Originally posted by: Padfoot_Prongs
U read Nirmala. It made me cry buckets so much. I was not much mature at that time so it left me a deep impression. The worse was I kept thinking about the end when the child and her old aunt were left alone. I kept thinking how will they survive.
Nirmala's whole life was so sad, just because of one incident. If the dowry money was not looted she wud have been married to completely different person and a happy life. I also cried for the eldest son. I wish he was the one who wud have been married to nirmala. The accusations and pain he had to go through was heartbreaking. I hated Nirmala's husband for what he put his eldest son through.
I was left crying at many scenes as well. The story was such that every stage of it left an impression. I found it surprising that the author had such forward thinking. For a story that was written in the early 20th century, it says a lot when I can still connect to the story with such ease.
The eldest son was the purest character in the whole story, in my opinion. While in words we only saw how his father was affected by his death, I noticed more how subtly the author showed us the way Nirmala was affected by it.
And at the end I kept wondering when did the story turn so...was it when her husband grew suspicious, or when Nirmala was rejected, or her father killed, wouldn't it have been different if she had at least some support from the sister in law? As I said, every turn of the story gives us a reflection of our society and teaches us something.
I'm glad I read it now. If I were younger, I wouldn't have appreciated the work as much as I do now.
comment:
p_commentcount