Kunti's Dilemma: Karna or Arjun - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

43

Views

10.8k

Users

16

Likes

149

Frequent Posters

246851 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#41
It was same article which concluded durvasa can be the father, that he almost statutory raped a minor, thats why no one gav ehim much importance. And by deciding what his lineage could be does the author come to the conclusion thatkarna basically have bharadwaj angiras blood.
...Diala... thumbnail
11th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 11 years ago
#42
ok thanks.. then should be 2 articles that speak of the same.. later I will read them again..
riti4u thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 11 years ago
#43
ok... that was really long one... I could not finish the whole article... Instead I got a gist of what author really wants to say. I think this is more of author's perception .It is like He is trying to take totally different meaning .. I can make that out with his interpretation of "From Kunti's attending upon all guests' and that she used to wait, it is apparent that Kuntibhoja often used' Kunti to appease visiting Brahmanas and ascetics" this he concluded from these words in Adi Parva "'In my girlhood, O lord, I was in my father's house engaged in attending upon all guests. I used to wait respectfully upon Brahmanas of rigid vows and great ascetic merit. "
It is not clear whether Kuntibhoja used to force kunti for this or Kunti used to do this on her own... I could see Author's intent is of going with first logic and perhaps thus he has tried to give meanings to other dialogues here.
A simple question wud be ..If author thinks that Kunti cannot have a son born of Sun. How can then Kunti have sons from other celestial beings.
Nevertheless it was different and interesting read thus thanks for sharing . I totally dont concur with views mentioned in that.
See there can be many ways of looking at things. I dont say Kunti was evil .. I only say she made some mistakes and in Mahabharat everyone has made mistake so whats wrong in accepting hers too. Going to topic , i think I mentioned already what I feel so no point in repeating that. Still its nice to see so many different views.
246851 thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#44
You should read his artii on birth of pandavas to.
Yes celestial being s and divine stuff were a much later addition. Also devas could be spiritually advsnced/ powerful men who later evolved into devas.
Mb is an organism with life of its own. Many chapters have been interpolated later. That. Is why I always say there is no concrete vedvyas one person, but a group of poets and writees, often from diff conflicting schols who have flr over a period of 1000 yrs creates mb.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".