Thendral Update: Thurs Apr 26 2012 - Page 4

Originally posted by: maha2us

AnnaJay, It is OK, if you say the word used for the director could be avoided. Otherwise, I guess criticizing the storyline or the director can be accepted. Hope sometimes, the constructive criticism even helps. Many serials call for (constructive) criticisms. Why not Thendral? Incidentally my last post though is criticizing the character, indirectly criticizes the director or the story writer also. I may have preferred Thulasi concentrating on studies instead of getting into this type of fight.

I think AnnaJay comment where she requested to avoid criticizing in the way she meant bashing the director is not allowed in particular not using words and she neatly requested to confirm with things and critisize but not to bash...i think i will put it more clear...When bashing characters are not allowed bashing real time people are allowed? this is one of the guildelines that need to be followed and it is well seen prominently in the rules and regulations of the forum...if we critisise characters i think that is agreeable and even pointing out mistake is agreeable and allowed...wnich everyone does but bashing is not allowed...hope i m more clear now...your comment is only criticizing and not bashing and not an issue at all and if same done personally with real people not allowed i mean bashing but constructive critisism r allowed...

Originally posted by: Caryn

Thulasi - legally adopted? Excuse me she is a major, she cannot be legally adopted. Aiyoh... aiyoh... give me the wall please. I need to bang my head. 🤣🤣🤣

Indian citizens who are Hindus, Jains, Sikhs, or Buddhists are allowed to formally adopt a child. The adoption is under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act of 1956. Under this act, a single parent or married couple are not permitted to adopt more than one child of the same sex.

Many websites only specifies the age restrictions for the parent to adopt and not for the child. It says the childs adoption age is relaxed.

I thk it is possible to nominate anyone as a legal heir of someone's propery and if TPS told so it might look bad and hence guess CTS used word adoption

Thank you Ranuuu for the wonderful update.. 🤗 🤗

Thank you Ranu for the update.. 👏

Originally posted by: Shamz.

Thankss Ravvai for the wonderful Update!👏🤗

Awww TPS adopting Thulss😍 I loved the bgm and Thuls expression when she told that...Wonderful scene..TA innum how many MILs u want?🤣 Like Rans told he is scared that Thuls will leave him alone nu, athan he himself first eh told😆

Prabha is another Thulasi😆 Haha wants them now vam😃 Avanga innum varave illa, ithula thinking about hosp ellam😆

Hahaha Anand😆 Another XXX ah? Plsss no copyyy, show something neww😭

Originally posted by: shubba

I think AnnaJay comment where she requested to avoid criticizing in the way she meant bashing the director is not allowed in particular not using words and she neatly requested to confirm with things and critisize but not to bash...i think i will put it more clear...When bashing characters are not allowed bashing real time people are allowed? this is one of the guildelines that need to be followed and it is well seen prominently in the rules and regulations of the forum...if we critisise characters i think that is agreeable and even pointing out mistake is agreeable and allowed...wnich everyone does but bashing is not allowed...hope i m more clear now...your comment is only criticizing and not bashing and not an issue at all and if same done personally with real people not allowed i mean bashing but constructive critisism r allowed...

Ya...we are only criticizing the characters irrespective of male or females stars. We can't be praising them all the time - the good and bad should be told accordingly. If we are not able to voice out what we feel about these characters then there is no point in having a discussion in the first place. We might as read the updates and watch the episode and keep our mouths shuts with our thoughts and opinions to ourselves. Its normal for ppl to think high of the good and drop the baddies rock bottom. The stars themselves know this...and they just carry on as per script bcoz that's their rice bowl.😃

Here in Thendral all of us simply love TA's character bcoz he is innocent and straightforward unlike his mum and sister - there is completely no evil thoughts in him and he is a perfect hubby for Thulz. But if you were to divert into Thirumathi Selvam - I personally will strangle that Cheri character for being a murderer and a manipulative character. That doesn't mean we have anything against Deepak...he is only doing his job at his best!!

Originally posted by: anituram

Adhum rite dhaan shamz...😆😆😆

Director Sir...did you see these comments about TA? You better do something so that TA is given a boost in his character which will ultimately make our girls eat their own words..!!🤣

Originally posted by: anituram

Thanks Ranu for the short and crisp update😊😊

Thulasi rocked the show...It was like "Netrikannai thirandalum kutram kutramae" ... Even it is my mother she has to pain for her mistakes...More than Bhuvana and thulz...there was so cuteness in sundari and thulasi...

Now i am dreaming like how it will be tamil also will be arriving in that home...if GW comes there...Cant stop my laughing...From now onwards the game starts...


Tamil as usual cute and sundari too was star of the episode...

Ani...nice proverb. Yes... wrong is wrong and no matter who it may be they have to pay a price for it. Wonder who coined this proverb?...they say if the Lord Shiva's netrikan opens anything in front will burn to ashes...😊 and Thulasi is in that stage with so much of anger burning in her towards Bhu for being a heartless and mean character.

Sue Chechi, That was a statement told by a scholar Nakeeran in Thiruvilayadal Puranam. Lord Shiva was angry when Nakeeran told the point told in the poem by Lord Shiva was wrong. (Criticized the poem by Lord Shiva!!!!) The Lord became angry and opened His third eye. That moment Nakeeran told this statement. I always wonder how Nakeeran became so bold in telling this statement because he showed 100% to whom he was talking and he was going to be reduced to ashes.

Originally posted by: maha2us

Sue Chechi, That was a statement told by a scholar Nakeeran in Thiruvilayadal Puranam. Lord Shiva was angry when Nakeeran told the point told in the poem by Lord Shiva was wrong. (Criticized the poem by Lord Shiva!!!!) The Lord became angry and opened His third eye. That moment Nakeeran told this statement. I always wonder how Nakeeran became so bold in telling this statement because he showed 100% to whom he was talking and he was going to be reduced to ashes.