Posted:
No way, for me its the face, then the arse then the legs then the stumach, then everything else.
Beauty , attractiveness and sexuality are related but not the same for all.Originally posted by: Polki_Zofi
For women it was always her beauty, or rather sexuality which was the major aspect, as for some reason I thought people undermine her equal talent potential?
I think Indian women now are very empowered and doing well too 😊
As for character, I think that is the important factor in any men. Some men think that the lighter character they have is more attractive (i found this realisation in some places, can be right for you or not).... but I feel that the serious women like to see more character in men to look up to!
As for women and character, it is equally important. But character have so many implications, which one you look for?
Character is must for any creature ... it its in some particular region you are looking for, remember that there is always a tradeoff present too. You cannot have everything in one package - a very false dream-world created by media people 🤣
Ah Angie relationships are very complicated, for myself I am not very good at understanding them or sorting them out.😆Originally posted by: angie.4u
Trust summer to start a topic like this after a chat 😆 Isnt it quite possible that the girl is fed up with her boyfriend because he has neither physical beauty nor character ...and the girl didnt have a mind either or else she would have noticed it much earlier ?
Thank God we have you to see things clearly and unravel them.😆Originally posted by: return_to_hades
Light hearted topic is fine, but Summer W*H are we even debating here?
I've been across the world reading this.
At first I thought it was discussing legs. But then I thought we are debating what is the best physical feature for women. Between the legs on both counts.
Anyway, then I figured this is a debate between physical beauty and character, which is more important. Thats a tough one. Character is of most importance, but we have to be real - there is a bit of shallow in all of us.
Then I thought it was about Beatriz Recari, but then are we discussing her, are we discussing golf, are we discussing women in golf or are we discussing female athletes. I need a sniper to hone in on this one.
Now you say its about your friend fed up with boyfriends, and mental attitude in relationships. Thats worthy, but I do wonder how did you make you think of legs first?
Now we better zero in on something to debate, or I might have to move this as a chat on women.
yes it does I agree. It will also give us a lot of confidence, but there is a danger of being arrogant .Originally posted by: vishmewell
We can't conclude that either beauty or character is a clear winner. Character is definitely important but a beautiful body will boost your self esteem.
yes you must be speaking from experience.Originally posted by: chal_phek_mat
For a practical side
Physical beauty and/or personality are important, far more important than Character. You can be weasal and beautiful/handsome and you will go places.In theory/books/code of conduct manuals character is important
For physical beauty dont you think the figure and frame is most important first, then the face and other things come in ?😆No way, for me its the face, then the arse then the legs then the stumach, then everything else.
To some a good character is the beauty they seek too.Originally posted by: Angel-likeDevil
I guess it's the physical beauty.. 😆
It's the character for me.
comment:
p_commentcount