my take on today's epi

I can agree with you that it had been established that Yuvraj saw even harmful acts by psychobaby as childish and as uncalculated responses in the spirit of a child hitting back, rather than as vicious as they actually were. His image of her is of an innocent child, and it perhaps was hard to believe that she could or would willfully cause such damage to anyone.

Suhani went into shock too, when she saw the video, but she didn't barge into BH and scream at psycho, even when she had the proof of what she had done. She tried to find a way to bring out the truth without causing anyone harm. IMO that's being a little too nice, but whatever. I also feel that rather than going to Pratima, who'd been treating her coldly and acting like she didn't know her, she should have gone to Yuvraj, who had stood by her. But these are all cv logistics to enhance drama.

Of course I want a separation,to bring focus back on Yuvraj and Suhani, and I'm glad the stage has been set. And no, I never wanted Yuvraj perfect, and since the day this track started, I've been expecting an outburst at some point. I can understand he truly believed that psych was incapable of guile. BUT, compare the way he reacts to dadi's vituperation (I can best describe it as respectful disagreement, when he does disagree, and this towards a woman who locked away his effing beloved sister for a major part of her miserable life) and how he spoke to Suhani and what he said. He accused her of deliberately forcing psych to admit to guilt, manipulating her love for Adi, as being so crazy in her need to prove her father innocent that she crossed all limits, blaming the poor victim.

KNOWING how dadi and RagsMen are towards Suhani, KNOWING Suhani, he went off and said all this in front of them? He couldn't have pulled her aside? (Yes, I know, it would interrupt the dramatic scene.) Even when dadi told Suhani to get out, he turned away looking disgusted (at Suhani), like she deserved it. At the final juncture, he failed. I do see it as a relapse, I know he will be sorry, but it's sad that at THIS point he failed to trust Su enough.

And what bugged me most wasthose few minutes of satisfaction and triumph he would've given dadi and RagsMen by having a go at Suhani.

I loled at dadi saying ''what truth, which truth, how can we believe Gauri.'' Now they can't believe psycho, but when it came to taking her word alone against someone like Pankaj, she was totally dependable? And ''if Gauri has done this, prove it''. Why, what proof did psych offer apart from screaming molestation and a torn sleeve? When everything pointed to Pankaj's innocence (phone records, the broken vase, psych's wound, her anger at Suhani, her story being largely unsubstantiated), they were determined to find him guilty, and when it comes to her own, she wants proof. And that chamchi Rags, who hated psycho and called her mad suddenly was all for her because she was such a weapon against Suhani? What sh**s these people are (I mean dadi, Rags (esp) and Men, psycho, and Loots)

Originally posted by: AfrigalYuvani

Anita_m today We are so on the same page...I think I said pretty much what you just said in another post regarding Yuvis reaction...but am calm now not ranting anymore.

I get the fact that evil characters must exist but do the good charcters have to be such bloody doormats for everyone to just wipe their nasty feet on them...so the person that ruined your Dads life...almost drove him to suicide...that person is the one you are worried about...Su did not go to Yuvi but went to Prats" because she was worried of the effect of the truth and the fact that it would ruin Gauris Life" comeon even Jesus got mad when people turned God's temple into a market and he screamed and overturned a few tables ...even God had to smite some people for turning away from the righteous path but not our Su...she is all pure annoying not human goodness...

Originally posted by: anita_m

I can agree with you that it had been established that Yuvraj saw even harmful acts by psychobaby as childish and as uncalculated responses in the spirit of a child hitting back, rather than as vicious as they actually were. His image of her is of an innocent child, and it perhaps was hard to believe that she could or would willfully cause such damage to anyone.

Suhani went into shock too, when she saw the video, but she didn't barge into BH and scream at psycho, even when she had the proof of what she had done. She tried to find a way to bring out the truth without causing anyone harm. IMO that's being a little too nice, but whatever. I also feel that rather than going to Pratima, who'd been treating her coldly and acting like she didn't know her, she should have gone to Yuvraj, who had stood by her. But these are all cv logistics to enhance drama.

Of course I want a separation,to bring focus back on Yuvraj and Suhani, and I'm glad the stage has been set. And no, I never wanted Yuvraj perfect, and since the day this track started, I've been expecting an outburst at some point. I can understand he truly believed that psych was incapable of guile. BUT, compare the way he reacts to dadi's vituperation (I can best describe it as respectful disagreement, when he does disagree, and this towards a woman who locked away his effing beloved sister for a major part of her miserable life) and how he spoke to Suhani and what he said. He accused her of deliberately forcing psych to admit to guilt, manipulating her love for Adi, as being so crazy in her need to prove her father innocent that she crossed all limits, blaming the poor victim.

KNOWING how dadi and RagsMen are towards Suhani, KNOWING Suhani, he went off and said all this in front of them? He couldn't have pulled her aside? (Yes, I know, it would interrupt the dramatic scene.) Even when dadi told Suhani to get out, he turned away looking disgusted (at Suhani), like she deserved it. At the final juncture, he failed. I do see it as a relapse, I know he will be sorry, but it's sad that at THIS point he failed to trust Su enough.

And what bugged me most wasthose few minutes of satisfaction and triumph he would've given dadi and RagsMen by having a go at Suhani.

I loled at dadi saying ''what truth, which truth, how can we believe Gauri.'' Now they can't believe psycho, but when it came to taking her word alone against someone like Pankaj, she was totally dependable? And ''if Gauri has done this, prove it''. Why, what proof did psych offer apart from screaming molestation and a torn sleeve? When everything pointed to Pankaj's innocence (phone records, the broken vase, psych's wound, her anger at Suhani, her story being largely unsubstantiated), they were determined to find him guilty, and when it comes to her own, she wants proof. And that chamchi Rags, who hated psycho and called her mad suddenly was all for her because she was such a weapon against Suhani? What sh**s these people are (I mean dadi, Rags (esp) and Men, psycho, and Loots)