How are views and fan points calculated for celebs?-pg 4/29 Modnote 40 - Page 7

Originally posted by: riti4u

deepthi di...i wont say there is manipulation 😆..but then we have only pics views as our data... then how can we check where we are lacking...there shud be some transparency here... and why this sudden gap between 1st ,2nd and even 3 rd for that matter in viewpoints...thus my only concern is- Yes people can make assumption of manipulation...so in order to make system here transparent...please bring into account profile views being listed or views being listed on each tab then... so that we know this is where difference is..and we are not left to our assumption...

I really wish someone answer soon...coz i feel like I am wasting my time here😆

Originally posted by: riti4u

got this from comment section courtesy serendipity235kindly provide an answer if you people are fair."Observation: I checked the total views of the first 25 pics (first page of photo gallery) of the current ranks 1 and 2, about 3 hrs ago. These were the figures:
Rank 1: 19,994
Rank 2: 26,104.
These pics were put up in both profiles around the same time, so the timeframe for comparison is the same.
The views in the next 3-4 pages followed the same pattern more or less..I cant imagine that the other pics will have drastically different trends. So where is the anomaly coming from? At worst, rank 1 and 2 should have approx. equal views..certainly not 50% less as shown in the ranking figures.
I bring this up because a lot of people put in a lot of effort..its not just effort, but emotions are involved too. Can we not get an explanation for the wide discrepancy in the actual and depicted figures??
"

Originally posted by: saalu1

Mr. Vijay, are you going to answer these, we are waiting for your response.
If admins are not interested in answering this, then please close this topic. What is the use of suggestions/comments forum if the queries are ignored