Sneha and Dev were married - Page 4

Originally posted by: TheRowdiest

Don't think too much guys ...😆 ,CVs won't go in so much detail that if Dev and Sneha were married then amu and jaz are illegitimate daughters ...😆

Sneha was married to both so everything is fine 😆 , none is illegitimate, izzat is also safe

actually u said it right minnie...😆
We shuldnt think so deeply about such things...my head started spinning.....the matter settles in both ways actually...😆

Sneha and Dev married secretly. Dev left and Sneha got to know that she was expecting Rachita and kept waiting for Dev but he didn't come back. Hence, Sneha got afraid of what her family and the people of Banaras would think about her as she was expecting because no one knew about her marriage with Dev. So Rishi took Sneha with him to Mumbai to save her honour and Dev may have returned after they left. He thought both of them had betrayed him and in the meanwhile, maybe, Sneha filed for divorce and she sent the papers to Dev and after Dev signed those papers, Sneha and Rishi might have married. This is just my guess.

Originally posted by: ARHIFAIRYTALE

Sneha and Dev married secretly. Dev left and Sneha got to know that she was expecting Rachita and kept waiting for Dev but he didn't come back. Hence, Sneha got afraid of what her family and the people of Banaras would think about her as she was expecting because no one knew about her marriage with Dev. So Rishi took Sneha with him to Mumbai to save her honour and Dev may have returned after they left. He thought both of them had betrayed him and in the meanwhile, maybe, Sneha filed for divorce and she sent the papers to Dev and after Dev signed those papers, Sneha and Rishi might have married. This is just my guess.

But I still don't get how Sneha misunderstood that Dev had left her. Couldn't she talk to Dev on the phone after he was gone. Even if, suppose, Dev had lost his phone, couldn't he contact Sneha in any way. And did Sneha really believe that Dev could ditch her, I mean, didn't she trust him? I hope we'll get our answers in the coming episodes.

P.S. I know that Dev was behind Rishi's bankruptcy but I think Hari was behind Rishi's death.

P.P.S. I don't want the CV's to show Rishi as a bad person who created misunderstandings between Sneha and Dev in order to marry Sneha. This is a big NO for me. I want to remember Rishi as a nice, loyal and loving person.

Originally posted by: TheRowdiest

Don't think too much guys ...😆 ,CVs won't go in so much detail that if Dev and Sneha were married then amu and jaz are illegitimate daughters ...😆

Sneha was married to both so everything is fine 😆 , none is illegitimate, izzat is also safe

QUOTE=tejaswiniwenham]guys if rachi's legitimacy is the issue of concern here then, legitimacy is a strictly legal status, simply defined as being born to legally (licensed and registered) married parents. Rachi was born to Rishi and Sneha Mathur as Rachita Mathur, she's thus by definition Rishi's legitimate daughter. as far as being legitimate in the eyes of God or religion or whatever, its a matter of belief, i don't think Mahadev cares about unimportant things such as legitimacy, we're all his children. and as for society, then no religious hush hush ceremony between dev and sneha nor any signed piece of paper will stop them from questioning rachis 'legitimacy' when the truth comes out. so its better that we don't try to weigh rachi on any scales of legitimacy.
@ red-----Exactly. 👏 In that case Dev is the biological father of Rachita. But her legal father is Rishi.

@blue--- Again agree. If she is 18+ she is a mature girl and free to take her decision. That doesn't make her characterless or anything. I'm fine with that. But shaadi in temple does make it look like they did on hurry. Specially when they informed none of their family. In that case I don't think there was any love between these two people. She was immature that time , so was Dev-------I think still they are immature. Most probably she learned what love really is from Rishi. As sex has nothing to do with love. Animals do that because of hormonal distress all the time. 😕No feelings, no emotions , respect, trust , love is needed there.


@ bold---------I just hope Sneha divorced Dev before marrying Rishi. Most probably a lawyer brought that letter to Dev without any explanation. Although I'm not sure how it happened. As far as I know they need to go to court to have a divorce. Why didn't Dev ask him all these that time?
And if Sneha was with Rishi without divorcing Dev...then it's not legal. Dev can even put her behind the bar. All together CVs are very much screwed up the character and story of Sneha Mathur. Idhar kua to udhar khai.

Now how they will come out of that puzzle that is the question. At present a woman lived with two men ...is making Sneha characterless.

I think this is why she is so scared. OMG!

Okay I have an idea! I read somewhere that there is a place in India , most probably a village...where women can marry more than one. In fact in Tibet too. If Rishi and Sneha were married there or Dev and Sneha married there-----------then all safe.

No one is illegitimate. Sneha's character will be safe too. This is not fair...if a man can marry more than one and keep the both----------why woman can't. hmmm...May be this is what they want to tell.

My head is spinning. Better stop this here. Concentrate more on Manya and Rara. 😆

i think rishi loved her and when dev did not come she felt betrayed and decided to commit suicide rishi saved her and they left banaras thats what i can think of

Originally posted by: jhalak7

QUOTE=tejaswiniwenham]guys if rachi's legitimacy is the issue of concern here then, legitimacy is a strictly legal status, simply defined as being born to legally (licensed and registered) married parents. Rachi was born to Rishi and Sneha Mathur as Rachita Mathur, she's thus by definition Rishi's legitimate daughter. as far as being legitimate in the eyes of God or religion or whatever, its a matter of belief, i don't think Mahadev cares about unimportant things such as legitimacy, we're all his children. and as for society, then no religious hush hush ceremony between dev and sneha nor any signed piece of paper will stop them from questioning rachis 'legitimacy' when the truth comes out. so its better that we don't try to weigh rachi on any scales of legitimacy.

As far as sneha goes, i personally don't find premarital sex or having more than one partner or more than one marriage to be a perimeter to judge anyone by. but yes that shady temple marriage did seem to me to be a lame attempt by a young and foolish dev and sneha to "legalize" their relationship in some form so that they could have sex. it was an extremely silly story and seemed like the cvs didn't want them to have sex premaritally so just made up this shoudy temple marriage as a coverup. but then by religion sneha and rishi have been living in proverbial sin- adultery and amu and jazz products of such. no matter how you spin the story, sneha had two men in her life, and children from both. the cvs shouldve just kept it at premarital sex rather than knitting these layers of religious vs legal legitimacy knots and crosses.

@ red-----Exactly. 👏 In that case Dev is the biological father of Rachita. But her legal father is Rishi.

@blue--- Again agree. If she is 18+ she is a mature girl and free to take her decision. That doesn't make her characterless or anything. I'm fine with that. But shaadi in temple does make it look like they did on hurry. Specially when they informed none of their family. In that case I don't think there was any love between these two people. She was immature that time , so was Dev-------I think still they are immature. Most probably she learned what love really is from Rishi. As sex has nothing to do with love. Animals do that because of hormonal distress all the time. 😕No feelings, no emotions , respect, trust , love is needed there.


@ bold---------I just hope Sneha divorced Dev before marrying Rishi. Most probably a lawyer brought that letter to Dev without any explanation. Although I'm not sure how it happened. As far as I know they need to go to court to have a divorce. Why didn't Dev ask him all these that time?
And if Sneha was with Rishi without divorcing Dev...then it's not legal. Dev can even put her behind the bar. All together CVs are very much screwed up the character and story of Sneha Mathur. Idhar kua to udhar khai.

Now how they will come out of that puzzle that is the question. At present a woman lived with two men ...is making Sneha characterless.

I think this is why she is so scared. OMG!

Originally posted by: jhalak7

Okay I have an idea! I read somewhere that there is a place in India , most probably a village...where women can marry more than one. In fact in Tibet too. If Rishi and Sneha were married there or Dev and Sneha married there-----------then all safe.

No one is illegitimate. Sneha's character will be safe too. This is not fair...if a man can marry more than one and keep the both----------why woman can't. hmmm...May be this is what they want to tell.

My head is spinning. Better stop this here. Concentrate more on Manya and Rara. 😆

Originally posted by: Mages

I don't think rishi's name will get ruin...as the story is abt how his 3 daughters brings back his honour and respect and makes his name proud...

the MU are created by dev's family...rishi doesn't seem to have any hand in it...maybe he loved sneha secretly but the nature of rishi whom is so noble...i don't think he has create the MU...it doesn't suit his personality