Originally posted by: jibber-jabber
Boycott was there only when the people at the receiving end were those who she didn't like. 🥱
So much for being firm and staying her ground. 🥱 And agar aab baat ki hai toh thank you bhi toh bolna tha na when he had nominated himself so that she could creep out Gauhar.
This is basically the bottom line. For those saying 'stand le toh problem, na le toh problem' - nope, I have no problem with her speaking up yesterday - it's what people should be doing, i.e. giving a damn.
But are people really supposed to not question this, when she spent the last week repeating, through actions and words, and being applauded for staying away from negativity, for not entertaining the likes of Jagga and Baba, and for only speaking when she's at the receiving end?
It was only a couple days ago that she established that she's all about herself - no matter the filth being spewed about, as long as said filth isn't directed at her. And that her boycott of Baba is pakka wala - doesn't talk to him at all. Toh phir - what changed yesterday? It was Rohan at the receiving end - not Lopa or Manu - that's what changed. If she's all that 'real' - why not call a spade a spade, and accept that?
And the boycott was never pakka wala - if it was, why take a favour from someone you don't even deem worthy of speaking to? Nope, take the favour, and then boycott back in place when it's the time to say 'thank you'.
The same with Manu - her lack of empathy for him was defended because apparently she's not on good terms with him - because Jagga told her he made an obscene comment about Bani joining him on his bed in a few days, apparently. Has Bani verified this? And regardless, why take a favour from such a man then? But favour lena hai - lekin badle mein ek boond empathy nahin manage hogi.
Edited by SP2684 - 7 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount