mauli definitely loved Kunal immensely ...and she took years to get over him. With regards to Kunal ..I'm not sure whether he loved Mauli or nandu...his feelings were not explained properly . Because in the end he did want to get back with Mauli..so we don't really know if he never loved mauli or if he fell out of love with her slowly over time and then when he met nandu he fell for her.. I'm still confused about Kunal. As for mishty ,.i think it's clearer ...she had the misconception that if she meets the perfect man , he will fulfill his commitment to her and she will be happy. So when she met perfect veer .she liked his good qualities and she mistook that liking for love ..so in Mishtys case I think she never loved veer ...yes she told him she loved him..because she believed that was love ...but it actually wasn't but now she's falling in actual love with ruhaan ...that's why she's questioning whether she does love veer...I think the writers are going this route with. Mishty,,because the promo ..today indicates that she has never had feelings like she has for ruhaan for veer..Originally posted by: FruitToasty
Happy Easter ❤️
The concept of Silsila is all about people being in committed relationship, only to end it.This ending of a relationship or change in partners can be explained with the concept of people falling out of love, but somehow I have noticed that makers go for "Never in love" instead of "Yes, we did love each other, but not anymore"Is this really important for leads to love only ONE person in their life? In this age and time, we may not expect physical virginity but the heart has to be a virgin ie none else was there before our male lead or female lead.In Season 1 makers went with Kunal never loved Mauli, it was just friendship that he mistook for love, he fell in love for the first time with Nandini, before Nandini he didn't know meaning of loveMauli fell in love with Ishaan before Ishaan, she didn't know meaning of true loveIn Season 2, Mishti is in relationship with Veer, she can fall out of love, there are so many compatibility issues. It doesn't even have to be her daddy issues, Veer is dominant by nature and Mishti doesn't have to compromise on her life, or Veer should have known dominant nature of Mishti, then down the line, he feels that he can't compromise on his needs, ultimately they get to decide but NO, Mishti is female lead, how can she fall for someone else before our Male lead?So the question is that, is falling out of the love so unacceptable when.it is the most natural thing? Since childhood to adulthood, we change so much, we like something today and hate it tomorrow.Isn't this very basic?So why are makers afraid of exploring changes in relationship as falling out of love instead of saying that they were never in love, it was all a facade?How is someone being in a fake relationship and leading on an innocent love sick puppy better than someone being in an honest relationship but falling out of love due to difference of opinion or compatibility issues?
Originally posted by: FruitToasty
Happy Easter ❤️
The concept of Silsila is all about people being in committed relationship, only to end it.This ending of a relationship or change in partners can be explained with the concept of people falling out of love, but somehow I have noticed that makers go for "Never in love" instead of "Yes, we did love each other, but not anymore"Is this really important for leads to love only ONE person in their life? In this age and time, we may not expect physical virginity but the heart has to be a virgin ie none else was there before our male lead or female lead.In Season 1 makers went with Kunal never loved Mauli, it was just friendship that he mistook for love, he fell in love for the first time with Nandini, before Nandini he didn't know meaning of loveMauli fell in love with Ishaan before Ishaan, she didn't know meaning of true loveIn Season 2, Mishti is in relationship with Veer, she can fall out of love, there are so many compatibility issues. It doesn't even have to be her daddy issues, Veer is dominant by nature and Mishti doesn't have to compromise on her life, or Veer should have known dominant nature of Mishti, then down the line, he feels that he can't compromise on his needs, ultimately they get to decide but NO, Mishti is female lead, how can she fall for someone else before our Male lead?So the question is that, is falling out of the love so unacceptable when.it is the most natural thing? Since childhood to adulthood, we change so much, we like something today and hate it tomorrow.Isn't this very basic?So why are makers afraid of exploring changes in relationship as falling out of love instead of saying that they were never in love, it was all a facade?How is someone being in a fake relationship and leading on an innocent love sick puppy better than someone being in an honest relationship but falling out of love due to difference of opinion or compatibility issues?
comment:
p_commentcount