Originally posted by: tejaswiniwenham
First of all, I think everyone can vouch that Im quite vocally pro-Ragini, but Ya I don't like ragya for two reasons- any story with them will be, according to me, a terrible cliche that I'm uninterested in watching, and two, it'll pretty much kill any growth in Ragini's character cos it'd prove her to have no self respect. As I've always said, hit me once shame on you, hit me twice shame on me. I really don't understand what point your trying to make? That laksh should marry Ragini just because swara MAY not love him? Or that Shekhar discriminates between his kids? And can you please let me in on that spoiler of Ragini sensing laksh's unhappiness cos I haven't read that anywhere, and based on things that haven't happened, you've made quite the sweeping statement that Ragini can always tell when Laksh is unhappy whilst we haven't been shown anything to indicate as such. And really that sit-up scene was suppose to be comic relief, not laksh being in actual physical pain, and the only reason she asked him about how things went when he went to see his mother was not because Ragini knew he was upset but because she thought he went there to talk about their rishta. Literally had nothing to do with Laksh's pain or feelings. If she was so intuned to his feelings, you'd think that she'd have stood up for laksh when he was at dadi's feet, the only person who made a move to help him was Swara but she was stopped by Shomi. Honestly, you read too much into things that aren't that significant but I can understand, your a ragya fan so you rationalize their angle using whatever material you can. As far as sanskaar goes, I don't know but it's really silly to show him wanting to separate swarya- any reasoning he has will only be illogical and skewed. It's better if the cvs drop any plans of that angle.
