{| Doubts and Discussions about Mahabharata - 2 |} - Page 67

Created

Last reply

Replies

692

Views

78481

Users

60

Likes

1335

Frequent Posters

Vr15h thumbnail
Anniversary 15 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
Ananya, on the rest of what you wrote, there'd be no reason to manage the wives - they'd die whenever they did.  Even Draupadi, who was the first to die - when she fell, the Pandavas just moved on, and kept falling to their deaths one by one.

Chitrangada being in Hastinapur was no surprise - her dutiful place would have been next to Arjun while he was alive, but due to her responsibilities in raising Babru, she remained @ Manipur to the point that he became king.  Once they were in Hastinapur for the yagna, when it came time for Babru to return, Uloopi & Chitrangada remained w/ Arjun.  They only returned when it was time for Arjun to leave along w/ his bros.

But here too, I thought the surviving wives should have just accompanied their hubbies on that final journey.

P.S.  Why did Krishna ask Daruka to just fetch Arjun?  He could have given him the complete message to ask Yudhi to abdicate, turn over the kingdom to Parikshit and all 5 Pandavas to go to Dwarka & escort the survivors back to Mathura.  Arjun needlessly took 2 trips.
ashne thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Ananya, on the rest of what you wrote, there'd be no reason to manage the wives - they'd die whenever they did.  Even Draupadi, who was the first to die - when she fell, the Pandavas just moved on, and kept falling to their deaths one by one.

Chitrangada being in Hastinapur was no surprise - her dutiful place would have been next to Arjun while he was alive, but due to her responsibilities in raising Babru, she remained @ Manipur to the point that he became king.  Once they were in Hastinapur for the yagna, when it came time for Babru to return, Uloopi & Chitrangada remained w/ Arjun.  They only returned when it was time for Arjun to leave along w/ his bros.

But here too, I thought the surviving wives should have just accompanied their hubbies on that final journey.

P.S.  Why did Krishna ask Daruka to just fetch Arjun?  He could have given him the complete message to ask Yudhi to abdicate, turn over the kingdom to Parikshit and all 5 Pandavas to go to Dwarka & escort the survivors back to Mathura.  Arjun needlessly took 2 trips.


I thot so too. It must have been pretty depressing for the ladies to live there without children and husbands, Parikshit was there, but still ðŸ˜’
ananyacool thumbnail
Anniversary 15 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail Engager 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: ashne

Babruvahan would have been an adult by the end of the war, right. Considering that he was born during Arjun's vanvas. So Chitra being in Hastinapur, seems logical.  And he also fights Arjun, as a king, if I'm not mistaken during Ashwamedha.

Agreed on the part, Chitrangada being in Hastinapur. Yes Babruvahan fights and kills Arjun and revived later by Ulupi in Ashwamedhika Parva.

 

Originally posted by: ashne

Abhi was considered young, when he died around 36 yrs of age. So I guess a 15 yr old Parikshit sitting on uttara's lap is not surprising. I have read that the Pandavas, themselves were in their 40s and 50s during Drau swayamvar.

Abhi was called a 'mere boy' because the people around him were 80, 90 and Bhishm was 100 +
In Ashramvasika Parva chapter 3 : five and ten years( after war) had passed when the old king Dhrirashtra resolved on going to forest along with Gandhari, Kunti too joins them.
Then in chapter 15 Uttara is mentioned as the one who had recently become a mother!
10 chapter's later Sanjay is introducing Pandavas, and their wives , Kaurava widows and Uttara to various sages present there; Parikshit is sitting on Uttara's lap
If he is born during Ashwamedhika parva and still sits on his mother's lap, being a 15 year old, its too much to take.

 

Originally posted by: ashne

How was Subhi the next senior. Wasn't Devika, Valandara, Uloopi and Chithrangadha senior to her at least in station. Or was she chosen because she was biologically related to both Parikshit and Vajra.

 
Devika is just mentioned once in Adiparva (Sambhava sub parva) later she is missing. If she were there then would be mentioned and she would follow Yudhi to forest but it is not so. The other wives are not mentioned taking part in matter of politics,; Yudhi specifically asks Subhi to take care of Parikshit as you say because he was her grandson

Originally posted by: ashne

  So Mahaprasthanika is not written by Vyasa?

 
 
If you find time read John Brockington's literary criticism on Mahabharat specially post war parvas. He clearly says Sauptika, Shanti Anushasana and Mahaprasthanika a later additions and he is not alone to say so . These were added time to time
Edited by ananyacool - 9 years ago
ananyacool thumbnail
Anniversary 15 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail Engager 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

Ananya, on the rest of what you wrote, there'd be no reason to manage the wives - they'd die whenever they did.  Even Draupadi, who was the first to die - when she fell, the Pandavas just moved on, and kept falling to their deaths one by one.

You took it seriously 
In Mahaprasthan only Yudhi and Bhima are talking. Conversation between Soul (Yudhi) and Vital breath /mukhya PraNa (Bhim) . P.V Vartak's research confirms that after the vital breath's release from the body, it takes interest in surrounding and is curious same goes to Bhima, he asks why each one is falling he is curious.
Draupadi the mouth piece of Pandavas/the speech falls first because in Upanishads its mentioned that when a body goes through natural death, it loses speech first! plus she is agni and agni is mouth of all devas so mouth/speech ceases first. The soul says that speech is partial to 'Mind' / Arjuna. So that is a lapse in  its part. Naku-Dev are eyes and ears respectively.
What is not mentioned is that extreme sadness grips their heart ( shokakul,shoksantaptaH) when Draupadi falls and they're not able to walk with same speed they were walking and soon fall down themselves. This what happens to Naku-Dev and Arjun . Yudhi too when meets Indra is pleading every now and then to take him to place where his brothers and wife are;conveniently forgotten by scholars/feminsts who have vested interests 

Originally posted by: Vrish

Chitrangada being in Hastinapur was no surprise - her dutiful place would have been next to Arjun while he was alive, but due to her responsibilities in raising Babru, she remained @ Manipur to the point that he became king.  Once they were in Hastinapur for the yagna, when it came time for Babru to return, Uloopi & Chitrangada remained w/ Arjun.  They only returned when it was time for Arjun to leave along w/ his bros.

Agreed

But here too, I thought the surviving wives should have just accompanied their hubbies on that final journey.
 
No answer why other wives didn't follow🤔

Originally posted by: Vrish

P.S.  Why did Krishna ask Daruka to just fetch Arjun?  He could have given him the complete message to ask Yudhi to abdicate, turn over the kingdom to Parikshit and all 5 Pandavas to go to Dwarka & escort the survivors back to Mathura.  Arjun needlessly took 2 trips.

 
The rescuing tasks, battling is done by Arjun throughout the epic, he is always ready to maintain law and order ; he was appointed as army chief (?)
Krishna was Arjun's sakha so he could easily order him and probably he couldn't tell Yudhi to abdicate throne, maybe he didn't share that rapport to tell him that . Those decisions have to be voluntary.
Edited by ananyacool - 9 years ago
ananyacool thumbnail
Anniversary 15 Thumbnail Group Promotion 3 Thumbnail Engager 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: .Vrish.


Bold above - IIRC, this happens before Vyasa gives everybody a darshan of their beloved dead.  When Dhrit wishes to see Dury & others, everybody is brought back.  Dhrit  & Gandhari get greeted by Dury & his bros, Kunti gets to meet Karna, who gets reconciled w/ the Pandavas.  Abhimanyu rejoins Subhadra & Uttara, Draupadi is joined by her 5 sons, Dhrishtadyumna, Drupada & others, and everyone comes together.

When it's time for the dead to leave, Vyasa invites the Kshatrani widows to cast off their bodies in the water and leave.  Nobody is named, but one can conclude that all the widows who were still living in Hastinapur under the care of the Pandavas got to rejoin their hubbies.  I therefore concluded that Uttara too used the opportunity to leave Parikshit w/ Arjun/Subhi and join Abhimanyu.

Here is the relevant citation - I mentioned that a few pages ago actually -on pg 69

 
In this Chapter of Ashramvasika no specific mention of Uttara taking Jal Samadhi ; the Kaurava ladies had a strong reason , they had lost everybody so that choose death . In my opinion Uttara wouldn't have been allowed by her in-laws too ; if epic mentions Parikshit the only survivor then both Uttara and Parikshit should have been special.
ashne thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: ananyacool


In Mahaprasthan only Yudhi and Bhima are talking. Conversation between Soul (Yudhi) and Vital breath /mukhya PraNa (Bhim) . P.V Vartak's research confirms that after the vital breath's release from the body, it takes interest in surrounding and is curious same goes to Bhima, he asks why each one is falling he is curious.
Draupadi the mouth piece of Pandavas/the speech falls first because in Upanishads its mentioned that when a body goes through natural death, it loses speech first! plus she is agni and agni is mouth of all devas so mouth/speech ceases first. The soul says that speech is partial to 'Mind' / Arjuna. So that is a lapse in  its part. Naku-Dev are eyes and ears respectively.
What is not mentioned is that extreme sadness grips their heart ( shokakul,shoksantaptaH) when Draupadi falls and they're not able to walk with same speed they were walking and soon fall down themselves. This what happens to Naku-Dev and Arjun . Yudhi too when meets Indra is pleading every now and then to take him to place where his brothers and wife are;conveniently forgotten by scholars/feminsts who have vested interests 



I recently read an article on boloji.com, where the author explains the same reasoning as above. Drau being the 'vak'' and it is natural for speech to be the first to go. Followed by the ones sense organs (Nak/Sah), the mind (Arjun), the Prana (Bhima and the Soul (yudhi). He also mentions how their pace slackens as they hear Drau fall and their heart is filled with great grief.
ashne thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: ashne

  So Mahaprasthanika is not written by Vyasa?

 
 

If you find time read John Brockington's literary criticism on Mahabharat specially post war parvas. He clearly says Sauptika, Shanti Anushasana and Mahaprasthanika a later additions and he is not alone to say so . These were added time to time

 
Will try to get a copy of that. And yes, I did read on 'boloji', that the author there doesn't just think that it could have been added later, but specifically says so.
Edited by ashne - 9 years ago
ashne thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: .Vrish.


P.S.  Why did Krishna ask Daruka to just fetch Arjun?  He could have given him the complete message to ask Yudhi to abdicate, turn over the kingdom to Parikshit and all 5 Pandavas to go to Dwarka & escort the survivors back to Mathura.  Arjun needlessly took 2 trips.

 

The rescuing tasks, battling is done by Arjun throughout the epic, he is always ready to maintain law and order ; he was appointed as army chief (?)
Krishna was Arjun's sakha so he could easily order him and probably he couldn't tell Yudhi to abdicate throne, maybe he didn't share that rapport to tell him that . 
Those decisions have to be voluntary.

 




Actually it is mentioned that after Arjun's defeat and his subsequent talk with Vyasa, it is Arjun who resolves to retire and the other brothers approve the same.
Edited by ashne - 9 years ago
Vr15h thumbnail
Anniversary 15 Thumbnail Group Promotion 7 Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: ananyacool

 
In this Chapter of Ashramvasika no specific mention of Uttara taking Jal Samadhi ; the Kaurava ladies had a strong reason , they had lost everybody so that choose death . In my opinion Uttara wouldn't have been allowed by her in-laws too ; if epic mentions Parikshit the only survivor then both Uttara and Parikshit should have been special.



Actually, the Kaurava women had DG, who they could have accompanied into exile, but didn't.  Kunti too had a strong reason - she had abandoned her  sons and serving like a concubine to Dhritarashtra (where else does a SIL accompany her BIL - according to Manu's samhitas, she should have stayed w/ her sons to the  end, as Shrimad Bhagvatam seems to suggest).  She too could have taken the route.  But alas, Pandu wasn't among the visitors 🤔

But if you notice, the passage explicitly says 'Kshatriya ladies' instead of 'Kaurava ladies' (and there too, Vaisampayana loosely uses the term 'Kaurava' to refer to the Pandavas as well.  Which is what led me to the above conclusion.  Also, as you point out, Parikshit was sitting on  Uttara's lap in part 25, whereas the jal-samadhi took place in part 33.

Wasn't it you who in the Ramayan forum once pointed out to me how men put their wives on their left lap & other relatives on their right?  If they could do that, why would it be strange for Uttara to put her 15 year old son on her lap?

The term 'recent' is nebulous - it is loosely used, like much of Vyasa's/Vaisampayana's writing.  Uttara was pregnant at Abhimanyu's death and gave birth during the Ashwamedha yagna.  There is no way she could have held Parikshit in her womb for 15 years
ashne thumbnail
Anniversary 13 Thumbnail Group Promotion 6 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago

Originally posted by: ananyacool

 
In this Chapter of Ashramvasika no specific mention of Uttara taking Jal Samadhi ; the Kaurava ladies had a strong reason , they had lost everybody so that choose death . In my opinion Uttara wouldn't have been allowed by her in-laws too ; if epic mentions Parikshit the only survivor then both Uttara and Parikshit should have been special.



Originally posted by: .Vrish.


Actually, the Kaurava women had DG, who they could have accompanied into exile, but didn't.  Kunti too had a strong reason - she had abandoned her  sons and serving like a concubine to Dhritarashtra (where else does a SIL accompany her BIL - according to Manu's samhitas, she should have stayed w/ her sons to the  end, as Shrimad Bhagvatam seems to suggest).  She too could have taken the route.  But alas, Pandu wasn't among the visitors 🤔

But if you notice, the passage explicitly says 'Kshatriya ladies' instead of 'Kaurava ladies' (and there too, Vaisampayana loosely uses the term 'Kaurava' to refer to the Pandavas as well.  Which is what led me to the above conclusion.  Also, as you point out, Parikshit was sitting on  Uttara's lap in part 25, whereas the jal-samadhi took place in part 33.

Wasn't it you who in the Ramayan forum once pointed out to me how men put their wives on their left lap & other relatives on their right?  If they could do that, why would it be strange for Uttara to put her 15 year old son on her lap?

The term 'recent' is nebulous - it is loosely used, like much of Vyasa's/Vaisampayana's writing.  Uttara was pregnant at Abhimanyu's death and gave birth during the Ashwamedha yagna.  There is no way she could have held Parikshit in her womb for 15 years


Vrish - So for a lady the only 2 options during her senior yrs - were either go on an exile to the forest with her husband (if she has one) or stay with her sons (if she was a widow) ?

Has there never been an instance where a woman retires to the forest on her own?