Originally posted by: AnuMP
You see. Emotional entanglements are an individual business. No one but the spouse(s) get to question each other on it. Certainly not fans 5K years from their lives 😆
If they actually showed signs of atea tion, the discussion would make sense, regardless of the offense taken by supporters of the spouse. Say, Indra-Ahalya. Or Tara-Shani. Heck, even Dury-Subhi makes more sense than KaLi as they were supposedly engaged before Arjan kidnapped her😆
My question is this.
1) KaLi hardly met
2) If we go by the popular versi OK n, she REJECTED him categorically
3) If we go by CE, he didn't even participate.
4) In the DS, he instigated the ASSAULT on her
5) She held him in contempt as is evidenced by her calling him along with pthers, 'a little man'
6) She repeatedly urged her best buddy to kill him
How on earth do some people read ATTRACTION into this scenario?😲😆
You have to read in between the lines and make up whatever stuff you can Anu, duh.
1) Draupadi is a lady, Karna is a man - opposites attract. Who cares if they didn't meet, they saw each other when they looked at the sun / fire.
2) She rejected to MARRY him because love between lovers is far greater than love between married couples. She married Arjun because she WASN'T attracted to him.
3) Or did he? No he didn't. Or did he? No seriously he didn't.
4) But maybe she wanted to show her ... no. I refuse to complete that statement. That's just stupid, insulting, and offending.
5) That was just a disguise so no one gets wind of their deep deep love.
6) How else was she supposed to bring up the convo of the enemy that she loves
Disclaimer: Yes I'm being sarcastic. No I am not supporting KaLi. Yes I am a Drau fan. No, you cannot use my statements as fact.