Originally posted by: Missesha
@ bold - Yes. There is no fun in watching Anandi's half baked attempts of stopping child marriages, running an NGO type school without head or tail, searching for a long lost child by making lose attempts, pretending to leave her ex-husband's house by giving long lectures but come back at a drop of hat and become a lynch there and so much more
There is nothing that Anandi does right with a clear - cut thought process, execution and strategy. She only makes half-baked attempts about everything and then leaves it all hanging. Work wise she is all over the place and very poor manager of her work, habits and life.The reason sometimes I don't comment over lamely executed tracks is because there is no point in digging the same loose issues over and over again. If peoples' silence is assumed as non-appreciation of Anandi's work, than that is true. There is nothing good in the GOOD that Anandi pretends to do. So yes, unfortunately there is nothing left to appreciate Anandi anymore.---------------------Her character post leap is indeed non-value adding, otherwise makers won't be working on Nimboli (the next lead) to run the show. Even makers know that they have milked enough out of their character Anandi.Anandi is now like the "Dogs" of BCG Matrix. (i.e. Low Market Growth Rate and Low Market Share)Below is the quote from Boston Consulting Group Matrix, whose theory on 'Dogs' exactly explains the viabiity of Anandi's character (product of BV) in the showAll products eventually become either cash cows or pets [dogs]. Dogs are generally considered cash traps because businesses have money tied up in them, even though they are bringing back basically nothing in return. These business units are prime candidates for divestiture.
Originally posted by: Missesha
Wonder what are the basis of your statistics? Do you have any proven records from reliable sources, which can prove that Anandi is still admired and looked upon?. Or is that all just your assumption?
I have read various internet based posts outside of this forum for last 3 months on regular intervals only to see what people think of Anandi outside of IF. And all the posts have one essence only: Let the crap end. Let Anandi do something worthwhile.People do not seems to sympathise with Anandi anymore, because not a single post that I read has justified Anandi's actions or shown sympathy for her. (Even Managala's evilness doesn't seem to make people's heart melt for Anandi)Agressive justifications are only happening on this forum. And if those handful of justifications makes you think Anandi admirers are in majority, then I am afraid you are mistaken.On the contrary, the channel now feels the need for clubbing BV with other shows much frequently than ever before. Is it because they want to attract regular viewers of other shows to re-start watching BV?
It's funny when people don't get a justification on how two exes can live together, then they will straight away question " who is the audience to question the writer / show maker" . As if the show makers are eternity who can never can go wrong.Originally posted by: aparnauma
If the writer wants to tell a story of two people who were brought to gether in a child marriage ended up having a bad marriage which didn't survive but remained friends for life and will go to any extent to help each other who is any one to stop him?It is his story and the constitution of our country gives him the freedom to tell the story that he wants.If he wants to show how a man who made a lousy husband to his protagonist but the best ever friend whom she can trust her life with why does it become a problem? Anandi was willing to put her life at risk to get Jagya's wife out of the clutches of Akheraj and people still are stuck on exes π₯±
Originally posted by: aparnauma
What is the percentage of people who have access to Internet in our country?Among the people who have Internet access what percentage of people come and post their views on the show?What is the percentage of people who have TVs in their home?If online viewers and their opinions make so much difference why is that this shows and characters which are so popular with the online viewers and forums such as IF close down because of low TRPs?There is an article posted in the forum right now about how advertisers put money on shows like BV πAs for clubbing shows fusion episodes it is happening across the channels and in Colors they have fusion episodes for almost every show of theirs barring Ashoka which is a historical show.Ok, so basically you have no statistics / evidence to support your statement. You are simply making an analysis based on your own understanding / perception and just on those basis you are even releasing a statement " that those who express their dislike towards Anandi are only a minority"Since it's only your assumption, it's debatable. If you have proven records then let's discuss, otherwise concluding that those who dislike Anandi are minority is INVALID
Ok, so basically you have no statistics / evidence to support your statement. You are simply making an analysis based on your own understanding / perception and just on those basis you are even releasing a statement " that those who express their dislike towards Anandi are only a minority"Since it's only your assumption, it's debatable. If you have proven records then let's discuss, otherwise concluding that those who dislike Anandi are minority is INVALID
comment:
p_commentcount