Ananya, on the rest of what you wrote, there'd be no reason to manage the wives - they'd die whenever they did. Even Draupadi, who was the first to die - when she fell, the Pandavas just moved on, and kept falling to their deaths one by one.
Chitrangada being in Hastinapur was no surprise - her dutiful place would have been next to Arjun while he was alive, but due to her responsibilities in raising Babru, she remained @ Manipur to the point that he became king. Once they were in Hastinapur for the yagna, when it came time for Babru to return, Uloopi & Chitrangada remained w/ Arjun. They only returned when it was time for Arjun to leave along w/ his bros.But here too, I thought the surviving wives should have just accompanied their hubbies on that final journey.P.S. Why did Krishna ask Daruka to just fetch Arjun? He could have given him the complete message to ask Yudhi to abdicate, turn over the kingdom to Parikshit and all 5 Pandavas to go to Dwarka & escort the survivors back to Mathura. Arjun needlessly took 2 trips.
Babruvahan would have been an adult by the end of the war, right. Considering that he was born during Arjun's vanvas. So Chitra being in Hastinapur, seems logical. And he also fights Arjun, as a king, if I'm not mistaken during Ashwamedha.
Abhi was considered young, when he died around 36 yrs of age. So I guess a 15 yr old Parikshit sitting on uttara's lap is not surprising. I have read that the Pandavas, themselves were in their 40s and 50s during Drau swayamvar.
How was Subhi the next senior. Wasn't Devika, Valandara, Uloopi and Chithrangadha senior to her at least in station. Or was she chosen because she was biologically related to both Parikshit and Vajra.
So Mahaprasthanika is not written by Vyasa?
Ananya, on the rest of what you wrote, there'd be no reason to manage the wives - they'd die whenever they did. Even Draupadi, who was the first to die - when she fell, the Pandavas just moved on, and kept falling to their deaths one by one.
AgreedChitrangada being in Hastinapur was no surprise - her dutiful place would have been next to Arjun while he was alive, but due to her responsibilities in raising Babru, she remained @ Manipur to the point that he became king. Once they were in Hastinapur for the yagna, when it came time for Babru to return, Uloopi & Chitrangada remained w/ Arjun. They only returned when it was time for Arjun to leave along w/ his bros.
P.S. Why did Krishna ask Daruka to just fetch Arjun? He could have given him the complete message to ask Yudhi to abdicate, turn over the kingdom to Parikshit and all 5 Pandavas to go to Dwarka & escort the survivors back to Mathura. Arjun needlessly took 2 trips.
Bold above - IIRC, this happens before Vyasa gives everybody a darshan of their beloved dead. When Dhrit wishes to see Dury & others, everybody is brought back. Dhrit & Gandhari get greeted by Dury & his bros, Kunti gets to meet Karna, who gets reconciled w/ the Pandavas. Abhimanyu rejoins Subhadra & Uttara, Draupadi is joined by her 5 sons, Dhrishtadyumna, Drupada & others, and everyone comes together.
When it's time for the dead to leave, Vyasa invites the Kshatrani widows to cast off their bodies in the water and leave. Nobody is named, but one can conclude that all the widows who were still living in Hastinapur under the care of the Pandavas got to rejoin their hubbies. I therefore concluded that Uttara too used the opportunity to leave Parikshit w/ Arjun/Subhi and join Abhimanyu.
Here is the relevant citation - I mentioned that a few pages ago actually -on pg 69
In this Chapter of Ashramvasika no specific mention of Uttara taking Jal Samadhi ; the Kaurava ladies had a strong reason , they had lost everybody so that choose death . In my opinion Uttara wouldn't have been allowed by her in-laws too ; if epic mentions Parikshit the only survivor then both Uttara and Parikshit should have been special.
Originally posted by: ananyacool
In Mahaprasthan only Yudhi and Bhima are talking. Conversation between Soul (Yudhi) and Vital breath /mukhya PraNa (Bhim) . P.V Vartak's research confirms that after the vital breath's release from the body, it takes interest in surrounding and is curious same goes to Bhima, he asks why each one is falling he is curious.Draupadi the mouth piece of Pandavas/the speech falls first because in Upanishads its mentioned that when a body goes through natural death, it loses speech first! plus she is agni and agni is mouth of all devas so mouth/speech ceases first. The soul says that speech is partial to 'Mind' / Arjuna. So that is a lapse in its part. Naku-Dev are eyes and ears respectively.What is not mentioned is that extreme sadness grips their heart ( shokakul,shoksantaptaH) when Draupadi falls and they're not able to walk with same speed they were walking and soon fall down themselves. This what happens to Naku-Dev and Arjun . Yudhi too when meets Indra is pleading every now and then to take him to place where his brothers and wife are;conveniently forgotten by scholars/feminsts who have vested interests
So Mahaprasthanika is not written by Vyasa?
If you find time read John Brockington's literary criticism on Mahabharat specially post war parvas. He clearly says Sauptika, Shanti Anushasana and Mahaprasthanika a later additions and he is not alone to say so . These were added time to time
P.S. Why did Krishna ask Daruka to just fetch Arjun? He could have given him the complete message to ask Yudhi to abdicate, turn over the kingdom to Parikshit and all 5 Pandavas to go to Dwarka & escort the survivors back to Mathura. Arjun needlessly took 2 trips.
The rescuing tasks, battling is done by Arjun throughout the epic, he is always ready to maintain law and order ; he was appointed as army chief (?)Krishna was Arjun's sakha so he could easily order him and probably he couldn't tell Yudhi to abdicate throne, maybe he didn't share that rapport to tell him that .Those decisions have to be voluntary.Actually it is mentioned that after Arjun's defeat and his subsequent talk with Vyasa, it is Arjun who resolves to retire and the other brothers approve the same.
Originally posted by: ananyacool
In this Chapter of Ashramvasika no specific mention of Uttara taking Jal Samadhi ; the Kaurava ladies had a strong reason , they had lost everybody so that choose death . In my opinion Uttara wouldn't have been allowed by her in-laws too ; if epic mentions Parikshit the only survivor then both Uttara and Parikshit should have been special.
Originally posted by: ananyacool
In this Chapter of Ashramvasika no specific mention of Uttara taking Jal Samadhi ; the Kaurava ladies had a strong reason , they had lost everybody so that choose death . In my opinion Uttara wouldn't have been allowed by her in-laws too ; if epic mentions Parikshit the only survivor then both Uttara and Parikshit should have been special.
Actually, the Kaurava women had DG, who they could have accompanied into exile, but didn't. Kunti too had a strong reason - she had abandoned her sons and serving like a concubine to Dhritarashtra (where else does a SIL accompany her BIL - according to Manu's samhitas, she should have stayed w/ her sons to the end, as Shrimad Bhagvatam seems to suggest). She too could have taken the route. But alas, Pandu wasn't among the visitors 🤔But if you notice, the passage explicitly says 'Kshatriya ladies' instead of 'Kaurava ladies' (and there too, Vaisampayana loosely uses the term 'Kaurava' to refer to the Pandavas as well. Which is what led me to the above conclusion. Also, as you point out, Parikshit was sitting on Uttara's lap in part 25, whereas the jal-samadhi took place in part 33.Wasn't it you who in the Ramayan forum once pointed out to me how men put their wives on their left lap & other relatives on their right? If they could do that, why would it be strange for Uttara to put her 15 year old son on her lap?The term 'recent' is nebulous - it is loosely used, like much of Vyasa's/Vaisampayana's writing. Uttara was pregnant at Abhimanyu's death and gave birth during the Ashwamedha yagna. There is no way she could have held Parikshit in her womb for 15 years
comment:
p_commentcount