Savita stated wrong facts - Page 9

when will savita be exposed????????

I could not believe it when Manav told Archana it was not her fault at all for what happened to Soham... This begs the question: WHAT WAS THE POINT OF THE 18 YEARS SEPARATION???????

Originally posted by: JulieD

I could not believe it when Manav told Archana it was not her fault at all for what happened to Soham...

This begs the question: WHAT WAS THE POINT OF THE 18 YEARS SEPARATION???????

Why did he separate Ovi-Teju and Sachin from their mother then?

Manav is just an idiot..was feeling sorry for him but not anymore...

He encourages Archana's ridiculous behaviour. I mean, where does that woman come up with her logics?

Agree with some parts of your post except bold. I would not say Manav really encourages Archana's ridiculous behavior. That's actually Sulo who encourages Archu's behavior. It's Manav who doesn't put a stop to it when needed I wouldn't say he really encourages it.

And Manav did not separate Ovi-Teju and Sachin from Archana Archana herself did not want her children or her care for them enough she just cared about her mom and her sister. And Manav couldn't leave his children with Archana considering what she had done with Soham
Edited by bhallarox - 11 years ago

Originally posted by: bhallarox

Agree with some parts of your post except bold. I would not say Manav really encourages Archana's ridiculous behavior. That's actually Sulo who encourages Archu's behavior. It's Manav who doesn't put a stop to it when needed I wouldn't say he really encourages it.

And Manav did not separate Ovi-Teju and Sachin from Archana Archana herself did not want her children or her care for them enough she just cared about her mom and her sister. And Manav couldn't leave his children with Archana considering what she had done with Soham

Edited by Dabulls23 - 11 years ago

Originally posted by: Dabulls23

 

JulieD and Bhalla

 

Julie has made some great points 👏...If Manav does not think Archana being responsible for what happened to Soham, than what was the reason for seperation?  It could not be Archan's court case against Manav right...As they both lived together for atleast 18 months and during that time Archu got pregnant, delivered twin girls and they celebrated twin's first bday. 

 

So if Archana not responsible than it has to be Manav taking Twins away from Archana w/o a reason right ?   Julie has made a brilliant point 👏 I guess Manav had gone temporarily insane and w/o a cause he decided to take the twins away from their mother and move to Canada 😆 Kya baat kya baat kya baat Mithun Duh ishtyle..ROFL..

 

Apparently what happened 18 yrs back reg Soham VS what CVs are trying to shove it down our throat is totally two different things...😡

 

NEways Archana and Manav both are enablers...Archana enabled Varsha's behavior, Manav enables Archana's behavior...Its the drug user and the person who lives them and keeps feeling sorry for them...I can't ignore the fact and cholk it at up as "Archana's foolishness" 😲

 

Yeah initially we can say she was young, immature and made some mistakes but you dont keep making the same mistakes because after the first mistake it is a developed "Habit" And being pacified by her mother with "Archu can't do no wrong" gives her the audacity that she is always right..😳

 

The scene between Savita and archana today abt Soham was like once Archana got the assurance from manav that she was not guilty or responsible for Soham so she got the courage to blackmail and throw another issue abt Soham's adoption in Savita's face..

 

Two seperate issues and Archana was trying to mix them...Oh well..Manav jaaye bhaad me...When a man cant take care of and protect his children from careless mother than I blame him more than her...🤔

 

The scenerios SW1 and Kalapi mentioned in their posts were to the greater scale but the logic is same...Mother protected Jiju insted of protecting her own child...Here Manav is protecting his foolish wife instead of his children..No marriage would survive with the events that had happened in ArMan's lives-marriage due to Archana and her Mayka..Manav has also done his share initially so he is not off the hook either...Compared to that what Savita did is a moot subject...If marriage is not on a strong ground any one can come and break it..If ArMan's marriage was strong with understanding, respect, trust and love than they would have never let anyone else come between them let alone it be Savita or silly Karanjkars..😡

Wonderful post Varsha Di actually come to think of it I think Julie has made an awesome point. Yes suddenly Manav starts assuring Archana that she was nowhere wrong for Soham's kidnap he definitely does enable and pacify Archu's behavior and lets her get away with anything.

Today what Archu said to Savita that why do you keep holding me responsible for what happened to Soham was a joke indeed. She starts mixing issues and brings in Soham's adoption. Why are the CVs trying to ignore all of Archu's past mistakes is what I don't understand at all convieniently throwing all the blame on Savita for what happened to Soham. The problem with Manav is he scolds Archana for her mistake but he is too inconsistent he then regrets it later on he definitely needs to be more firm and assertive with Archana which I doubt he will do and be more protective of his children

This is how I see it, bear with me 😃

I disagree with respect...Again this is my POV only.  Yes Manav needed to protect his children from Archana and her sister..There were plenty of reasons why..They may not need protection now as they all are adults but than 18 yrs back they sure did... Edited by Dabulls23 - 11 years ago

Dear dabulls, by saying that it would have been better for Soham to have been adopted, I was merely saying it would have been the lesser of two evils, he would have grown up before his very parents' eyes and he would have had a better upbringing than he has had amongst those goons now. Of course, without a doubt, the very best option would have been for him to remain with ARMAN, no question about that at all. That is why I wrote the child was theirs and Varsha had no business doing what she did.

Oh Dear SW1 the sad part is ArMan and Satish all have played part in Varsha's behavior as she was led to believe that she could have soham...This was all due to Archana's weak unjustified love and guilt for her sister.. Edited by Dabulls23 - 11 years ago

Hi Varsha, Bhalla and everyone else. How are you guys doing? 🤗
I've completely lost interest in PR, and am very busy in the last stages of my graduation along with some exciting things in my personal life. So please forgive me for disappearing after posting something and not responding to your replies. I know I've done that a few times, so sorry! 😳


Coming to this much-debated topic, Archana and only Archana is at fault for Soham's last kidnap and disappearance. Not Savita. Not Manav. Not even Varsha. The cancelled adoption had transpired more than 2 years before the events of the twins birthday party. So while that may have added to varsha's obsession for Soham, it did not have anything to do with the events at the party. At the birthday party of the twins, Varsha did not want to carry Soham. When Manav refused to give Soham to Varsha, she specifically told Archana she didn't want to hold Soham. She might have really, really wanted to---but she stopped herself and clearly told that Manav was right and Soham should be with Manav. But Archana listened to neither of them and took Soham from a protesting Manav's arms and handed him to a Varsha who was probably reining in her obsession for Soham with difficulty. She wanted Manav to believe Varsha was rehabilitated and could be trusted with Soham, and cared zilch for either Manav's or Varsha's opinions on the matter. She specifically told manav she was taking responsibility of her actions, but did not supervise Varsha or Soham. In fact she forgot about them until Manav asked her.

It's like when an alcoholic or a drug addict who's just quit and trying to stay away from his object of addiction; and some fool says that he has to carry alcohol/drugs in his hands without supervision or consuming it just to prove he's truly quit. In the analogy, the addict would probably have gone back to his addiction undoing all his efforts at quitting, but with no other apparent or immediate harm. In the show however, the object of obsession was a defenseless child who was callously handed by the mother to the person with a prior history of kidnapping the same child just to prove a point. And I don't believe her grieving for Soham either. Maybe part of it was; but she was most concerned that Manav thought she was responsible for losing Soham and that it was Varsha who broke her trust and was at fault, not that Soham was actually lost. The court case against Manav was the same--- she filed a court case against him and personally testified her husband was ambitious and probably did fraud; and she didn't know why Manav was upset with her. She never accepted that she was wrong in that either. To date, she hasn't accepted any part in what have been and continue to be major mistakes and could probably be called crimes by the Child Protection Services in some countries.

She was and is an unfit mother, and a danger to her children because of her need to do anything to prove what she thinks is right. That can be good sometimes, but more often it's not especially because she has nothing in the upper compartment and the things people call judgement and gut instincts are missing. She can be very strong when she needs to be; going against everybody to prove what she thinks is right. She just couldn't be bothered to be strong for her children; any of them. Not Soham, not Sachu when what he needs is to be told he's being foolish and she will not give into his demands; and not Ovi-Teju when they need to know that they weren't abandoned. The oft-repeated excuse of Archana being a fool with good intentions does not excuse children being endangered or lives being destroyed. It's best to cut the fool off, or give him/her minimum power so that there's minimum damage. Not empower the fool to run people's lives for them. A mistake is when it happens once or twice; not when it's repeated again and again. That's just habit.