Idealism Vs Realism - Page 4

Created

Last reply

Replies

104

Views

7k

Users

15

Likes

166

Frequent Posters

K.Universe. thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#31

Originally posted by: BirdieNumNum



answer to your second question: it can be on auto-pilot same as any complex robot or CPU. They can run for a long time on auto-pilot before the batteries die out..

answer to the second question would first require us to understand what one means by "mind". If by mind we mean something that has free will, then it comes down to whether we have free will. Problem with free will is it makes the world a whole lot less deterministic/ random (mixture of the two) than the laws of physics would have us believe. And that's the quandary- too much belief in physics and we think we are robots without free will...




I would equate mind with intelligence but more on that later.

The problem I see here is detecting which processes are directed and which processes are undirected.

Plants convert light energy to chemical energy to produce glucose and other organic compounds vital for their survival, via photosynthesis. Is photosynthesis a directed process or an undirected process? How do we tell?

If I pick up a ball and throw it at you (😊) it means I took a deliberate action, which then tells us that it is a directed process. Where as, if you are passing by a coconut tree and a big coconut falls on your head (😊), we tend to term it as an undirected process.

Point being, we are the ones determining which processes in this universe are directed and which are undirected. And since we assume (rightly so?) that we are the only intelligent life around, to us what we determine is what the truth must be.

To go back to the examples, a cell (plants or humans) or a robot or a CPU have traces of "design" in them implying that an intelligent being probably directed matter to turn them into functional "machines". This is so because we can perceive this intelligence. There is sufficient evidence, depending upon who you ask of course, to suspect that it is not all about physical processes, not all about material agencies.

Now, how much of this has a real objective existence and how much of it is perception is what I suppose we are interested in finding out.



souro thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#32
This topic reminded me of 'If a tree falls in a forest and no one is there to hear it, does it still make a sound'.
373577 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#33

Originally posted by: Vinzy


Is mind means past?!!!!

Do you mean past as in a flashback? 😆
-Believe- thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#34

Originally posted by: zorrro

Do you mean past as in a flashback? 😆

Ya... 'Collection of Matters'...😊
373577 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#35

Originally posted by: Vinzy

Ya... 'Collection of Matters'...😊

My dear Vinu bhai these guys are saying ki matter haich nahi. Jaab haich nahi toh collection kahan se 🤓
charminggenie thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#36

Originally posted by: K.Universe.




I would equate mind with intelligence but more on that later.

The problem I see here is detecting which processes are directed and which processes are undirected.

Plants convert light energy to chemical energy to produce glucose and other organic compounds vital for their survival, via photosynthesis. Is photosynthesis a directed process or an undirected process? How do we tell?

If I pick up a ball and throw it at you (😊) it means I took a deliberate action, which then tells us that it is a directed process. Where as, if you are passing by a coconut tree and a big coconut falls on your head (😊), we tend to term it as an undirected process.

Point being, we are the ones determining which processes in this universe are directed and which are undirected. And since we assume (rightly so?) that we are the only intelligent life around, to us what we determine is what the truth must be.

To go back to the examples, a cell (plants or humans) or a robot or a CPU have traces of "design" in them implying that an intelligent being probably directed matter to turn them into functional "machines". This is so because we can perceive this intelligence. There is sufficient evidence, depending upon who you ask of course, to suspect that it is not all about physical processes, not all about material agencies.

Now, how much of this has a real objective existence and how much of it is perception is what I suppose we are interested in finding out.





Hmm seems like this is a case of Dualism , it subscribes to the view that there is both a mental perception and an objective, outside real world. Knowledge about the outside world may not always be possible and our perception/idea about it might be equally imperfect.

So what we term as direct or indirect might not be true in itself, but because our inner mental entity as such hence our understanding.

@Bold - How would be quantify that? For us , we might say there is a greater sense of perception involved because that is how we gather our knowledge and sense, while for the unknown real world outside the periphery - there is a good chance that we will always have a very dis-balanced opinion.


charminggenie thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#37
@Vinzy - Mind is impossible to define. it is what you want it to be, information manifestation of brain, intelligence or consciousness. Take your pick?
373577 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#38
So far from what I understood of the thread there were following stand-
1- Only ideas, no matter= idealism
2- Only matter is real, ideas/mind are emergent property of matter.=realism
3- Both matter and mind have an independent existence.= Dualism?
but who has taken which stand remains a suspense--hmmm.
-Believe- thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#39

Originally posted by: zorrro

My dear Vinu bhai these guys are saying ki matter haich nahi. Jaab haich nahi toh collection kahan se 🤓


Okie...Pre-mind stage..like a baby!?!!...But How can you stop the thoughts?!!!...😊



Originally posted by: charminggenie

@Vinzy - Mind is impossible to define. it is what you want it to be, information manifestation of brain, intelligence or consciousness. Take your pick?


I agree, there are many ways of the mind. But it is all mind...and I feel, mind has the capacity to hypnotize itself and can see the object of imagination just standing before it...😊

373577 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#40

Originally posted by: Vinzy


Okie...Pre-mind stage..like a baby!?!!...But How can you stop the thoughts?!!!...😊

Babies also have mind of their own , quite nasty ones and eeewww at times .
As for thoughts- they seem to have a mind of their own too Wont stop no matter how I try .




Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".