Sultan's Harem for his Sexy Sirens~ CC#5 *IO* - Page 17

"Aahaana, gayatridevika, pooja1210, roma2011, Viviandsenarox, ..Bournville.., -Misek-, -CuteChic-, ennishet, RockchickFaiza, Vmpysis, M.Hurr, "

all the likes on that note 😉

make a direct post in the main forum...we all will support...i am not supporting pms...its all hidden and modz dont take action

Firstly, I mentioned in the first few sentences that these issues have cropped up in the last few ATs. No where does it say in this specific AT.

Second, how does calling someone's opinion heights of idiocy not bashing? Or how does commenting on a particular fan base on another forum acceptable? It was not simple links of topics and reporting requests. The 3 page limit was for spamming and random talk. Talk that does not involve members or falls out of the rules/COC. Likewise, you can't use the 3 page limit on a repetitive basis. -Fivr- or no -Fivr-, the verdict would have been the same as we're one team and this is a team decision.

Yes you are free to discuss via Sultan's perspective but does gushing on Sulbala have anything to do with Sultan's perspective. Gushing is done by members. We gave the member Sulbala Hub for a reason. Forget the members and Sulbala for a second, but what about the VD and VD fans comments that went on in AT# 25? How is that acceptable? VD is not related to Sultan.

Name calling - as I mentioned in the note, you can't use the name as a replacement. Furthermore, members in the Sultan AT were refering to Madhu as a B****, not once but a few times. That all falls under name calling.

And Nafs, I don't like leaving notes for fun and closing ATs. It's not my hobby. You have broken the rules on the repetitive basis hence why the AT was closed.

I'm sorry that I disappointed you but perhaps its time to see what actually happened in the AT rather than covering up for your fellow members.

coz i will go call R najayaz everywhere

I have no idea why gushing on Sulbala is said not to be Sultan's perspective? Huh?