But that's exactly my point. Justifying Kunal and Nandani's affair with terrible writing is actually a very poor justification of the couple. If there was conversations between Nandani and Kunal or there was inner turmoil that was shown in these two characters of them feeling things for each other, then that would have been better. My whole point is that writing Nandani as someone who would steal her best friends husband is unrealistic. And then they go and show Mauli dealing with her trauma in the most realistic sense ever is being super unfair to Drashti because we all know given the chance DD would have been able to give a fantastic performance as someone who is processing through her trauma.Originally posted by: aishwarya12joys
No they actually tried everything to justify kunal and Nandini's affair and tried to fully cash upon dd and shakti's stardom. As aditi was not well established in TV they did not expect any fan following for her. Everything back fired, the audience could not tolerate the justification and started bashing, out of nowhere huge part of all fandoms started supporting mauli's character and aditi's acting made people feel mauli. The characterization of mauli plus aditi playing it so effortlessly made audience demand a story for her. Makers never excepted this , they realized they have written mauli so realistically people are connecting with her and feeling her even though she has less screen space. Having no other options they had to give mauli this.
Drashti is one amazing actress but I have seen actress better than her. I have seen all her previous shows.If they wanted to favor mauli, they could have not brought divine signs to justify kunal and Nandini. They literally did not have idea about whole thing.
comment:
p_commentcount