{|Siya ke Ram - Episode Distortion & Frustration Thread 1|} - Page 65

Originally posted by: deejagi

</div>
<div>The fact is that Ram had not worn any jewelry and it was expected that any prince will wear some jewelry and pride. Since both were missing on his body & face and he was eager to help Mai and also to learn about cultivation, shewas not ready to believe him as a prince. But the moment she saw Lakshman with the jewelry, she concluded him as a prince and as he called Ram as bhaiyya, she accepted Rama s a Prince.

But one thing amazed me was that when the whole Mithila was filled with greenery, why only this lady's land was barren and dry an hard that even the plough could not enter in? how did this selective barren land was present in Mithila?

I agree with your explanation, even I felt so that since Ram was not wearing heavy clothes and jewellery, the lady thought he is not a prince...

Actually this lady was the same lady whose field Malyavan had destroyed for landing Ravan's aircraft..
The lady then went to Sita for help and Sita and Malyavan had a rift over it..
Sita said that the field was destroyed beyond repair and fasal can't be grown on it again...
Thus this particular patch of land was barren...

Really nice to see Ram helping the lady, whom Sita wanted to help...
I think they are yet to complete the scene.. I hope they show Ram coming back to the land , with Sita this time and together they are able to rejuvenate the field which they couldn't do alone ...

Originally posted by: aditi97

I agree with your explanation, even I felt so that since Ram was not wearing heavy clothes and jewellery, the lady thought he is not a prince...

Actually this lady was the same lady whose field Malyavan had destroyed for landing Ravan's aircraft..
The lady then went to Sita for help and Sita and Malyavan had a rift over it..
Sita said that the field was destroyed beyond repair and fasal can't be grown on it again...
Thus this particular patch of land was barren...

Really nice to see Ram helping the lady, whom Sita wanted to help...
I think they are yet to complete the scene.. I hope they show Ram coming back to the land , with Sita this time and together they are able to rejuvenate the field which they couldn't do alone ...

Wow this thread seems to be really full of fun comments...

Originally posted by: deejagi

<div>

</div>

Yes, I did recognize the lady but what confused me was that Malyavan had got the crops removed from the from the field to get the clear patch but I don't think he sprinkled some solution which made the soil rock solid that even the iron plough could not get in to it.

<div>And also how come Sita didn't let her father know about this incident and arranged some alternative land for the lady as a compensation as it happened because of her Swayamvar Invitation to Lankan King.

Maybe they have given a land for compensation but I have seen many people(old people specially) they don't want to leave their home or land no matter how much compensation is given. They have their sentiments attached to the land or house etc...So maybe that's why this lady is so keen to stay in that field and rejevunate it again..

Malyavan didn't pour any solution, but I think Ram only didn't know how to use a plough properly..
What I got from the scene that Ram wanted to learn how to cultivate, he didn't know the right technique hence was not able to plough, maybe he was taught earlier in gurukul but he is out of practice and like we see even the street vendors calculations are faster than the scholars calculation due to practice , its the same case here I guess...


But yes as said before they could have shown the hul move atleast a little bit, that's what makes me feel they are yet to complete the scene

Originally posted by: Arijit007

come to think of it, it's kind of suprising to see raavan as a negetive charecter in the show even if mr. neelkantan is a part of it.

I must admit that it felt a bit weird to see Lord Ram struggling with the hul.But I think that particular scene was meant for the purpose of highlighting yet another difference between Ram and Ravan.However,I was really surprised when the hul did not move a bit.Maybe Anu is right.Its Bhoomi Devi's way of telling Ram to rush to the swayamvar and win Sita's hand😆

I am sooo glad to see Ravan as negative even when Neelkanthan is part of the show!! Absolutely share the same feelings as you all said!! 😆😆 Read Asura, and when I came to know he is part of Siya Ke Ram I had almost lost hope of anything good... but finally good!! so well, Seeta is my favourite and I cant wait for Ram to win her hand!!! 😃

Originally posted by: amritat

I was gonna say the same thing Arijit Bhai...

Even I am surprised Ravan is so negative in a show written by Ananth Neelkanth given his reputation of blackwashing protagonists n whitewashing anti-heroes of the epics...😆

Originally posted by: CaptainSpark

I am sooo glad to see Ravan as negative even when Neelkanthan is part of the show!! Absolutely share the same feelings as you all said!! 😆😆 Read Asura, and when I came to know he is part of Siya Ke Ram I had almost lost hope of anything good... but finally good!! so well, Seeta is my favourite and I cant wait for Ram to win her hand!!! 😃

This show is good. Not like SPK or StarB where negative characters are glorified and shows are named after them.. :P :P

Hi Brishti !! 🤗Remember me from CAS forum.😉

Originally posted by: CaptainSpark

hey Amrita!! Good to see you here!! BTW whos your favourite in Ramayan? Maybe we can be in the same side this time 😉😆