Manikkam:
It is worth noting that the word family originally meant a band of slaves. Even after the word came to apply to people affiliated by blood and marriage, for many centuries the notion of family referred to authority relations rather than love ones. The sentimentalization of family life and female nurturing was historically and functionally linked to the emergence of competitive individualism and formal social equality for men and women (quote from Stephanie Coontz from "The Way We Never Were"). Why do we hear so much about the family nowadays? The stories seem to be more negative (i.e., stories of family violence and failures to properly care of interests of one or more family members.) than positive.
What is the role of a son to his mother? What is the role of a husband to his wife? What is the role of a brother to his siblings? What is the rolf of a man to his in-laws? If there can be a time- relationship curve (X-Y) drawn to represent a man's relationship with all the above family bindings, Manikkam's graph would swing between the positive and negative very often and it is seldom steady. Ideally, it can be stated to be near or just above the zero; But how often we meet people with such a graph with all family bindings? Is it even possible to have a steady graph with all relationships that form Manikkam's world?
Manikkam is a very average man, not a highly educated, not exposed to a very civilized family environment, brought up a single parent (mother) who herself is uneducated, did not have a regular job to pay for the living after her husband's death, impatient, partial, self centered, rude, loves only her children and can not love anyone outside that circle. Result of such an up-bringing is Manikkam, who loves and hates the people not based on their virtue, but based on what they can return him. He develops relationship and friendship that would nurture his basic need for money and pleasure. And if there is anything that disturbs the ballet between his gain and pleasure, he attacks back, without considering the consequence or even he expects the consequence to be fair to him. Like this, he is a average (below average in many respects) man, symbolizes the good percentage of low income family man.
Manikkam's eyes are shut outside his family, his mother's (Rajam) well being, his brother's (Selvam) and sister's (Nirmala) well being, his business (or the thing which feeds his purse). He sees his wife Saro as an outsider-insider and he expects her to reflect his temper and mood all the times, irrespective of Saro's self pride or esteem. To top this, he had pre-marital sexual relationship, which continued for a while even after the wedding with Saro.
Manikkam respects his father in law, but is bent strongly by his love for his mother. He likes his brother, but helpless and not strategic to bring goodness into his brother's life. He goes back and forth between doing good and bad. He shows signs of improvement and signs to correct himself often, but he has to work hard on that, particularly in making his mother realize that his wife Saro is not going to steal and rob him away from his mother, brother and sister.
-Siva
Edited by Siva - 19 years ago
comment:
p_commentcount