Bigg Boss 19: Daily Discussion Thread - 24th Oct 2025
APAHARAANN 24.10
🏏India tour of Australia, 2025: Australia vs India, 3rd ODI, Sydney🏏
PLAN CHANGED 25.10
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai Oct 25, 2025 Episode Discussion Thread
Leap & Separation!
AT - Abhishek Bajaj 🐐 Humara Bajaj ❤️
🏠Caption Writing Contest -Bring Pictures to Life!🏠 RESULTS
Akash & Isha Ambani s birthday celebration in Jamnagar.
I'm disgusted
Sunny Deol accuses few actors of corporate bookings
Abhinav Kashyap about Aamir & Saif
Satish Shah passed away...😞
Spirit - The Sound Story Of The Film
Actor Satish Shah Passes Away
Originally posted by: Abhisheking
forgot to add that m a new recruit in ian's darling's aatma club!! am I right?😃
Originally posted by: creationschhavi
Firstly, let's talk technicalities, this is an official AT, not just a DT. You CANNOT talk against swarya as per IF rules. I do not personally ever go into the Ragya DT but other who do are within their right to as per IF rules, it's not right but as long as the thread isn't an AT, they can do that. Now coming to the story, Chavi your really young so I will chalk it upto your age- love isn't fickle. It doesn't happen with one person and then jump to another. You don't fall in love with people because they are good and caring. The person you love maybe the worst human being alive and you'd still love them. Now for what you feel is Laksh's affection- ofcourse there is affection, love cannot exist without it just as affection cannot exist without love. But if you think laksh has affection for Swara but isn't in love with her, your sorely mistaken. Laksh isn't in love with swara cos she wears western clothes or because she's the first female he's been close to. Laksh loves her because she's her, the good and the bad. He's not a guy whose never been exposed to friemdship with girls before but Swara and him understand each other on a level that others don't. Laksh loves her bossiness and her vulnerability. He loves her the PERSON not a glass doll. He knows her and loves her, idk what in the world makes you doubt it. Love has nothing to do with destiny. Yes, whether you come together or not, that depends on destiny. But love doesn't happen because your destined to be with someone. It can happen in the most and least favorable of circumstances, that's destiny but what destiny, even God, the father of destiny and He whose given us free will has no say over who we love. That's what's unique about this human emotion, love can change the destiny of the greatest of emperors but destiny can only dictate the result of love, not whom you love. Now as far as it being Laksh's one sided love, I think it's rather clear that that's not the case, no matter how much Swara denies it, there's something there. Now you can choose to not believe it because of her denial, you'd call her a bad sister if she admitted, but it's there. And even if it isn't, just because someone doesn't get love in return for love doesn't make their love any more weightless. Love isn't a deal, it's defo not a give and take, it just is. So saying Laksh's love is one sided is firstly at this point slightly incorrect and secondly ineffectual. Yes if love doesn't happen in the right time, it may not take its warranted road but time doesn't determine love. You forgot a very significant thing about yesterday's epi- Laksh didnt tail behind Swara, he silently have her the space and time she needs. He surrendered everything he loved to his father but he didn't surrender his love for Swara- I will do everything you say but nobody will take swaras space in my heart. This wasn't a aashique 3 rebel man declaring love, this was a lover declaring faith and his conviction in his love. As for ragya becoming friends and coming together, Ofcourse they will be friends but she'll never be his bestfriends, that friend and love is swara. Laksh isn't a fickle man, that's the sign of a coward and weak person. Laksh isn't either. he holds the guts to tell anyone and everyone that he loves swara, no matter how unacceptable they think that is, you need an insurmountable amount of confidence for that, if he wasn't sure of Swara, he'd find it IMPOSSIBLE to declare like that. Now coming to Ragini, this is the only time she's supported him, it's always been swara before. And that too to win per swara. And a good life partner isn't one who just supports you and consoles you and just lets you get away with your shit, it's someone who inspires you, pushes you to be a better person for your love and for yourself, that's swara for laksh. Idk y I'm telling you this. Your immaturity is quite evident in your choice of reference, for you a joke is more significant than a solid friendship and understanding. im not even trying to defend swarya against your fantastical claims. I'm simply telling you what we've been shown and how far away your expectations are from reality. There are more good people than bad in this world, but that doesn't mean that just because Ragini is good, that laksh should love her. Love has spoken, laksh's has favored Swara not Ragini- as of now, for a long time to come laksh will love swara and that's a limitation of the ragya story you'll need to come to terms with. He'll only marry her under compulsion, nothing less. I'm saying this not to hurt you but I hope you'll understand that love is not like the river currents that change direction but the giant rock on the river path that stays steady through all changes in current. You'll understand in time, love you feel for a lover is completely different from anything you'll ever feel for anyone else. It's not comparable. Destiny hands you every other love- parents siblings children even friendship happens mostly under favorable circumstances but love is the one emotion that doesn't care for destiny, it happens and it thrives whether destiny permits or not because it never cares about the end result. That's exactly how laksh describes his love for swara. I'm not gonna change anything here. I've been trying to write to you for hours but my kids are as usual running wild. But I hope you'll appreciate what I'm saying. You are technically breaking rules but what really I don't understand is your adamancy to ignore facts and the lack of understanding of adult/semi adult love in your writing other than the glaring loopholes that is. Anyways I hope you read it and I hope you can rethink your arguments with more rationality and not just by refuting characters' feelings.








